October 2009 - i18n-bugs - Fedora mailing-lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 518932] New: Unable to use an input method when using stardict
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Oct '09

23 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Unable to use an input method when using stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518932 Summary: Unable to use an input method when using stardict Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: stardict AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: frigoris.ma(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, zhu(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When the StarDict window is active, it's utterly impossible to switch to an input method and type some Chinese words as search keys, no matter by a keyboard combo or the GUI icon in the panel. Back on F10 this has been a problem, but I thought it could be a bug in SCIM, which was the IME I used. Now on F11 we switched to IBus and it's still broken. It seems that IBus works everywhere but in StarDict so I guess it's in StarDict that the culprit is. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): stardict-3.0.1-17.fc11.i586 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Use an IME (e.g. IBus) 2. Launch StarDict 3. Try typing some CJK characters in the StarDict query box ;) Actual results: Input methods can't be activated. Expected results: It should have been ;) Additional info: I tested with Pinyin only. I guess it would be the same with others. Thanks for looking into this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526881] New: [abrt] crash detected in ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc12
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Oct '09

23 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [abrt] crash detected in ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526881 Summary: [abrt] crash detected in ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc12 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:fc1f2891 Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus-anthy AssignedTo: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: azelinka(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- abrt detected a crash. How to reproduce ----- 1. 2. 3. Comment ----- As recomended in bz526222, I've replaced scim with ibus (only ibus+devs and ibus-anthy pkgs installed). Then I've aded "Japanese anthy" via ibus-setup and made ibus the default input method using im-chooser. Both im-chooser and ibus-setup generates this error, probably because it starts ibus-server. Additional information ====== Attached files ---- backtrace cmdline ----- python /usr/share/ibus-anthy/engine/main.py --ibus component ----- ibus-anthy executable ----- /usr/share/ibus-anthy/engine/main.py kernel ----- 2.6.31.1-56.fc12.x86_64 package ----- ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc12 uuid ----- fc1f2891 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 530509] New: Default keyboard layout doesn't follow the system keyboard configuration
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Oct '09

23 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Default keyboard layout doesn't follow the system keyboard configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530509 Summary: Default keyboard layout doesn't follow the system keyboard configuration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gdm AssignedTo: jmccann(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jmccann(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: I've tried Fedora 12 Beta and installed with Japanese. once the installation finished, booting up. gdm shows me the default keyboard is USA. even though /etc/sysconfig/keyboard has: KEYTABLE="jp106" MODEL="jp106" LAYOUT="jp" KEYBOARDTYPE="pc" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gdm-2.28.0-9.fc12.i686 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.fresh install on 12-Beta or create a new user 2.select the account on gdm 3.see the keyboard layout at the bottom of the screen. Actual results: USA Expected results: Japan Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Oct '09

23 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #27 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-10-23 04:40:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > yeah, fc-scan is giving wrong o/p for console8*8 font family name, looks some > problem. we dont a source file for console8*8 Well, your choices for that file are : 1. drop it, wait for complains, ask whoever complains to fix the file 2. write a fontforge (or other) script to fix the file yourself at build time 3. enhance fontconfig to read the real font name (assuming it is present at all in the font file) 4. remap the font name in a fontconfig rule (see the remapping-font-template). But this is still a workaround, not a complete solution, and you'll get nagged every time the font audit scripts run Continuing to deploy a file that does not work in fontconfig is not acceptable, that sends the wrong message to third-parties. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 528677] New: Add again iok support in ibus-m17n
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Oct '09

23 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Add again iok support in ibus-m17n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528677 Summary: Add again iok support in ibus-m17n Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: urgent Component: ibus-m17n AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, aalam(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Last build of ibus-m17n removed iok support. Please apply patch in Fedora package cvs of iok support to ibus-m17n source code. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-m17n-1.2.0.20090617-2.fc12 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.select any indic inscript input engine. 2. check for iok icon on ibus panel. 3. Actual results: There is no iok icon on ibus panel. Expected results: There should be iok icon to support iok application. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 16

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 228804] [CJK] different fonts used for Latin and Common chars
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Oct '09

23 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228804 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide Summary|[All lang] [firefox] - Face |[CJK] different fonts used |of the number is changing |for Latin and Common chars |when enter number + Char, | |in any Locale | --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-23 01:23:22 EDT --- firefox-3.5 in current f12 rawhide looks ok to me. But the general pango issue is still unchanged I think. (In reply to comment #3) > What's the rationale for such a change? Common characters are common to all > scripts. They are not Latin. If I write in Persian, I want common characters > chosen from my Persian font, not Latin font. It is different for CJK - they have their own wide punctuation and number glyphs. For CJK COMMON and LATIN glyphs should be rendered in the same font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Oct '09

23 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #26 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-23 01:09:01 EDT --- updates spec and srpm http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts.spec http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts-0.3-13.fc11.src.rpm yeah, fc-scan is giving wrong o/p for console8*8 font family name, looks some problem. we dont a source file for console8*8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 530273] ibus-table-additional depends on OLD ibus-table
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '09

22 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530273 Caius 'kaio' Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 530273] ibus-table-additional depends on OLD ibus-table
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '09

22 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530273 --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance <cchance(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-22 19:33:14 EDT --- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-table-1.2.0.20091014-2.fc11?_c… It has been built in buildsys and I have submitted for pushing to updates-testing repository. Once this one is pushed to updates-testing repo, I will wait for 3 days before I submit to push that into updates stable repo. Alternatively, if 3 testers confirmed that this works, it could be automatically be pushed from updates-testing to updates stable repo. Thank you very much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 511482] New: FTBFS UnihanDb-5.1.0-7.fc11.1
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '09

22 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS UnihanDb-5.1.0-7.fc11.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511482 Summary: FTBFS UnihanDb-5.1.0-7.fc11.1 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mo ck-results/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: UnihanDb AssignedTo: dchen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: ftbfs(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dchen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Blocks: 511348 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora UnihanDb-5.1.0-7.fc11.1.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 530273] ibus-table-additional depends on OLD ibus-table
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '09

22 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530273 Rich Megginson <rmeggins(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|nhosoi(a)redhat.com, |cchance(a)redhat.com, |nkinder(a)redhat.com, |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com |rmeggins(a)redhat.com |, phuang(a)redhat.com Component|389-admin-console |ibus-table AssignedTo|rmeggins(a)redhat.com |cchance(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '09

22 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-10-22 05:27:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #23) > > 3. Some of the files in bitmap-console-fonts declare their name as > > "console8x8.pcf" which is almost certainly a bug > you are talking about fontname, or file name I'm talking about fontname as used by fontconfig (fc-query with the pkgkit format as used to generate rpm font metadata) > > 4. The Lucida Typewriter fonts in bitmap-fonts should be pushed in a > > bitmap-lucida-typewriter-fonts subpackage > in that case, bitmap-fonts rpm will be empty? It is perfectly possible to have a srpm that only generates subpackages with different names. rpm will only generate a bitmap-fonts rpm from the bitmap-fonts srpm if you put some files in it > > 6. you can probably kill the common file and put each license %doc in the > > corresponding subpackage (just put the %doc line after the corresponding > > %_font_pkg call). You just need to have each subpackage require > > fontpackages-filesystem direcly > > so here we suppose to remove common package, also README will not require > and put files for each subpackage in %doc, but we dont have any for console > what to do for it? If you don't have any doc for console, I guess it will be a doc-less subpackage :) The main use of -common if when you have bulky shared documentation (very often, big pdf files in the font world) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '09

22 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #24 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-22 05:07:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > > 2. You have some stray "fixed" font in bitmap-console-fonts yep console9x15.pcf has written fontname FixedMedium in that case i think we will require Fixed subpackage, with this file included > 3. Some of the files in bitmap-console-fonts declare their name as > "console8x8.pcf" which is almost certainly a bug you are talking about fontname, or file name i did not found this in fontname, please provide bit more info. > > 4. The Lucida Typewriter fonts in bitmap-fonts should be pushed in a > bitmap-lucida-typewriter-fonts subpackage in that case, bitmap-fonts rpm will be empty? > > 6. you can probably kill the common file and put each license %doc in the > corresponding subpackage (just put the %doc line after the corresponding > %_font_pkg call). You just need to have each subpackage require > fontpackages-filesystem direcly so here we suppose to remove common package, also README will not require and put files for each subpackage in %doc, but we dont have any for console what to do for it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 527214] New: Use upstream tarball and make modifications during the build
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '09

