Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ghc-tagged -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; 2011-10-27 00:05:29 EDT --- Thanks for the submission - looks fine to me. Here is the review: +:ok, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint output [1] ghc-tagged.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Newtype -> New type, New-type, Tintype ghc-tagged.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Newtype -> New type, New-type, Tintype 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ghc-tagged.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Newtype -> New type, New-type, Tintype ghc-tagged.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Newtype -> New type, New-type, Tintype 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ghc-tagged-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Newtype -> New type, New-type, Tintype 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [+] MUST: package named according to Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [2] [+] MUST: meet Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: Fedora approved license and Licensing Guidelines BSD 3 clause [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [3] [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [4] [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English [5] and legible. [6] [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release (from upstream URL) 7899d417f18952a5a56b8588ba4724e4 tagged-0.2.3.1.tar.gz [+] MUST: successfully compile and build into binary rpms on a primary arch [7] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3465018 [NA] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [8] [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [9] [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [11] [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [12] [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [13] [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [14] [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [15] [+] MUST: consistently use macros [16] [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] [NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [18] [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [18] [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [21] [NA] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [20] [NA] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [22] [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [23] [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [24] SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: If upstream source does not include license text file(s), the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [25] [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [27] [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [29] [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [21] The source files also include headers tagged with the license. :) Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|unspecified |medium Flag| |fedora-cvs+ Severity|unspecified |medium --- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com&gt; 2011-10-27 13:23:04 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-tagged Short Description: Newtype wrappers for phantom types Owners: narasim Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 --- Comment #6 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com&gt; 2011-10-28 11:28:13 EDT --- Built for rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=271224 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2011-11-03 23:44:44 EDT --- ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2011-11-05 19:57:29 EDT --- ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2011-11-22 19:52:41 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2011-11-22 19:52:41 EST --- ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc15 |ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc16 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2011-11-22 20:00:48 EST --- ghc-tagged-0.2.3.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746557 Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IAhVvd8TCf&a=cc_unsubscribe