https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088734
--- Comment #8 from Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 39 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 39 on
2024-11-26.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with
a
'version' of '39'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version'
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 39 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088734
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833858
--- Comment #35 from Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 39 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 39 on
2024-11-26.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with
a
'version' of '39'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version'
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 39 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833858
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690275
--- Comment #14 from Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 39 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 39 on
2024-11-26.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with
a
'version' of '39'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version'
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 39 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690275
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658174
--- Comment #6 from Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 39 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 39 on
2024-11-26.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with
a
'version' of '39'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version'
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 39 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658174
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309478
Bug ID: 2309478
Summary: Please branch and build ibus-chewing 1.6.1 for EL8 and
EL9
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: ibus-chewing
Keywords: Desktop
Severity: medium
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: darkranger_red(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dchen(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
kanru(a)kanru.info, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Starting from RHEL 8 for the Traditional Chinese locale, ibus-chewing has been
replaced by ibus-libzhuyin. But ibus-chewing remains available on every Fedora
releases. Its main dependency - libchewing is also already available via EPEL 8
and 9.
I use both the Fedora Linux and RHEL in my work environment. On my Fedora box,
I always prefer ibus-chewing rather than the default ibus-libzhuyin. I did
tried to use ibus-libzhuyin on the RHEL machines, but the overall experience is
much more problematic.
At first, I thought there might be some serious compatibility issues to build
ibus-chewing on RHEL 8 and 9. But turns out it is actually not the case (at
least for v1.6.1, not the newer releases). Just with a very little revision,
the source rpm of ibus-chewing from Fedora 40 can be built successfully and
workable on EL 8 and 9. The reproducible procedure will be like:
1.
sudo dnf group install "Development Tools"
sudo dnf install cmake ibus-devel libchewing-devel glib2-devel gtk2-devel
libX11-devel
2.
wget
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/40/Everything/…
rpm -ivh ibus-chewing-1.6.1-25.fc40.src.rpm
3.
Modify rpmbuild/SPECS/ibus-chewing.spec, comment out the following line:
BuildRequires: gettext-runtime
4.
rpmbuild -ba rpmbuild/SPECS/ibus-chewing.spec
-Done.
Please help to branch and build ibus-chewing 1.6.1 for EL8 and EL9. Thank you.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309478
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2322880
--- Comment #5 from Masatake YAMATO <yamato(a)redhat.com> ---
I applied the following change (derrived from
https://github.com/ueno/libskk/pull/90/files)
[yamato@dev64]% sudo dnf4 diff
/usr/share/libskk/rules/default/rom-kana/default.json
Updating Subscription Management repositories.
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:37 ago on Fri 08 Nov 2024 02:41:31 AM JST.
--- /usr/share/libskk/rules/default/rom-kana/default.json 2018-06-26
13:11:00.000000000 +0900
+++ /usr/share/libskk/rules/default/rom-kana/default.json 2024-11-08
02:17:04.060088360 +0900
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
"myi": ["", "みぃ" ],
"myo": ["", "みょ" ],
"myu": ["", "みゅ" ],
- "n\'": ["", "ん" ],
+ "n'": ["", "ん" ],
"na": ["", "な" ],
"ne": ["", "ね" ],
"ni": ["", "に" ],
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2322880
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2324342
--- Comment #3 from Mike FABIAN <mfabian(a)redhat.com> ---
To be able to test this at all I had to use lightdm instead of gdm because of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237652
So I did:
mfabian@f41:~$ sudo dnf install lightdm lightdm-gtk
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
Package "lightdm-1.32.0-11.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
Package "lightdm-gtk-2.0.8-10.fc41.x86_64" is already installed.
Nothing to do.
mfabian@f41:~$ sudo systemctl disable gdm --now
Removed '/etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service'.
mfabian@f41:~$ sudo systemctl enable lightdm --now
and then did the above tests.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2324342
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…