22 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Use upstream tarball and make modifications during the build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527214 Summary: Use upstream tarball and make modifications during the build Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: sazanami-fonts AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: caolanm(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=363657) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363657) alternative approach that self-documents our changes As described in rhbz#461617 we have a modified sazanami-fonts tarball that differs from the original. Apparently to change the 0x7E6B glyph in the Gothic and Mincho fonts according to rhbz##196433 Attached is a suggestion to use the original tarball and modify it during the build to swap in the two desired replacement glyphs using the ttx tool from fontutils. I don't have strong feelings about this one way or the other, but I feel this might be a rather "neater" and self-documenting mechanism to solving the original problem ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 530285] New: Specific Information about default font need to be displayed on global font settings' GUI
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '09

22 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Specific Information about default font need to be displayed on global font settings' GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530285 Summary: Specific Information about default font need to be displayed on global font settings' GUI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=365660) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365660) Screenshot for the font GUI showing "Sans" Description of problem: (this cannot be termed as a "bug") The default font for Malayalam in Fedora is smc-meera-fonts. When logging into Malayalam locale, the font details appearing on the GUI (System->Preferences->Appearance->Font) is as shown in screenshot. It says "Sans" instead of "Meera". This does not give any information to the normal user about which font he is currently viewing on his desktop. I understand there are ways to get the font information from command line interface. But how to get this information on GUI? Please advise how this can be done and thus the purpose of GUI can be better served in a more useful way to the user. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login to Malayalam (ml_IN) locale 2. Select System->Preferences->Appearance->Font) 3. Check the font information displayed on GUI Actual results: font appear as "Sans" Expected results: >From user point of view I feel this must be shown as "Meera", as "Sans" does not give any information about the default font used in Malayalam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 529975] New: ghostscript files referred to outdated font info
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Oct '09

21 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghostscript files referred to outdated font info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529975 Summary: ghostscript files referred to outdated font info Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cjkuni-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: htl10(a)users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 488398 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #488398 +++ Description of problem: The /usr/share/ghostscript/config.d/*map* files just need to match exactly the locations and naming of the fonts. Issue refered in the old bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398#c7) is recurring again, with a different variation: config refers to "/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni/uming.ttc", but the location on rawhide and f11 are both "/usr/share/fonts/cjkuni-uming/uming.ttc" (note the extra bits "-uming"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476871] GDM uses wrong keyboard layout after switching back
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Oct '09

21 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476871 --- Comment #14 from fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-21 05:31:11 EDT --- Now two upstreamed bugs are filed: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572765 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585290 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526356] New: Please rebuild against new ibus libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please rebuild against new ibus libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526356 Summary: Please rebuild against new ibus libraries Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: low Component: ibus-anthy AssignedTo: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: webmaster(a)aus-city.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package ibus.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package ibus-anthy.i586 0:1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: kasumi for package: ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 ---> Package ibus-gtk.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.i586 ---> Package ibus-libs.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package ibus-pinyin.noarch 0:1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: python-enchant for package: ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.i586 ---> Package kasumi.i586 0:2.4-2.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package python-enchant.i586 0:1.3.1-4.fc11 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.i586 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0 is needed by package ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.i586 (installed) ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0 is needed by package ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 (installed) ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.i586 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0 is needed by package ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.i586 (installed) ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.i586 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0 is needed by package ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.i586 (installed) --> Running transaction check ---> Package ibus-libs.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: ibus-libs = 1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 for package: ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.1 for package: ibus-gtk-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.1 for package: ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 --> Finished Dependency Resolution ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: ibus-libs = 1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 is needed by package ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 (updates) ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.1 is needed by package ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 (updates) ibus-gtk-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.1 is needed by package ibus-gtk-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 (updates) --> Running transaction check ---> Package ibus.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: ibus >= 1.2.0 for package: ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch --> Processing Dependency: ibus >= 1.2.0.20090904 for package: ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 ---> Package ibus-gtk.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package ibus-libs.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch from updates has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: ibus >= 1.2.0 is needed by package ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch (updates) ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 from updates has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: ibus >= 1.2.0.20090904 is needed by package ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 (updates) Packages skipped because of dependency problems: ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 from updates ibus-gtk-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates ibus-libs-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch from updates kasumi-2.4-2.fc11.i586 from fedora python-enchant-1.3.1-4.fc11.i586 from fedora Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-10-20 20:57:25 EDT --- gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gargi-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10712 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-10-20 20:50:38 EDT --- gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gargi-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10660 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 518901] New: ibus-chewing would not work with locale zh_TW.Big5
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-chewing would not work with locale zh_TW.Big5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518901 Summary: ibus-chewing would not work with locale zh_TW.Big5 Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: ibus-chewing AssignedTo: dchen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: shr_msn(a)yahoo.com.tw QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, dchen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: ibus-chewing would not work with locale zh_TW.Big5 after applied recent updates, the original Fedora 11 will work fine Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-1.1.0.20090612-3.fc11.x86_64 ibus-libs-1.1.0.20090612-3.fc11.x86_64 ibus-gtk-1.1.0.20090612-3.fc11.x86_64 ibus-chewing-1.0.10.20090523-2.fc11.x86_64 How reproducible: use locale "zh_TW.Big5" Steps to Reproduce: 1. edit /etc/sysconfig/i18n, set LANG="zh_TW.Big5" 2. restart Xwindow 3. ibus-chewing will not work Actual results: not work (when switch to chewing, the input window popup then disappear) Expected results: work Additional info: If somebody needs zh_TW.Big5 environment and ibus-chewing, workaround: open terminal (In Xwindow) locale (this is not need, just confirm current locale, zh_TW.Big5 will not work...) ps auxww | grep \[i\]bus (find ibus process, could not see /usr/libexec/ibus-engine-chewing --ibus with zh_TW.Big5) kill pid_of_ibus ( kill "/usr/libexec/ibus-x11 --kill-daemon" will kill all ) export LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8 /usr/bin/ibus-daemon --xim & then it will work fine, you can close this terminal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 529818] Unable to query PCF/BDF fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529818 --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-20 05:13:26 EDT --- I've attached the proposed patch to upstream bugzilla fwiw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 529818] Unable to query PCF/BDF fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529818 Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 524892] New: cpi setting not used accurately
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cpi setting not used accurately https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524892 Summary: cpi setting not used accurately Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Version: 6.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: paps AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: twaugh(a)redhat.com QAContact: eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Depends on: 524883 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 524883 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #524883 +++ Created an attachment (id=362101) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362101) ppd.ppd Description of problem: When used as texttopaps, the 'cpi' option is only used to scale the font to the nearest integer point size. This isn't nearly good enough: it must be *exact*. The reason is that it is used for controlling the number of columns of text print, and this needs to be set to e.g. 132, or 80, or whatever is required. Unfortunately the only way to set it is indirectly, via 'cpi'. Of course this depends on the page size used, as well as the printer margins. Here is a test case for verifying that it is operating correctly. The CUPS filter 'texttops' passes this test, and 'texttopaps' must as well. The test case consists of a PPD 'ppd.ppd', an input file '132.txt', and a command line given below. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): paps-0.6.8-10.fc12.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: PPD=ppd.ppd \ /usr/lib/cups/filter/texttopaps 1 tim '' 1 \ 'cpi=17.6 lpi=6.7 page-bottom=36 page-left=36 \ page-right=36 page-top=36 scaling=100' 132.txt > out.ps Actual results: See actual.jpg. Expected results: When viewing the resulting PostScript (with, say, evince), the result should look as in expected.jpg: in particular, there should be exactly 132 characters per line, and the output should fit on a single side of US Letter paper. --- Additional comment from twaugh(a)redhat.com on 2009-09-22 11:22:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362103) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362103) expected.jpg --- Additional comment from twaugh(a)redhat.com on 2009-09-22 11:23:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362105) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362105) 132.txt --- Additional comment from twaugh(a)redhat.com on 2009-09-22 11:24:05 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362106) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362106) actual.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-10-19 15:15:48 EDT --- gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-10-19 15:07:32 EDT --- gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-10-19 15:00:07 EDT --- gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2009-10-19 12:27:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #63 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-19 05:27:08 EDT --- @Baif: so this is ok now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> 2009-10-19 04:20:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gargi-fonts Short Description: A Free Unicode OpenType Font Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-12 F-11 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> 2009-10-19 04:17:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Ankur, > > This version is good. If you hear from upstream make them write a better > description. I'll recontact them. Lets hope for a reply this time. > > ⚺⚺⚺ APPROVED ⚺⚺⚺ > > You can continue from > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a > Continuing from here. > I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package other > fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our > organisation on the fonts mailing list. > Yup, it was pleasant and I'm going to continue packaging fonts :) . You're taking good care of the fonts-sig, I really have no improvements to point out yet. :) > Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. > > ⇒ REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485566] [CJK] Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering ASCII glyphs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-19 04:15:22 EDT --- Some simple testcases from bug 529594: LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8 pango-view --font="Monospace" <(echo -e "my@ip-1-2-3 ~$\n @@ 1 2 3") LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 pango-view --font="Monospace" <(echo -e "my@ip-1-2-3 ~$\n @@ 1 2 3") LANG=ko_KR.UTF-8 pango-view --font="Monospace" <(echo -e "my@ip-1-2-3 ~$\n @@ 1 2 3") also good without --font option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485566] [CJK] Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering ASCII glyphs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |phuang(a)redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-19 04:09:59 EDT --- *** Bug 529594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 485566] [CJK] Fontconfig should select DejaVu font for rendering ASCII glyphs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485566 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide Summary|Fontconfig should select |[CJK] Fontconfig should |DejaVu font for rendering |select DejaVu font for |English, even in Japanese |rendering ASCII glyphs |locale. | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 529127] New: [Indic][Various] Default font in oowriter is not Language Default (Lohit or Other), but DejaVu Sans
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Indic][Various] Default font in oowriter is not Language Default (Lohit or Other), but DejaVu Sans https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529127 Summary: [Indic][Various] Default font in oowriter is not Language Default (Lohit or Other), but DejaVu Sans Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: openoffice.org AssignedTo: caolanm(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caolanm(a)redhat.com, dtardon(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Depends on: 528409 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 528409 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #528409 +++ Description of problem: While using Sinhala Desktop (si_LK), oowriter is showing DejaVu Sans, even when input sinhala, it is showing that font, while 'LKLUG' is present in font list, $fc-match lklug.ttf: "LKLUG" "Regular" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): openoffice.org-writer-3.1.1-19.fc12 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. start oowriter with si_LK.UTF-8 locale 2. check Default font 3. Actual results: which is DejaVu Sans Expected results: LKLUG Additional info: --- Additional comment from dtardon(a)redhat.com on 2009-10-12 03:18:52 EDT --- There is no default font configuration for si_LK. --- Additional comment from dtardon(a)redhat.com on 2009-10-12 03:44:52 EDT --- fix checked in, will be in >= 3.2.0-1.1 --------- UPDATE [15Oct2009] Various Indic Languages are also effected (list below): -as_IN -bn_IN -kn_IN -mr_IN -ml_IN -mai_IN -te_IN Font List for these Language: as_IN - Lohit-Assamese bn_IN - Lohit-Bengali kn_IN - Lohit-Kannada mr_IN - Lohit-Marathi ml_IN - Meera mai_IN - Lohit-Mathili te_IN - Lohit-telugu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 528409] New: [si_LK] Default font in oowriter is not Language Default (LKLUG), but DejaVu Sans
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [si_LK] Default font in oowriter is not Language Default (LKLUG), but DejaVu Sans https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528409 Summary: [si_LK] Default font in oowriter is not Language Default (LKLUG), but DejaVu Sans Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: openoffice.org AssignedTo: caolanm(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caolanm(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: While using Sinhala Desktop (si_LK), oowriter is showing DejaVu Sans, even when input sinhala, it is showing that font, while 'LKLUG' is present in font list, $fc-match lklug.ttf: "LKLUG" "Regular" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): openoffice.org-writer-3.1.1-19.fc12 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. start oowriter with si_LK.UTF-8 locale 2. check Default font 3. Actual results: which is DejaVu Sans Expected results: LKLUG Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 525498] New: wrongly encoding glyphs after U+10000
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Oct '09

