https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217542
Bug ID: 2217542
Summary: cppcheck-2.11-1.fc39 fails on gettext.h with
returnDanglingLifetime
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
URL: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/actions/runs/5
378586167/jobs/9758588667#step:4:2099
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: gettext
Severity: medium
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jkonecny(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dueno(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nphilipp(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com,
suanand(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
On Rawhide cppcheck was recently updated and now we are getting
returnDanglingLifetime error from it on copied gettext.h file from
/usr/share/gettext/gettext.h path.
Version of cppcheck which shows this issue: 2.11-1.fc39
Last version of cppcheck which worked well: 2.9-4.fc38
I don't know if the error is valid or not...
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. podman run --rm -it fedora:rawhide
2. dnf install -y cppcheck gettext-devel
3. cppcheck -q -v /usr/share/gettext/gettext.h
Actual Results:
/usr/share/gettext/gettext.h:248:16: error: Returning pointer to local variable
'msg_ctxt_id' that will be invalid when returning. [returnDanglingLifetime]
return translation;
Expected Results:
No error
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217542
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999864
Bug ID: 1999864
Summary: Cannot find package with font for Coptic although such
a package exists for Fedora 34
Product: Fedora
Version: 34
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mfabian(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1819530
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1819530&action=edit
Gnome Software unable to find Coptic fonts
Using Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-34-1.2.iso in qemu.
I played with emoji picker and Gnome popped up something requesting more fonts.
I clicked and then Gnome Software said:
“Unable to find the Coptic, Persian, Old (ca. 600-400 B.C.), Ugaritic you were
searching for. Please see _the documentation_ for more information.”
See attached screenshot.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290912
Bug ID: 2290912
Summary: CVE-2024-29041 cldr-emoji-annotation: express: cause
malformed URLs to be evaluated [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Status: NEW
Component: cldr-emoji-annotation
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: high
Priority: high
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rkeshri(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290901
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on
a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw
indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290912
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251384
Bug ID: 2251384
Summary: Wrong Arabic font prioritization in several apps.
(Droid kufi prioritized over noto-sans)
Product: Fedora
Version: 39
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Severity: low
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: alawamiaz(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Few fedora releases ago, Noto-Sans-Arabic was set to be the default. It was
working fine and Arabic text was displayed in all web browsers using this font.
sometime in last few months, every web browser in fedora suddenly started
prioritizing "Druid Kufi" font over noto-sans-arabic. which now looks makes
arabic text looks jarring.
Interestingly, when running from live usb image, noto-sans-arabic is correctly
priotirized and being used to render all arabic web pages, but only for FEW
MINUTES and then suddenly it's switched to druid kufi!, without updating
anything, just running Firefox for few minutes.
It's also reproducible after fresh install, the first 3 minutes of using the
new fedora installation, Firefox and other browsers are displaying noto-sans
then suddenly switch to druid kufi.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
38-39
How reproducible:
Consistently
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Connect to internet
2.Open arabic webpage in firefox (ex, wikipedia)
3.text would be displayed with druid kufi instead of the default
noto-sans-arabic which was chosen to be the default sometime around fedora 36.
Actual results:
Arabic Text displayed with druid kufi font
Expected results:
Arabic text should be displayed using noto-sans-arabic as was the case before.
Additional info:
The font in gnome and top bars is still correctly displayed using
noto-sans-arabic. It's browsers that exhibit the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251384
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293624
Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(kanru(a)kanru.info)
--- Comment #4 from Aoife Moloney <amoloney(a)redhat.com> ---
Hi @kan-ru, I see your PR has been merged. Can this change be marked as ON_QA
now, or is there another step to do before we can call this change complete in
time for the beta freeze deadline of 27th August? Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293624
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…