https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2296122
Bug ID: 2296122
Summary: harfbuzz-devel installs broken cmake config file
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: harfbuzz
Severity: medium
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: fella(a)posteo.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, klember(a)redhat.com,
moceap(a)hotmail.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
/usr/lib64/cmake/harfbuzz/harfbuzz-config.cmake contains unresolved cmake
templates, e.g., the file starts with
@PACKAGE_INIT@
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install harfbuzz-devel
2. cat /usr/lib64/cmake/harfbuzz/harfbuzz-config.cmake
3.
Actual Results:
File contains unresolved templates
Expected Results:
File does not contain unresolved templates
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2296122
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321990
Bug ID: 2321990
Summary: The spec file lacks some xinit conditional judgments
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: ibus
Severity: medium
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: fxzxmicah(a)outlook.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I believe the %post section should be written as follows:
%if %{with xinit}
%post
%else
%post xinit
%endif
%{_sbindir}/alternatives --install %{_sysconfdir}/X11/xinit/xinputrc xinputrc
%{_xinputconf} 83 || :
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
none
Actual Results:
none
Expected Results:
none
none
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321990
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310426
--- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
Hi Mathieu, thanks and I am so sorry to hear what you have gone through.
I can't imagine how it must have been, but your courage is great!
I still think it would make sense to do a more formal Change process,
if you really want to change the default in Fedora now.
For Taiwan we had a Discourse discussion and then a F41 Change to switch to
ibus-chewing.
It would be good still to have more clarity on the pros and cons of
ibus-table Cangjie vs ibus-cangjie too.
Koala, have you tested it?
We also have https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/196 to discuss it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310426
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310426
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED
Fixed In Version| |langpacks-4.2-2.fc42
Last Closed| |2024-11-14 14:47:27
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2024-c5ece8013b (langpacks-4.2-2.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42
stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310426
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310426
--- Comment #22 from Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Mathieu Bridon from comment #21)
> (In reply to Mike FABIAN from comment #20)
> > (In reply to Koala Yeung from comment #18)
> >
> > > I would not want to take away previous efforts to add features to the
> > > system. It is handy for a small subset of HK people who is proficient in
> > > both Cangjie and pinyin, but I'd say this is not the input experience that
> > > I, or fellow HK Cangjie users, would prefer.
> > >
> > > In the spirit of open source system, if we have contributors on an active
> > > project for a dedicated solution, I find it difficult to understand why we
> > > should sacrifice a more tailor-made out-of-box solution and have a
> > > compromises for a generalized system with tradeoffs configs to support other
> > > unrelated input methods.
> >
> > Maybe there is a misunderstanding here. I am not against installing
> > ibus-cangjie by default for zh_HK. And I am not against making it the
> > default either.
>
> Not sure whether we actually want it to be the default, maybe? 🤷
We would also need to change the default upstream in Gnome back then:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-desktop/-/blob/master/libgnome-desktop…
> Koala, what do you think? 🤔
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310426
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…