18 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: wrongly encoding glyphs after U+10000 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498 Summary: wrongly encoding glyphs after U+10000 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: moyogo(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Since 1.04 the codepoints U+10000...U+10013 in Liberation Sans, U+10000...U+1000B in Liberation Serif, and U+10000...U+1000E in Liberation Mono, are filled with characters that used to be out of bound. The glyph don't actually match the codepoints. For example U+10005 LINEAR B SYLLABLE B001 DA is a fraction four in LiberationSans-Regular. The error was probably introduced when the font encoding went from Unicode BMP to Unicode Full. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 528368] New: Duplicate "Provides" entries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Oct '09

18 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Duplicate "Provides" entries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528368 Summary: Duplicate "Provides" entries Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: matt(a)mattmccutchen.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Each of the packages liberation-mono-fonts, liberation-sans-fonts, liberation-serif-fonts contains a duplicate "provide" for its own name-version-release in addition to the one implicitly generated by rpm. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-serif-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-sans-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-mono-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -q --provides -a 'liberation-*-fonts' | grep '^liberation' Actual results: liberation-serif-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 liberation-serif-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 liberation-sans-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 liberation-sans-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 liberation-mono-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 liberation-mono-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 Expected results: liberation-serif-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 liberation-sans-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 liberation-mono-fonts = 1.04.93-10.fc11 Additional info: It looks like this has already been fixed in rawhide in liberation-fonts-1.04.93-11, according to the spec file in CVS: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel/liberation-… So feel free to mark this CLOSED RAWHIDE if you don't wish to make the fix for Fedora 11. I thought I'd ask because the duplicate provides came up when I was doing some checks on my RPM database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 529144] New: [mai_IN] Input Method is not working for Mailthili (after Fresh install)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Oct '09

17 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [mai_IN] Input Method is not working for Mailthili (after Fresh install) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529144 Summary: [mai_IN] Input Method is not working for Mailthili (after Fresh install) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: After installing Maithili from today's rawhide, Ibus is not working in mai_IN locale By Default, while it is working if tried to login in Hindi locale. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc12.x86_64 m17n-contrib-maithili-1.1.10-2.fc12.noarch How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Fresh install with (in) Maithili Language 2. login in Maithili Destkop 3. check im-chooser Actual results: ibus is not working ( im-choose has not enabled by default) Expected results: Ibus should work for this locale Additional info: after enabling once with im-chooser, it is working, but default keymap not added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226639] Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Oct '09

17 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226639 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mcepl(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226639] Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Oct '09

17 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226639 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net --- Comment #4 from Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-17 16:42:07 EDT --- *** Bug 437689 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Oct '09

16 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net |sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-10-16 16:55:48 EDT --- Ankur, I hope you've recovered completely and are well now There is absolutely no problem with a review sleeping some time, what's not ok is making someone work on a review then vanishing, but as long as you come back in a reasonable delay everything is fine. This version is good. If you hear from upstream make them write a better description. ⚺⚺⚺ APPROVED ⚺⚺⚺ You can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. ⇒ REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Oct '09

