https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2296801
--- Comment #8 from Frank Dedden <frank(a)systemf.dev> ---
Nice. What do we do for this release?
1. Wait for the release on hackage, and (as an exception) base the package on
the hackage version instead of the stackage release?
2. Manually adjust the license file or field. This way we would deviate from
upstream.
3. Just package it as is: it won't be correct, but atleast we stay true to
upstream. This will be fixed when the next version hits stackage.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2296801
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308803
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |fedora-review+
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com
Status|NEW |POST
URL|https://hackage.haskell.org |https://hackage.haskell.org
|/package/%{pkg_name} |/package/copilot-prettyprin
| |ter
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
LGTM thanks
- pristine spec file generated by cabal-rpm
- License is BSD3 and package builds and installs
- complies with Haskell Packaging Policy
Package is APPROVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308803
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…