i18n-bugs October 2009

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
312 discussions

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 505100] need xinput conf file for XIM to enable X locale compose maps
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Oct '09

02 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505100 --- Comment #62 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-02 02:56:07 EDT --- I was trying to remember why I didn't make such change before. The impact on this change would be one has to restart their desktop after turning off/on IM every time since we stop imsettings-applet running by default and it depends on the change of XMODIFIERS anyway. Another concern is, some applications might becomes unstable when switching IM - one might freezes, one might crash etc - particularly when XMODIFIERS isn't @im=none. I've just brought up an idea. but not sure if it's really good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 505100] need xinput conf file for XIM to enable X locale compose maps
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Oct '09

02 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505100 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|gtk2 |imsettings AssignedTo|mclasen(a)redhat.com |tagoh(a)redhat.com --- Comment #61 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-01 23:27:10 EDT --- Sounds good to me - good idea :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '09

01 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |psatpute(a)redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-10-01 18:21:57 EDT --- Anyway, thanks a lot for adding a new font package in the review pipe Appart from the CSS classification I can't really help you with, here is some review: 1. non LGC font ⇒ please use a priority ≥ 65 as per fontconfig-priorities.txt 2. please ask the lohit people what they think about this font. IMHO it is highly likely one of the lohit fonts shares a common ancestry with gargi (and in that case they should at least cross-alias each other) 3. Licensing should be GPLv2+ 4. (non blocking) please ask upstream to add the standard FSF GPL font exception to their licensing 5. (non blocking) description could use some meat Anyway, this package is mostly fine, except for the classification problem. NEEDINFO till this is resolved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '09

01 Oct '09

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 505100] need xinput conf file for XIM to enable X locale compose maps
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '09

01 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505100 --- Comment #60 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-01 09:00:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #58) > I think we should support X compose for any locale in principle > so I suggest not to make it locale specific and call the xinput.d > file say "xcompose.conf". (Is the name "X compose" broad enough > to cover it?) Or we could update none.conf to use im-xim.so but with XMODIFIERS=@im=none instead of gtk-im-context-simple. it doesn't requires the extra configurations. and it will keeps consistency among all of applications on X. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 525035] Selected language is not implemented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '09

01 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525035 --- Comment #11 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-01 06:13:44 EDT --- Noriko, can you put output of $cat /etc/sysconfig/i18n after step 6 thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '09

01 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #17 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-01 06:04:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > 3. your -fixed subpackage contains font files that declare themselves as > "Console". These should go in a "console" subpackage as it has only console fonts in it dropping this subpackage and will have bitmap-console-fonts subpackage > > 6. why do you add a Requires(pre): fontconfig ? We do not require fontconfig in > font packages. Do you have a special need? > > 7. what do you need xorg-x11-font-utils as BR for ? > > 8. I think you can specify a different LICENSE field per subpackage, can you > check with spot how he'd prefer the licensing reported ? (mixed licensing > packages are a PITA) I feel if it'd be better if each subpackage was tagged > with just the necessary license info (and included the corresponding license > files) > can you guide me little bit about what is exact LICENSES of fangsongati, just test is give but not mention which GPL version etc. > 9. fontconfig will happily use pcf.gz files, please compress your pcf files (if > you're feeling ambitious ask behdad if he intends to support pcf.xz soon) > > That's all for this first partial review, will look more in depth tomorrow ok, so fontdir will contain pcf.gz file, looks ok thanks for first review as we are targeting this for f13 we have some time now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 238896] [ml_IN] vowel is applied for Chillu consonant instead of consonant [Vowel assignment issue with pango]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '09

01 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238896 Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pnemade(a)redhat.com Version|11 |rawhide Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-01 03:53:12 EDT --- Thanks Ani for updating this bug. I will close this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 238896] [ml_IN] vowel is applied for Chillu consonant instead of consonant [Vowel assignment issue with pango]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '09

01 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238896 --- Comment #11 from Ani Peter <apeter(a)redhat.com> 2009-10-01 03:49:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=363287) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363287) Screenshot of latest testing with combinations in gedit I confirm that this bug is fixed and has been tested in the latest pango: pango-1.26.0-1.fc12.i686. Its working perfect. Screenshot for the combinations with all chillu tested in gedit is attached -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526377] Depsolving problem with latest updates (ibus and rubygem-activerecord)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '09

01 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526377 --- Comment #6 from Andre Robatino <andre(a)bwh.harvard.edu> 2009-10-01 01:51:22 EDT --- Fixed for me with latest F11 updates (I'm on x86_64, so the Platform should be "All Linux"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526359] New: Please rebuild against new ibus libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '09

01 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please rebuild against new ibus libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526359 Summary: Please rebuild against new ibus libraries Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: low Component: ibus-rawcode AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: webmaster(a)aus-city.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package ibus.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package ibus-anthy.i586 0:1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: kasumi for package: ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 ---> Package ibus-gtk.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.i586 ---> Package ibus-libs.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package ibus-pinyin.noarch 0:1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: python-enchant for package: ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.0 for package: ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.i586 ---> Package kasumi.i586 0:2.4-2.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package python-enchant.i586 0:1.3.1-4.fc11 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.i586 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0 is needed by package ibus-m17n-1.1.0.20090211-5.fc11.i586 (installed) ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0 is needed by package ibus-chewing-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 (installed) ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.i586 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0 is needed by package ibus-rawcode-1.0.0.20090303-3.fc11.i586 (installed) ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.i586 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.0 is needed by package ibus-hangul-1.1.0.20090328-2.fc11.i586 (installed) --> Running transaction check ---> Package ibus-libs.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: ibus-libs = 1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 for package: ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.1 for package: ibus-gtk-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 --> Processing Dependency: libibus.so.1 for package: ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 --> Finished Dependency Resolution ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: ibus-libs = 1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 is needed by package ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 (updates) ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.1 is needed by package ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 (updates) ibus-gtk-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libibus.so.1 is needed by package ibus-gtk-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 (updates) --> Running transaction check ---> Package ibus.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: ibus >= 1.2.0 for package: ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch --> Processing Dependency: ibus >= 1.2.0.20090904 for package: ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 ---> Package ibus-gtk.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated ---> Package ibus-libs.i586 0:1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch from updates has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: ibus >= 1.2.0 is needed by package ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch (updates) ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 from updates has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: ibus >= 1.2.0.20090904 is needed by package ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 (updates) Packages skipped because of dependency problems: ibus-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-1.fc11.i586 from updates ibus-gtk-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates ibus-libs-1.2.0.20090927-1.fc11.i586 from updates ibus-pinyin-1.2.0.20090915-1.fc11.noarch from updates kasumi-2.4-2.fc11.i586 from fedora python-enchant-1.3.1-4.fc11.i586 from fedora Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 526373] New: Please build it with ibus-1.2.0
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '09

01 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please build it with ibus-1.2.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526373 Summary: Please build it with ibus-1.2.0 Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus-sayura AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: phuang(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: I have updated ibus to 1.2.0 for f11. Please update this package too. Thanks. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs October 2009