16 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> 2009-10-16 05:53:53 EDT --- hi, Sorry for the delay, got stuck in bed wid flu :( Fixed up whatever I could, - fontconfig - given prio as 69 (lowest?, hope that isnt tooo low) - fixed license to gplv2+, no response from upstream about it yet, - no idea what to write in there to juice up the description, sorry. spec: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/gargi/gargi-fonts.spec srpm: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/gargi/gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc11.src.rpm the rest: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/gargi/ regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526918] New: update to ibus breaks eee pc suspend
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Oct '09

13 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: update to ibus breaks eee pc suspend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526918 Summary: update to ibus breaks eee pc suspend Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jon.fairbairn(a)cl.cam.ac.uk QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: After recent upgrade to ibus, eee pc won't come back from suspend. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 ibus-libs-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 ibus-gtk-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 ibus-rawcode-1.2.0.20090703-1.fc11.i586 ibus-m17n-1.2.0.20090617-2.fc11.i586 ibus-hangul-1.2.0.20090617-2.fc11.i586 ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-2.fc11.i586 How reproducible: After updating to above versions every suspend I tried failed to resume. Steps to Reproduce: 1. upgrade ibus-* 2. suspend machine from "battery/mains" icon 3. press shift Actual results: Fan whirrs briefly then stops and power light goes from flasing to continuous, but screen remains blank and there is no disc access. Power button doesn't turn machine off, hard reset required. Expected results: Fan whirrs briefly and then continues to whirr at a lower level for a while, disc access happens and the desktop reappears. Additional info: Downgrading to these versions: ibus-libs-1.1.0.20090423-1.fc11.i586 ibus-1.1.0.20090423-1.fc11.i586 ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-2.fc11.i586 ibus-gtk-1.1.0.20090423-1.fc11.i586 ibus-chewing-1.0.10.20090523-2.fc11.i586 ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-4.fc11.i586 ibus-anthy-1.1.0.20090402-1.fc11.i586 ibus-pinyin-1.1.0.20090303-1.fc11.noarch ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.i586 resolved the problem. I haven't repeated the upgrade/downgrade cycle because it takes quite a while and the downgraded version works (which is what I like, really), so I can't say that I've tested this extensively. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 227792] Chewing - similar glyphs in different locales are all listed in candidate list.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Oct '09

13 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227792 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dchen(a)redhat.com, | |phuang(a)redhat.com Component|scim-chewing |ibus-chewing QAContact| |extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-13 02:45:16 EDT --- Moving to ibus-chewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Oct '09

12 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-13 00:50:49 EDT --- I tried with F11 x86_64 (on a 19" 1280x1024 display): $ LANG=en_US.UTF-8 pango-view --waterfall --text "LANG=en_US 糓䶜" This displays okay for me, but: > LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8 pango-view --waterfall --text "LANG=zh_TW 糓䶜" hangs before rendering the first (smallest) 糓. On rawhide with 17" monitor: similar results except LANG=en_US hangs after first 糓. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 528482] New: X freezes at startup or later on Intel hardware (82G33) - Fedora 11.91
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Oct '09

12 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: X freezes at startup or later on Intel hardware (82G33) - Fedora 11.91 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528482 Summary: X freezes at startup or later on Intel hardware (82G33) - Fedora 11.91 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: nabi AssignedTo: arya.subhransu(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: pproche(a)gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, arya.subhransu(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: X hangs at startup or just randomly after a while, blank sreen, no mouse pointer, keyboard dead Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.9.0-2.fc12.x86_64 How reproducible: Always: X hangs first at startup, after rebooting the second or third startup works fine, then X crashes randomly some time afterwards Steps to Reproduce: --- Actual results: --- Expected results: --- Additional info: The problem occurs generally in all window managers: FVWM, Gnome, Xfce, but mostly in FVWM. Xfce seems to be the most stable. After logging in at the console ans starting for example FVWM, the graphical display flashes up for a split second, the the screen goes blank. If I reboot and start X again, it is usually working, but freezes randomly later. Killing X is not possible because keyboard or mouse are not working anymore. Sometimes (especially when X crashes later), the control lamps on the keyboard blink. The system itself does not crash, I can log in via ssh, save the xorg-log (see attachment) and reboot. Killing X via ssh does not solve anything. I found a description of a similar problem once, and the solution was to downgrade DRM packages, tried this, but it did not work. Installed X components: xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-75dpi-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-server-common-1.7.0-1.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.1-2.noarch xorg-x11-drv-sis-0.10.2-1.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-proto-devel-7.4-31.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.7.0-1.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-misc-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-twm-1.0.3-5.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-keyboard-1.3.99.1-1.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-drv-void-1.3.0-2.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-vga-4.1.0-2.1.x86_64 xorg-x11-xauth-1.0.2-7.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.903-16.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-75dpi-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-server-utils-7.4-11.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse-12.6.5-2.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-font-utils-7.2-9.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-apps-7.4-5.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-mouse-1.4.99.1-2.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-Type1-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-xkb-utils-7.4-5.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-100dpi-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-drv-sisusb-0.9.3-1.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-75dpi-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-xdm-1.1.6-14.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-vesa-2.2.1-1.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-vmware-10.16.7-2.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-syriac-7.1-2.noarch xorg-x11-drv-ast-0.89.9-1.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-100dpi-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-utils-7.4-6.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-dummy-0.3.2-3.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-cyrillic-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.9.0-2.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-xfs-utils-1.0.5-6.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-evdev-2.2.99-8.20090923.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi-7.2-9.fc12.noarch xorg-x11-xinit-1.0.9-12.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-xfs-1.0.5-6.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-nv-2.1.15-1.fc12.x86_64 Output of lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express DRAM Controller (rev 02) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31 Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31 Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) 00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 (rev 02) 00:1a.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 (rev 02) 00:1a.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #6 (rev 02) 00:1a.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 (rev 02) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 02) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 02) 00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 5 (rev 02) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 02) 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 02) 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #3 (rev 02) 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #1 (rev 02) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev 92) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801IB (ICH9) LPC Interface Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801IB (ICH9) 2 port SATA IDE Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.5 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) 2 port SATA IDE Controller (rev 02) 02:00.0 IDE interface: JMicron Technologies, Inc. JMB368 IDE controller 03:05.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8110SC/8169SC Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 03:07.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB23 IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link) Output of uname -a: Linux CARACAS 2.6.31-i64 #2 Sun Sep 27 15:38:16 CEST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Oct '09

12 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium CC| |dchen(a)redhat.com Component|fontconfig |pango AssignedTo|dchen(a)redhat.com |besfahbo(a)redhat.com Severity|medium |high --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-12 20:34:38 EDT --- Moving to pango. This is x86_64 only and looks serious. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Oct '09

12 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #20 from CW Lin <chinwen_lin(a)yahoo.com> 2009-10-12 12:26:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364487) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364487) Missing Characters in pango-view #! /bin/bash LANG=en_US.UTF-8 pango-view --waterfall --text "LANG=en_US 淿糓䶜" & LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8 pango-view --waterfall --text "LANG=zh_TW 淿糓䶜" & -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Oct '09

12 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #19 from CW Lin <chinwen_lin(a)yahoo.com> 2009-10-12 12:12:19 EDT --- I am glad to know that this bug was reproduced and you are trying to work it out. My personal experience is that this bug also appears in the gnome-terminal and pango-view. I will show it later. Two months ago, I reported a bug 516360 that some Traditional Chinese characters will disappear within Firefox . Now I think it may be a duplicate of this bug. Perhaps you can look into the bug 516360 to see if it can be of any help. For the time being, if some Chinese characters disappear in Firefox, I will try to adjust the font size, pressing Ctrl-+ or Ctrl-- until the missing characters show up. That should be the easiest workaround to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Oct '09

12 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #18 from Ding-Yi Chen <dchen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-12 07:51:05 EDT --- Sorry prm.pbone.net should be rpm.pbone.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Oct '09

