Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com&gt; 2011-04-03 01:59:42 EDT --- http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-cautious-file.spec http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-cautious-file-0.1.5-2... rpmlint -i ghc-cautious-file.spec ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-cautious-file-0.1.5-2.fc14.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-cautious-file-*.rpm ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-cautious-file-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-cautious-file-prof.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit, pos ix, pos-ix The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-cautious-file-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/cautious-file-0.1.5/libHScautious-file-0.1.5_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |notready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; 2011-11-10 04:27:07 EST --- http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/cautious-file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 --- Comment #6 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-02-11 05:40:11 EST --- SPEC file: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-cautious-file.spec SRPM http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-cautious-file-1.0-1.f... rpmlint output: rpmlint -i *.rpm ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-cautious-file-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|Ready | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; 2012-02-25 02:32:02 EST --- Sorry for long wait - been busy with ARM and other "distractions"... Here is the review: +:ok, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [] MUST: rpmlint output [1] ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ghc-cautious-file.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ghc-cautious-file-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. waived [+] MUST: package named according to Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [2] [+] MUST: meet Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: Fedora approved license and Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [3] [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [4] [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English [5] and legible. [6] [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release (from upstream URL) ca18207cccb0ab7c7c2649133943ccc4 cautious-file-1.0.tar.gz [!] MUST: successfully compile and build into binary rpms on a primary arch [7] Srpm doesn't build in mock/koji though: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3817824 due to missing BR on bytestring. [NA] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [8] [-] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires See preceding comment. [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [9] [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [11] [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [12] [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [13] [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [14] [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [15] [+] MUST: consistently use macros [16] [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] [NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [18] [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [18] [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [21] [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [20] [NA] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [22] [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [23] [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [24] SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [27] [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [29] Please fix the above missing BR when importing. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-03-01 03:56:14 EST --- Thanks for the review. I will incorporate the patch. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-cautious-file Short Description: Provides ways to write a file cautiously Owners: narasim Branches: f17 f16 f15 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2012-03-03 13:34:57 EST --- ghc-cautious-file-1.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-cautious-file-1.0-2.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2012-03-05 15:59:28 EST --- ghc-cautious-file-1.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ghc-cautious-file-1.0-2.fc1 |ghc-cautious-file-1.0-2.fc1 |7 |6 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2012-03-17 19:49:44 EDT --- ghc-cautious-file-1.0-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ghc-cautious-file New Branches: epel7 Owners: petersen InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vrCxHk2ZMZ&a=cc_unsubscribe

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WGydrgPpyO&a=cc_unsubscribe

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ghc-cautious-file-1.0-2.fc1 |ghc-cautious-file-1.0.2-2.e |5 |l7 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; --- ghc-cautious-file-1.0.2-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wGx70q99Yp&a=cc_unsubscribe