i18n-bugs February 2015

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
348 discussions

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 841947] New: [te_IN] Add support for Telugu nakaarapollu and repha to Lohit Telugu font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Dec '17

12 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841947 Bug ID: 841947 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Summary: [te_IN] Add support for Telugu nakaarapollu and repha to Lohit Telugu font Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: lohit-telugu-fonts Product: Fedora Created attachment 599423 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=599423&action=edit Glyphs for Telugu nakaarapollu and repha Telugu script has special form of vowelless NA called four-pronged nakaarapollu. Strictly speaking nakaarapollu means nakaara + pollu=virama so regular form of vowelless-NA న్ is also nakaarapollu but Telugu old grammarian Brown has specifically called a distinct form as nakaarapollu. The recommended model for getting Telugu nakaarapollu is NA + ZWJ + VIRAMA. Please find more details in the document: https://sites.google.com/site/jamadagni/files/utcsubmissions/11409-telugu-n… Likewise Telugu script has old repha form which is not found in common usage in current Telugu script. A modern-style Telugu font can allow user to select old-style reph by using the sequence RA + VIRAMA + ZWJ + CONSONANT because the plain RA + VIRAMA + CONSONANT would be presented as RA with sub-base form of CONSONANT. Please find more details in the document: https://sites.google.com/site/jamadagni/files/utcsubmissions/12017-telugu-r… These two documents have been approved by the UTC in the Feb 2012 meeting: http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2012/12007.htm <quote> [130-A15] Action Item for Deborah Anderson, Editorial Committee: Update the core specification text on Telugu nakaara-pollu based on input in document L2/11-409. [130-A16] Action Item for Deborah Anderson: Incorporate text on Telugu Reph from L2/12-017 into the Telugu block description. </quote> It is requested to: 1) add the glyphs for nakaarapollu and repha to the Lohit Telugu font: 2) add substitution mapping of NA + ZWJ + VIRAMA to the nakaarapollu glyph 3) add requisite OT markups for repha glyph so that a compliant OT system can recognize the repha glyph and render sequence of RA + VIRAMA + ZWJ + CONS using that glyph. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 10

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 982601] New: [ml_IN] Addition of glyphs to Lohit Malayalam to support recently proposed Unicode characters
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Dec '17

12 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982601 Bug ID: 982601 Summary: [ml_IN] Addition of glyphs to Lohit Malayalam to support recently proposed Unicode characters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Created attachment 770964 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=770964&action=edit Glyphs for Malayalam Archaic II, minor fractions and Chillu LLL Recently I and Cibu Johny have proposed various characters to be added to the Malayalam Unicode block and in the last May 2013 UTC meeting they have been approved and further (IIUC) approved by the WG2 meeting last month in Lithunia. The links are provided below: N4429 Proposal to encode Malayalam minor fractions http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n4429.pdf N4428 Proposal to encode MALAYALAM LETTER CHILLU LLL http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n4428.pdf N4312 Proposal for MALAYALAM LETTER ARCHAIC II http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n4312.pdf This is a placeholder bug (like bug #839303 for Tamil fractions and symbols) to ensure that the requisite glyphs are added immediately once the characters are published in the Unicode standard finally. I have designed the glyphs for these proposed characters partially based on existing glyphs from the Lohit Malayalam font and would like to submit these as my contributions to the Lohit project under the OFL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MHHAN30OzJ&a=cc_unsubscribe

2 19

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1076190] New: Rendering of Unicode tie bars could be improved
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Dec '17

12 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076190 Bug ID: 1076190 Summary: Rendering of Unicode tie bars could be improved Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: liberation-fonts Severity: low Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: rkaldari(a)wikimedia.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Created attachment 874108 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=874108&action=edit comparison between Liberation Sans and Helvetica Description of problem: The rendering of the two Unicode tie bar combining characters (U+035E and U+035F) is not ideal. In particular the characters are quite short and far away from the characters they are tying together. This makes it appear more like a misplaced macron than a tie bar. The rendering in Liberation Sans appears to be equivalent to that of Arial which has the same issues. The rendering in Helvetica is better (see attachment 1). In particular, because the under tie bar (U+035F) is so far away from the other characters, it sometimes gets clipped when rendered, as it appears to fall slightly outside of the bounding box for the line height (see attachment 2). My suggestion would be to make the length of both tie bars slightly longer, and to move both of them slightly closer to the characters they are intended to tie together. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 12-Mar-2014 (2.x) How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install latest Liberation Sans (and Helvetica if you want to compare) 2. Go to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Kaldari/Font_test_2 Actual results: Tie bars should be slightly longer and closer to the other characters. Expected results: Tie bar are quite short and far away. Additional info: See attachments for more info. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hXKa1OSOTy&a=cc_unsubscribe

2 16

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1084227] New: Arrow symbols too small and not nicely aligned
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Dec '17