12 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #17 from Ding-Yi Chen <dchen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-12 04:09:32 EDT --- We managed to reproduce the bugs with F-11 and Rawhide x86_64 Live iso. It does not have to be in zh_TW.UTF-8, in fact, if the font is sufficient small, (e.g. 10,11), there is quite a good chance this bug will pop up. We also find that this bug appears in gucharmap, gdm, and gnome-menu; but not gnome-terminal, gedit, and pango-view. We are still investigate the cause. However, there are workaround for this bug, you can either: 1) Downgrade cjkunifont packages for F-9, these packages can still be found, for example, in fedora CVS (for building material) and prm.pbone.net (packed rpm). 2) If you don't really want bitmap fonts, remove /etc/fonts/conf.d/25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf. Would you mind trying these? Regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Oct '09

11 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-10-11 17:21:11 EDT --- 1. needs xorg-x11-font-utils as BR 2. You have some stray "fixed" font in bitmap-console-fonts 3. Some of the files in bitmap-console-fonts declare their name as "console8x8.pcf" which is almost certainly a bug 4. The Lucida Typewriter fonts in bitmap-fonts should be pushed in a bitmap-lucida-typewriter-fonts subpackage 5. It would be nice if each subpackage included its own fontconfig file 6. you can probably kill the common file and put each license %doc in the corresponding subpackage (just put the %doc line after the corresponding %_font_pkg call). You just need to have each subpackage require fontpackages-filesystem direcly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 527719] New: [pa_IN] English Characters are bad in shape with Punjabi
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Oct '09

10 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [pa_IN] English Characters are bad in shape with Punjabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527719 Summary: [pa_IN] English Characters are bad in shape with Punjabi Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: openoffice.org AssignedTo: caolanm(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caolanm(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=363967) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363967) Image with en-US and pa-IN rendering Description of problem English Characters are Bad shape, while using localized Interface with langpack Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): openoffice.org-langpack-pa_IN-3.1.1-19.10.fc12.x86_64 How reproducible: Evertime Steps to Reproduce: 1. in gnome-terminal, export LANG=pa_IN.UTF-8 (yum groupinstall punjabi-support) 2. run oowriter 3. check the Menu/Submenu Actual results: English Characters are in Bad Shape Expected results: Good shape Additional info: There is bug for windows, may it effected http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104034 Please check above issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468964] New: scim-python-pinyin db file too big!
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '09

09 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: scim-python-pinyin db file too big! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468964 Summary: scim-python-pinyin db file too big! Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: scim-python AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The py.db file in scim-python-pinyin is 120MB it seems very big: eg scim-pinyin Steps to Reproduce: 1. du -sh /usr/share/scim-python/engine/PinYin 2. du -sh /usr/share/scim/pinyin Actual results: 1. 121M 2. 4.5M Expected results: 1. similar to scim-pinyin Additional info: This means we can't currently use scim-python-pinyin as default IM on Live images. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '09

09 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #16 from CW Lin <chinwen_lin(a)yahoo.com> 2009-10-09 14:33:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=364281) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364281) Messy Display from Fresh Install of F11 x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '09

09 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #15 from CW Lin <chinwen_lin(a)yahoo.com> 2009-10-09 13:46:32 EDT --- This bug can be reproduced from a fresh install too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 458949] [kok-IN] Locale file for Konkani is not available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '09

09 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458949 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '09

09 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-09 04:33:23 EDT --- If you can reproduce from a fresh install that would be useful to know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466876] An IOException occurred at scim_bridge_client_imcontext_set_cursor_location
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '09

09 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466876 --- Comment #8 from Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas(a)fi.muni.cz> 2009-10-09 04:27:36 EDT --- I can reproduce the bug as described in comment #2 on a F11 system with F10 scim-bridge: scim-bridge-0.4.15-8.fc10.x86_64 scim-bridge-gtk-0.4.15-8.fc10.x86_64 scim-bridge-gtk-0.4.15-8.fc10.i386 I will try ibus later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '09

09 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #13 from CW Lin <chinwen_lin(a)yahoo.com> 2009-10-09 04:14:30 EDT --- I think you did not select the language "Chinese (Taiwan) - 繁體中文". If so, to reproduce this bug, the environment variable LANG has to be changed to "zh_TW.UTF-8". Before you start the program "gucharmap", make sure the following configuration is set: (1) System -> Administration -> Appearance -> Fonts -> Application Font: "Sans 10" (2) System -> Administration -> Appearance -> Fonts -> Details -> Resolutions: "96" dots per inch To see the messy display, enter the following command: $ LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8 gucharmap If you enter "LANG=en_US.UTF-8 gucharmap", this bug will not be reproduced. Also remember to set the font in gucharmap to "Sans". Then change the size in gucharmap to 12, 11, 10 sequentially. Now you should be able to reproduce the bug. By the way, the output of "rpm -qa \*fonts\* pango fontconfig | sort" on my machine is as follows: abyssinica-fonts-1.0-4.fc11.noarch bitmap-fonts-0.3-7.fc11.noarch cjkuni-ukai-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-26.fc11.noarch cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-26.fc11.noarch dejavu-fonts-common-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-sans-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-sans-mono-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-serif-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc11.i586 fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc11.x86_64 ghostscript-fonts-5.50-20.fc11.noarch jomolhari-fonts-0.003-7.fc11.noarch kacst-fonts-2.0-2.fc11.noarch khmeros-base-fonts-5.0-6.fc11.noarch khmeros-fonts-common-5.0-6.fc11.noarch liberation-fonts-common-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-mono-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-sans-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-serif-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch lklug-fonts-0.2.2-9.fc11.noarch lohit-bengali-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-fonts-common-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-gujarati-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-kannada-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-maithili-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-oriya-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-punjabi-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-tamil-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch lohit-telugu-fonts-2.4.0-1.fc11.noarch openoffice.org-opensymbol-fonts-3.1.1-19.2.fc11.x86_64 padauk-fonts-2.4-3.fc11.noarch paktype-fonts-2.0-3.fc11.noarch pango-1.24.5-1.fc11.i586 pango-1.24.5-1.fc11.x86_64 smc-fonts-common-04.1-6.fc11.noarch smc-meera-fonts-04.1-6.fc11.noarch stix-fonts-0.9-12.fc11.noarch thai-scalable-fonts-common-0.4.11-3.fc11.noarch thai-scalable-waree-fonts-0.4.11-3.fc11.noarch un-core-fonts-dotum-1.0.2-0.8.080608.fc11.noarch urw-fonts-2.4-7.fc11.noarch vlgothic-fonts-20090612-1.fc11.noarch vlgothic-fonts-common-20090612-1.fc11.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '09

09 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #22 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-09 02:29:37 EDT --- just saw comment #9 , license for Console is given there update files are as follows http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts.spec http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts-0.3-12.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '09

09 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Bug 225617 depends on bug 481068, which changed state. Bug 481068 Summary: bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '09

