https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
Bug ID: 1427000 Summary: c2hs does not like gcc7 __float128 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: gtk2hs-buildtools Assignee: petersen@redhat.com Reporter: petersen@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen@redhat.com
Description of problem: gtk2hs packages are failing to build on i686 in F26 Rawhide with gcc7 due to the addition of a __float128 alignment directive in stddef.h.
Configuring glib-0.13.2.2... + '[' -x Setup ']' + LANG=en_US.utf8 + ./Setup build Building glib-0.13.2.2... Preprocessing library glib-0.13.2.2... gtk2hsC2hs: Error in C header file. /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/7/include/stddef.h:435: (column 3) [FATAL]
Syntax error!
The symbol `__float128' does not fit here.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gtk2hs-buildtools-0.13.2.2 gcc-7.0.1-0.10.fc26
How reproducible: 100%
Steps to Reproduce: 1. try to build ghc-glib, ghc-gio, ghc-pango, ghc-gtk3, etc
Actual results: see above
Expected results: no failure
Additional info: Upstream report https://github.com/gtk2hs/gtk2hs/issues/200
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1423041 (F26FTBFS) CC| |releng@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- *** Bug 1423606 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423041 [Bug 1423041] Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild FTBFS Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |gtk2hs-gcc7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- *** Bug 1423609 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hardware|Unspecified |i686
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|c2hs does not like gcc7 |c2hs does not like gcc7 |__float128 |i686 __float128
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- *** Bug 1423603 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- *** Bug 1423602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- *** Bug 1423608 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- *** Bug 1423605 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- *** Bug 1423604 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fweimer@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
--- Comment #8 from Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com --- c2hs should probably ship its own version of <stddef.h> because that header necessarily uses GNU extensions.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST
--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- I found an upstream patch a while ago https://github.com/gtk2hs/gtk2hs/issues/200
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
--- Comment #11 from Fedora End Of Life jkurik@fedoraproject.org --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 26 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 26. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '26'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 26 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427000
Fedora End Of Life jkurik@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed| |2018-05-29 08:00:01
--- Comment #12 from Fedora End Of Life jkurik@fedoraproject.org --- Fedora 26 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2018-05-29. Fedora 26 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org