https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2296801
--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- (In reply to Frank Dedden from comment #8)
Nice. What do we do for this release?
- Wait for the release on hackage, and (as an exception) base the package
on the hackage version instead of the stackage release? 2. Manually adjust the license file or field. This way we would deviate from upstream. 3. Just package it as is: it won't be correct, but atleast we stay true to upstream. This will be fixed when the next version hits stackage.
Well I am assuming it would just be a minor version bump.
Maybe let's see how long 1 takes. Otherwise maybe a patch from github could be applied I think.
From the Fedora perspective I would prefer 1 or patching, that would be better I think.
It is okay to use "cabal-rpm spec --stream hackage" in this case, though actually it seems monadLib is not in Stackage currently, so I think cabal-rpm will pick it from Hackage anyway.
haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org