09 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-09 01:55:05 EDT --- if any problem reopen bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #21 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-09 00:57:52 EDT --- thanks for clarification bitmap fonts also has Console fonts from fixfont tarball README just says "fonts from kdebase/konsole/fonts from kde 3.5" what will be the License of these fonts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #12 from Ding-Yi Chen <dchen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-09 00:14:39 EDT --- On affected machine, gdm login screen: 1. In language selection, select 中文 (台灣), which might shows like comment #6. 2. Login to the system. 3. cat /var/log/gdm/:0-greeter.log, there will be a line, such like: gdm-simple-greeter[7797]: Pango-WARNING: shaping failure, expect ugly output. shape-engine='BasicEngineFc', font='AR PL UMing HK Light Oblique 8.33203125', text='中文 (台灣)' Regards, Ding-Yi Chen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|besfahbo(a)redhat.com |dchen(a)redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-09 00:03:02 EDT --- I haven't been able to reproduce this yet: though I saw the gdm issue on dchen's machine. CW Lin: what does "rpm -qa \*fonts\* pango fontconfig | sort" Output for you? With F11 x86_86 install without updates I have: abyssinica-fonts-1.0-4.fc11.noarch bitmap-fonts-0.3-7.fc11.noarch cjkuni-fonts-common-0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11.noarch cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-23.fc11.noarch dejavu-fonts-common-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-sans-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-sans-mono-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch dejavu-serif-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc11.i586 fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc11.x86_64 ghostscript-fonts-5.50-20.fc11.noarch jomolhari-fonts-0.003-7.fc11.noarch kacst-fonts-2.0-2.fc11.noarch khmeros-base-fonts-5.0-6.fc11.noarch khmeros-fonts-common-5.0-6.fc11.noarch liberation-fonts-common-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-mono-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-sans-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch liberation-serif-fonts-1.04.93-10.fc11.noarch lklug-fonts-0.2.2-9.fc11.noarch lohit-bengali-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-fonts-common-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-gujarati-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-hindi-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-kannada-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-maithili-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-oriya-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-punjabi-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-tamil-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch lohit-telugu-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch padauk-fonts-2.4-3.fc11.noarch paktype-fonts-2.0-3.fc11.noarch pango-1.24.5-1.fc11.i586 pango-1.24.5-1.fc11.x86_64 smc-fonts-common-04.1-6.fc11.noarch smc-meera-fonts-04.1-6.fc11.noarch stix-fonts-0.9-12.fc11.noarch thai-scalable-fonts-common-0.4.11-3.fc11.noarch thai-scalable-waree-fonts-0.4.11-3.fc11.noarch un-core-fonts-dotum-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc11.noarch urw-fonts-2.4-7.fc11.noarch vlgothic-fonts-20090204-3.fc11.noarch vlgothic-fonts-common-20090204-3.fc11.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466876] An IOException occurred at scim_bridge_client_imcontext_set_cursor_location
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466876 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-08 23:53:49 EDT --- (Additional comment: our general advice would be to switch to ibus though - we are not really supporting scim as the primary input method system in fedora.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466876] An IOException occurred at scim_bridge_client_imcontext_set_cursor_location
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466876 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-08 23:51:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I think this started in F11 for me Could you try to reproduce with the scim-bridge from f10 then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-08 09:32:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Licensing > ========== > > * 10x20.bdf, 4x6.bdf, 5x7.bdf, 5x8.bdf, 6x10.bdf, 6x12.bdf, 6x13B.bdf, > 6x13.bdf, 6x9.bdf, 7x14B.bdf, 7x14.bdf, 9x15B.bdf, 9x15.bdf, 9x18B.bdf, > 9x18.bdf : Public Domain > * fangsongti16.bdf, fangsongti24.bdf : MIT > * lutBS*.bdf : Lucida and... lutRS*.bdf : Lucida -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #19 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-08 09:32:21 EDT --- Licensing ========== * 10x20.bdf, 4x6.bdf, 5x7.bdf, 5x8.bdf, 6x10.bdf, 6x12.bdf, 6x13B.bdf, 6x13.bdf, 6x9.bdf, 7x14B.bdf, 7x14.bdf, 9x15B.bdf, 9x15.bdf, 9x18B.bdf, 9x18.bdf : Public Domain * fangsongti16.bdf, fangsongti24.bdf : MIT * lutBS*.bdf : Lucida -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 522689] New: many zombie process of ibus-daemon and scim
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: many zombie process of ibus-daemon and scim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522689 Summary: many zombie process of ibus-daemon and scim Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: phuang(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: many zombie process of ibus-daemon and scim Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: imsettings-0.107.3-1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. run im-chooser 2. switch between scim and ibus continually 3. ps aux |grep defunct Actual results: Found a lot of zombie processes of scim and ibus Expected results: No zombie processes Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 521753] New: Typos & Context Clarification Required for Effective Translations
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Typos & Context Clarification Required for Effective Translations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521753 Summary: Typos & Context Clarification Required for Effective Translations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: runab(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Quite a few of the strings in the imsettings.po file available for translation for Fedora 12 contain typographical errors, and may need a rewrite to either correct their grammatical syntax or fully understand the reference to their context. The .pot file is here: https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/imsettings/trunk/ direct link: https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/imsettings/trunk/raw/po/imsett… The strings are mentioned below along with their source reference: ---------------------------------------------- #: ../applet/imsettings-applet.schemas.in.h:3 msgid "" "If false, all of informations will not delivered through libnotify, except " "error and warning messages." ----------------------------------------------- #: ../applet/imsettings-applet.schemas.in.h:7 msgid "" "When this option is enabled, all of key events will be sent to Input Method " "synchronously. This might affects a performance." ------------------------------------------------ #: ../applet/main.c:714 msgid "" "When this option is enabled, all of key events will be sent to Input Method " "synchronously. this might affects a performance." ------------------------------------------------ #: ../applet/main.c:990 #, c-format msgid "Please %s%s" ------------------------------------------------- #: ../backends/xim/proxy.c:2969 msgid "A XIM server name would connects to" ------------------------------------------------- #: ../src/factory.c:1295 msgid "A directory where puts the system wide xinputrc on." -------------------------------------------------- #: ../src/factory.c:1301 msgid "A directory where puts the IM configurations on." --------------------------------------------------- #: ../src/factory.c:1408 msgid "A directory where puts the system-wide xinputrc puts on (debugging only)" ---------------------------------------------------- #: ../utils/imsettings-info.c:61 ../utils/imsettings-list.c:58 #: ../utils/imsettings-restart.c:84 ../utils/imsettings-start.c:85 #: ../utils/imsettings-stop.c:83 #, c-format msgid "" "Mismatch the version of imsettings.\n" "Run imsettings-reload -f may resolves this issue but be aware that will ends " "up to restart Input Method too\n" ------------------------------------------------------ Additional Info: 1. There are quite a few strings, where Capitalization was missed after a full-stop. 2. Correcting this may break string freeze for Fedora - 12. Thanks Runa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 520976] New: [abrt] crash detected in imsettings-0.107.3-1.fc12
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [abrt] crash detected in imsettings-0.107.3-1.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520976 Summary: [abrt] crash detected in imsettings-0.107.3-1.fc12 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:434daf6f90a64bf4131efae139064d9de4a1ac1d Severity: medium Priority: low Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: john.ellson(a)comcast.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora abrt detected a crash. How to reproduce ----- 1. 2. 3. Comment ----- I've no idea. Why is this running anyway? How do i turn it off? Additional information ====== cmdline ----- /usr/libexec/im-settings-daemon component ----- imsettings executable ----- /usr/libexec/im-settings-daemon kernel ----- 2.6.30.5-32.fc11.x86_64 package ----- imsettings-0.107.3-1.fc12 reason ----- Process was terminated by signal 6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 518970] New: problems starting ibus
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: problems starting ibus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518970 Summary: problems starting ibus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=358445) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=358445) .imsettings.log Description of problem: With the latest ibus and imsettings in rawhide a bubble is appearing for me at startup that ibus startup failed because of spawning too many ibus processes. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): imsettings-0.107.1-2.fc12 ibus-1.2.0.20090812-1.fc12 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. login to desktop Actual results: warning bubble appears Expected results: ibus to be running normally -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 514852] New: im-chooser recommends both IBus and SCIM immediately after IBus installation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: im-chooser recommends both IBus and SCIM immediately after IBus installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514852 Summary: im-chooser recommends both IBus and SCIM immediately after IBus installation Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: im-chooser AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: harshula(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: im-chooser recommends both IBus and SCIM immediately after IBus installation. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): * im-chooser-1.2.6-3.fc11.x86_64 How reproducible: * Once. But I suspect if you uninstall IBus and reinstall it, you would be able to reproduce it. Steps to Reproduce: 0. Upgrade from F10 to F11. 1. Open IM chooser and only see SCIM mentioned with "(recommended)" next to it. 2. yum groupinstall sinhala-support 3. Re-open IM chooser (I can't remember if I closed it before (2) or after (2)) Actual results: * im-chooser states: "Use SCIM (recommended)" and "Use IBus (recommended)" Expected results: * im-chooser stating: "Use SCIM" and "Use IBus (recommended)" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 500760] New: UI bug of "Enable input method" checkbox
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: UI bug of "Enable input method" checkbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500760 Summary: UI bug of "Enable input method" checkbox Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus-pinyin AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: lili(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jlaska(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=343902) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343902) UI of ibus Description of problem: In"Enable input method" checkbox,some words are not clear, have some empty string in the sentence Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1.Choose System->Preferences->Input Method (or run im-chooser) 2. "Enable input method" checkbox pops up 3. check the UI ,see more from attached image. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 497946] New: ibus-daemon should not fail silently
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-daemon should not fail silently https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497946 Summary: ibus-daemon should not fail silently Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: wtogami(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- ibus-1.1.0.20090423-1.fc11 Currently ibus-daemon can fail to startup under certain circumstances like socket directory owned by another user. It currently fails silently, so the user has no idea why it failed. ibus-daemon should pop-up and tell the user it failed to start, and why. ibus-daemon should probably run: ibus-x11 --fail "fail message here" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466876] An IOException occurred at scim_bridge_client_imcontext_set_cursor_location
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466876 Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas(a)fi.muni.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kas(a)fi.muni.cz --- Comment #5 from Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas(a)fi.muni.cz> 2009-10-08 03:26:16 EDT --- I have the similar (maybe the same) problem, but unrelated to totem: from time to time scim-bridge crashes, leaving all my gnome-terminals, galeon, and the mini_commander_applet without the keyboard input. I can switch to the text console, and in "ps ax|grep scim" I see the following processes: 3514 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-helper-manager 3515 ? Ssl 0:00 /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk --display :0.0 -c socket -d --no-stay 3517 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-launcher -d -c socket -e socket -f x11 --no-stay -d When I kill the scim-launcher process, all the processes get restarted, leading to the following "ps ax|grep scim" output: 7204 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-helper-manager 7205 ? Ssl 0:00 /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-panel-gtk --display :0.0 -c socket -d --no-stay 7207 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-launcher -d -c socket -e socket -f x11 --no-stay -d 7209 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/lib64/scim-1.0/scim-launcher -d -c simple -e all -f socket --no-stay -d 7210 ? S 0:00 scim-bridge and since then, the text input to gnome-terminal, galeon, and all the other GNOME apps works fine. The relevant part of .xsession-errors is probably the following one (altough I am not sure - I am writing this bug report some time after the last scim-bridge crash): =============================== Failed to receive messages at scim_bridge_client_read_and_dispatch () An IOException occurred at handle_message () Failed to receive messages at scim_bridge_client_read_and_dispatch () An IOException occurred at handle_message () Failed to receive messages at scim_bridge_client_read_and_dispatch () An IOException occurred at handle_message () Failed to receive messages at scim_bridge_client_read_and_dispatch () An IOException occurred at handle_message () Failed to receive messages at scim_bridge_client_read_and_dispatch () An IOException at scim_bridge_client_change_focus () An IOException occurred at scim_bridge_client_imcontext_focus_out () The messenger is now down ** Message: Active session changed ** Message: Active session changed An IOException at scim_bridge_messenger_receive_message (): Connection reset by peer Failed to receive messages at scim_bridge_client_read_and_dispatch () An IOException at scim_bridge_client_register_imcontext () Cannot register the IMContexts... nt_register_imcontext () Cannot register the IMContexts... The messenger is now down Loading socket Config module ... Creating backend ... Loading x11 FrontEnd module ... GTK Panel of SCIM 1.4.8 Starting SCIM as daemon ... Loading simple Config module ... Creating backend ... Loading socket FrontEnd module ... Starting SCIM as daemon ... =============================== I think this started in F11 for me (I use scim-bridge for a longer time). Also, my system is x86_64, so the Platform: attribute of this bug can be changed to "All". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Oct '09