12 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084227 Bug ID: 1084227 Summary: Arrow symbols too small and not nicely aligned Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: liberation-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: Eduard.Braun2(a)gmx.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Created attachment 882471 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=882471&action=edit testcase with some exemplary arrows The arrow symbols contained in Liberation fonts seem to be too small and also a little mis-aligned. As an example consider the attached testcase which contains left/right/up/down arrows exemplarily. The attached screenshot is a rendering of this file to illustrate the issue: - The arrows are much to small making them hardly discernible, especially at small font sizes. - The horizontally aligned arrows are positioned too low (nearly at the baseline). - Also visible: Hinting for the vertically aligned arrows is bad. The screenshot was created with Firefox 28.0 on Windows 7. The installed version of the Liberation fonts is 2.00.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=odcuTBmRHM&a=cc_unsubscribe

2 12

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1160916] New: fbterm-1.7-5.fc21.ppc64le.rpm segfaults on VGA output (tty1)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Sep '17

02 Sep '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160916 Bug ID: 1160916 Summary: fbterm-1.7-5.fc21.ppc64le.rpm segfaults on VGA output (tty1) Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: fbterm Severity: medium Assignee: bazanluis20(a)gmail.com Reporter: bugproxy(a)us.ibm.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: bazanluis20(a)gmail.com, dchen(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jkachuck(a)redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=V8kx20urkS&a=cc_unsubscribe

2 11

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1182819] New: RFE: Support KB_THL_PINYIN and KB_MPS2_PINYIN
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '17

20 Aug '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182819 Bug ID: 1182819 Summary: RFE: Support KB_THL_PINYIN and KB_MPS2_PINYIN Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: ibus-chewing Severity: low Assignee: dchen(a)redhat.com Reporter: dchen(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dchen(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com Description of problem: KB_THL_PINYIN = 台灣華語羅馬拼音 KB_MPS2_PINYIN = 注音二式 These two keyboard layout are added in libchewing 0.3.4. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tcnj9U1NBF&a=cc_unsubscribe

2 12

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 851950] New: Latin ligatures need 'liga' standard ligature lookups
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jun '17

23 Jun '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851950 Bug ID: 851950 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: low Version: 17 Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Summary: Latin ligatures need 'liga' standard ligature lookups Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: All Reporter: deron.meranda(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: liberation-fonts Product: Fedora Description of problem: Glyphs in the Latin Ligature block (U+FB00 .. U+FB06), such as "fi" and "fl", should have the OpenType 'liga' lookup features defined. That will allow text renderers to automatically apply the ligature glyph. Additionally, for completeness, the ligature caret horizontal positions should be appropriately set for these glyphs. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-fonts-2.00.0 Additional info: You may need to solve bug #851790 first. Also the "fi" (and "ffi" if existing) should exclude dotless-i scripts/languages, e.g., Turkish. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1130071] New: translate-toolkit-1.12.0 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jun '17

23 Jun '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130071 Bug ID: 1130071 Summary: translate-toolkit-1.12.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: translate-toolkit Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: dwayne(a)translate.org.za Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dwayne(a)translate.org.za, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i(a)cicku.me Latest upstream release: 1.12.0 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 1.9.0-5.fc20 URL: http://sourceforge.net/api/file/index/project-name/translate/mtime/desc/lim… Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tFdoNjVvwO&a=cc_unsubscribe

2 48

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1136245] New: libunistring-0.9.4 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Feb '17

20 Feb '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136245 Bug ID: 1136245 Summary: libunistring-0.9.4 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: libunistring Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: p(a)draigbrady.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jim(a)meyering.net, p(a)draigbrady.com Latest upstream release: 0.9.4 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 0.9.3-11.fc22 URL: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libunistring/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Soon this service will be implemented by a new system: https://github.com/fedora-infra/anitya/ It will require to manage monitored projects via a new web interface. Please make yourself familiar with the new system to ease the transition. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hmvR3JS1Pj&a=cc_unsubscribe

2 14

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1161284] New: git dependency
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jan '17

26 Jan '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161284 Bug ID: 1161284 Summary: git dependency Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: gettext Severity: low Assignee: dueno(a)redhat.com Reporter: tessarek(a)evermeet.cx QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dueno(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, praiskup(a)redhat.com Description of problem: gettext-devel depends on git Additional info: Mail correspondence with Daiki Ueno: > Can you please remove the git dependency for gettext-devel? > > This is supposed to be a development package (mainly include files). > Since git on Fedora is very old and not updated reagularily, I tried to > remove git (to compile my own git) and to my surprise I saw that > gettext-devel depends on git. > > AFAIK this is the only *-devel package which depends on git. Actually, it _was_ needed for autopoint (a developer script, like autoconf or automake), when we used git as a compression method of /usr/share/gettext/archive.dir.*. Now that the default changed to tar.xz, git shouldn't be necessary anymore. > I truly believe this is a bug. Can you please fix this? Could you please file a bug on bugzilla.redhat.com, so we don't forgot to fix it on the next update? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UK9aT8RR8W&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 10

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
35
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs February 2015