08 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #18 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-08 01:25:27 EDT --- updated SPEC : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts.spec updated SRPM : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts-0.3-11.fc11.src.rpm different license for each subpackage is done in smc-fonts, but i am not sure about license of these fonts, please guide if anything -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Oct '09

07 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-07 23:34:21 EDT --- Changing Desktop Font has no effect on gucharmap for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 527340] New: Keys (on iok) are not input character with double (or more) click
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Oct '09

07 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Keys (on iok) are not input character with double (or more) click https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527340 Summary: Keys (on iok) are not input character with double (or more) click Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Desktop, i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Most of keys with iok is not allowing to input more than one character, if you double click on it. for English Key-map, when you press : (2nd key from Enter) two times, it is not showing character at gedit (when using iok to input in gedit). very few keys are working, but randomly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): iok-1.3.7-1.fc12 How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. run iok (I had gedit with English Desktop) 2. press k or j or o 2-4 or more times 3. Actual results: only Single Character appear Expected results: multiple character should appear equal to number of click on button Additional info: Supported languages (by iok) has same issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Oct '09

07 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #9 from CW Lin <chinwen_lin(a)yahoo.com> 2009-10-07 04:00:04 EDT --- This bug can be reproduced with x86_64 F12 too, It is easy to reproduce this bug. Just do the clean installation with the language of "Traditional Chinese". Set DPI to 96. Set font Size to "10, 10, 14, 10, 10" as mentioned in the bug description. Launch the program "gucharmap". Search the character U+7CD3 "糓" Change the size to 12, 11 and 10, sequentially. And you will see the messy display. If you are too busy to install F12 with "Traditional Chinese", I can do the installation for you. Please provide a virtual machine with "Fedora-12-Alpha-x86_64-DVD.iso" and let me know how to access it. Thanks for the effort of fixing this annoying bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 523945] New: [as_IN] Date Data Mixed with % sign for each date
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Oct '09

06 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [as_IN] Date Data Mixed with % sign for each date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523945 Summary: [as_IN] Date Data Mixed with % sign for each date Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: system-config-date AssignedTo: nphilipp(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: nphilipp(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=361475) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361475) Screenshot for Date with % sign Description of problem: for Assamese Language, Each Date is mixed with % sign, when you run 'system-config-date' in Assamese locale. it is shown like 2% 3% 4% Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): tzdata-2009k-3.fc12.noarch glibc-2.10.90-22.x86_64 system-config-date-1.9.49-1.fc12.noarch How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. change locale as 'export LANG=as_IN.UTF-8' 2. run application 'system-config-date' 3. Actual results: Date is shown with % sign (screen-shot attached) Expected results: Should without % Sign Additional info: Screenshot Not very sure which package it belongs, so start with 's-c-date' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 239414] illogical mapping for non-QWERTY keyboard with m17n
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Oct '09

06 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239414 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-06 05:36:34 EDT --- In recent ibus including f11 in ibus-setup you can now click on the "Advanced" tab and uncheck "Use system keyboard layout". Then ibus will override AZERTY when using ibus-m17n and you can input Hindi inscript, etc in the standard way. So this is a viable workaround for now. In the longer term we would like to make this per m17n map and automatic but we are not quite there yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 519317] AR PL UMing HK Light does not show properly in x86_64
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Oct '09

06 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519317 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-06 05:22:56 EDT --- Can you reproduce with F12? If so can you provide Behdad with access please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526420] New: [ml_IN] - Window title appearing with underline for smc-meera-font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Oct '09

06 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN] - Window title appearing with underline for smc-meera-font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526420 Summary: [ml_IN] - Window title appearing with underline for smc-meera-font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gnome-themes AssignedTo: mclasen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apeter(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mclasen(a)redhat.com, apeter(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, smc-discuss(a)googlegroups.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=363141) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363141) Screenshot for Meera with default Fedora theme Description of problem: For any editor e.g. oowriter, gedit, when smc-meera-font is used with "fedora" (default) theme and "glossy" theme, underline sppears below the title, making the window look ugly. Screenshots of Meera with both themes attached. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): metacity-2.28.0-1.fc12.i686 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login system with malayalam locale. (ml_IN) 2. Go to System --> Preferences --> Appearance 3. Select Theme as "glossy" 4. Open and observe any editor or the theme window title itself. Actual results: The Underline appears on the Title Window with meera font and clearlooks combination. Expected results: Underline should not appear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526396] New: [ml_IN] - Editor's Title appearing with Underline for smc-meera-font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Oct '09

06 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ml_IN] - Editor's Title appearing with Underline for smc-meera-font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526396 Summary: [ml_IN] - Editor's Title appearing with Underline for smc-meera-font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme AssignedTo: sindrepb(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smaitra(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: sindrepb(a)fedoraproject.org, apeter(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=363117) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363117) The affected theme snapshot with meera font Description of problem: For any editor e.g. oowriter, gedit, when smc-meera-font is selected, its showing underline below the Title, making the editor look ugly. Seems a clearlooks-compact-gnome-theme bug. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): metacity-2.26.0-1.fc11.i586 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login system with malayalam locale. (ml_IN) 2. Go to System --> Preferences --> Appearance 3. Select Theme as "Clearlooks" 4. Open and Observe any editor or the theme window title itself. Actual results: The Underline appears on the Title Window with meera font and clearlooks combination. Expected results: Underline should not appear. Additional info: Its OK with all other ml_IN font and other themes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 525035] Selected language is not implemented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Oct '09

06 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525035 --- Comment #14 from Noriko Mizumoto <noriko(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-06 03:49:41 EDT --- Pravin, thank you for finding the cause! I now fully understood what happened. 'liveinst' was failed and the bug 525022 has been filed. This has already been resolved. Thus next review for F13, we should have successful 'liveinst' first, then we can get working s-c-l. Thank you again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 525035] Selected language is not implemented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Oct '09

06 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525035 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #13 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-06 01:42:07 EDT --- Noriko, yep, restarting will not work in Live CD case as it will start new instance. Though as s-c-l modified /etc/sysconfig/i18n file i have tested this with live cd mentioned in Bug and things are working fine, after selecting Japanese language from s-c-l it working fine. $cat /etc/sysconfig/i18n gives me LANG="ja_JP.UTF-8" if got anything more on this please reopen this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476871] GDM uses wrong keyboard layout after switching back
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476871 --- Comment #13 from fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-05 21:10:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > You don't want to always send GDM_KEYBOARD_LAYOUT because then the users choice > from within the session (from gnome-keyboard-properties) would get ignored. Is it the implementation for gnome-settings-daemon instead of GDM? My concern is that GDM cannot get the current user's layout without gconfd but if GDM calls user's gconfd to check the user's layout, it would be possible double gconfd, one is from GDM and another is from gnome-session. If GDM always send GDM_KEYBOARD_LAYOUT, gnome-settings-daemon could implement if it uses the enviroment or get the value from gconf value. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 525035] Selected language is not implemented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525035 --- Comment #12 from Noriko Mizumoto <noriko(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-05 19:56:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Noriko, > > can you put output of > $cat /etc/sysconfig/i18n > after step 6 Sure, 6. Rebooted manually. 7. Usual login screen came up (language selection was 'English'), and clicked 'Log In'. 8. English was chosen. 9. $cat /etc/sysconfig/i18n LANG="en_US.UTF-8" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 505100] need xinput conf file for XIM to enable X locale compose maps
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505100 Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam(a)redhat.com Severity|urgent |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476871] GDM uses wrong keyboard layout after switching back
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476871 --- Comment #12 from Ray Strode <rstrode(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-05 12:44:56 EDT --- You don't want to always send GDM_KEYBOARD_LAYOUT because then the users choice from within the session (from gnome-keyboard-properties) would get ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> 2009-10-05 09:11:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Anyway, thanks a lot for adding a new font package in the review pipe > > Appart from the CSS classification I can't really help you with, here is some > review: > > 1. non LGC font ⇒ please use a priority ≥ 65 as per fontconfig-priorities.txt > I'll check up the prio for the lohit font and fix this.. > 3. Licensing should be GPLv2+ Fixed. Will upload a new build in a day max. > > 4. (non blocking) please ask upstream to add the standard FSF GPL font > exception to their licensing Contacted upstream, no response yet :( > > 5. (non blocking) description could use some meat I copied whatever I got from the font homepage. There's no readme etc to get more from. > Anyway, this package is mostly fine, except for the classification problem. > > NEEDINFO till this is resolved (In reply to comment #6) > Ankur, please use Sans as classification and I'll approve the package (if you > fixed the other bits. Also, please make sure your fontconfig prio is > Lohit > Devanagari so Lohit stays the default Okay, ill fix up the fontconfig. I cant do much about some of the other bits (stated above) regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-10-05 07:16:03 EDT --- Ankur, please use Sans as classification and I'll approve the package (if you fixed the other bits. Also, please make sure your fontconfig prio is > Lohit Devanagari so Lohit stays the default -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-10-05 07:13:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > 2. please ask the lohit people what they think about this font. IMHO it is > > highly likely one of the lohit fonts shares a common ancestry with gargi (and > > in that case they should at least cross-alias each other) > > while comparing lohit devanagari script fonts (marathi, hindi, konkani, nepali, > sindhi and kashmiri) > > There are little bit differences in lohit and Gargi > i.e Gargi fonts shape are little more Bold compare to lohit, > space of gargi is more than lohit > there are also little bit differences in characters shape Ok, that means that they probably were not forked from a common root after all, so no need to cross-alias > but overall as said above yes, they share common style(Sans) and ancestry. > > between how corss-alias will work? cross-alias is when package B tells fontconfig : if app asks for font A, and it is not present, use my font B instead (and the reverse in package A). We do it for DejaVuLGC/DejaVu for example. But this kind of aliasing is only worth it when fonts are very close in style or metrics, typically when two projects took the same origin font and froked it in different ways -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-05 06:55:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 2. please ask the lohit people what they think about this font. IMHO it is > highly likely one of the lohit fonts shares a common ancestry with gargi (and > in that case they should at least cross-alias each other) while comparing lohit devanagari script fonts (marathi, hindi, konkani, nepali, sindhi and kashmiri) There are little bit differences in lohit and Gargi i.e Gargi fonts shape are little more Bold compare to lohit, space of gargi is more than lohit there are also little bit differences in characters shape but overall as said above yes, they share common style(Sans) and ancestry. between how corss-alias will work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 504270] New: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504270 Summary: [Fonts-Indic][te_IN] - GSUB shape with SSA and HA are wrong. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: smaitra(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: smaitra(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: GSUB shape with SSA (0C37) and HA (0C39) is showing wrong in the font. Its positioning for the lower part of the composed character, should be below-right aligned which is now aligned as below-middle. As of now The Image that is given to our Internal web page, is hand drawn and partly wrong also. But, the lower part alignment is Perfect there which is showing right-aligned. These specific Combinations are given below : 68. U+0C24 U+0C4D U+0C37 త్ష TA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 70. U+0C24 U+0C4D U+0C39 త్హ TA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 103. U+0C28 U+0C4D U+0C37 న్ష NA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 105. U+0C28 U+0C4D U+0C39 న్హ NA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 140. U+0C2E U+0C4D U+0C39 మ్హ MA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 175. U+0C2F U+0C4D U+0C39 య్హ YA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 208. U+0C30 U+0C4D U+0C37 ర్ష RA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 210. U+0C30 U+0C4D U+0C39 ర్హ RA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 243. U+0C32 U+0C4D U+0C37 ల్ష LA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 245. U+0C32 U+0C4D U+0C39 ల్హ LA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 278. U+0C35 U+0C4D U+0C37 వ్ష VA + HALANT + SSA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. 280. U+0C35 U+0C4D U+0C39 వ్హ VA + HALANT + HA => In image main character must be corrected as in font and in font the position of sub character(which is at the bottom) should be corrected as in image. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-telugu-fonts-2.3.8-1.fc11 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start system with FC11 or Latest 2. Change the ibus with RAWCODE 3. Open Gedit 4. Type the combination's Unicode as given above. 5. Observe the lower part of the composed character. Actual results: Its showing below-middle alignment. Expected results: It should be below-right alignment. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #15 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-05 05:20:59 EDT --- bitmap-fonts-0.3-9.fc12 successfully moved from dist-f12-updates-candidate into dist-f12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs October 2009