i18n-bugs September 2024

i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
69 discussions

[Bug 1409403] Does not recognize 'ber' locale
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Sep '24

30 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409403 Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|39 |41 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409403

1 0

[Bug 2315321] Missing man page for FcPatternFormat
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Sep '24

27 Sep '24

1 0

[Bug 2315078] New: kasumi-2.6 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 Sep '24

27 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315078 Bug ID: 2315078 Summary: kasumi-2.6 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: kasumi Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.0, 0.5, 0.6, 0.10, 1.0, 2.0, 2.6 Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.6 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.5-47.fc42 URL: https://osdn.net/projects/kasumi/releases/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1490/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kasumi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315078 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 2

[Bug 2312891] New: liberation-fonts doesn't gets auto-replaced with liberation-fonts-all on F40 -> F41 upgrade
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 Sep '24

25 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2312891 Bug ID: 2312891 Summary: liberation-fonts doesn't gets auto-replaced with liberation-fonts-all on F40 -> F41 upgrade Product: Fedora Version: 41 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: liberation-fonts Severity: medium Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: mateusrodcosta(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mark(a)net-c.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, vishalvijayraghavan(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora When upgrading from Fedora Silverbue 40 to Fedora Silverblue 41, liberation-fonts wasn't properly replaced with liberation-fonts-all, causing dependency issues I managed to fix it manually but ideally it should have been replaced automatically. The dependency error message (which I didn't copy as I had borken terminal due to a separate GTK issue) basically seemed to be from liberation-fonts rewuiring specific versions of the sans, serif and mono fonts, preventing their upgrades. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Upgrade from F40 to F41 Beta with liberation-fonts installed 2. Check for dependency slving issues 3. Actual Results: Dependency issues on Fedorea Silveblue 41 Expected Results: No issues Interestingly the problem only appeared on my first transaction after the F41 rebase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2312891 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 7

[Bug 2314457] New: harfbuzz-10.0.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 Sep '24

25 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314457 Bug ID: 2314457 Summary: harfbuzz-10.0.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: harfbuzz Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, klember(a)redhat.com, moceap(a)hotmail.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 10.0.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 10.0.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 9.0.0-3.fc42 URL: https://harfbuzz.github.io Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1299/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/harfbuzz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314457 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 7

[Bug 2314470] New: Please branch and build python-polib in epel10
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 Sep '24

25 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314470 Bug ID: 2314470 Summary: Please branch and build python-polib in epel10 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel10 Status: NEW Component: python-polib Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: michel(a)michel-slm.name QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dchen(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, reallylongword(a)gmail.com, sundeep_anand(a)yahoo.com Blocks: 1914423 (EPELPackagersSIG), 2314465 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Please branch and build python-polib in epel10. If you do not wish to maintain python-polib in epel10, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-polib/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: salimma); please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-polib/adduser Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914423 [Bug 1914423] Tracker for epel-packagers-sig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314465 [Bug 2314465] Please branch and build linkchecker in epel10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314470 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 2

[Bug 2314038] New: F40 to F41 system-upgrade fails due to google-noto-fonts conflicts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 Sep '24

25 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314038 Bug ID: 2314038 Summary: F40 to F41 system-upgrade fails due to google-noto-fonts conflicts Product: Fedora Version: 40 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: google-noto-fonts Keywords: Upgrades Severity: medium Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: sebastian.spree(a)web.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora I am on Fedora 40. It's a Cinnamon installation, but I have also Budgie, GNOME and Cosmic (COPR) installed. I am running mainly GNOME. Upgrading to Fedora 41 beta fails due to: Running transaction check Error: transaction check vs depsolve: google-noto-sans-meeteimayek-vf-fonts < 20240701-2.fc41 is obsoleted by google-noto-sans-meetei-mayek-vf-fonts-20240701-2.fc41.noarch google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts < 20240701-2.fc41 is obsoleted by google-noto-sans-symbols-2-fonts-20240701-2.fc41.noarch openjpeg2 < 2.5.2-2 is obsoleted by openjpeg-2.5.2-3.fc41.x86_64 google-noto-fonts-common = 20240301-2.fc40 is needed by (installed) google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch google-noto-fonts-common = 20240301-2.fc40 is needed by (installed) google-noto-sans-meeteimayek-vf-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch google-noto-fonts-common = 20240301-2.fc40 is needed by (installed) google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch google-noto-fonts-common = 20240301-2.fc40 is needed by (installed) google-noto-sans-meeteimayek-vf-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch To diagnose the problem, try running: 'rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest'. You probably have corrupted RPMDB, running 'rpm --rebuilddb' might fix the issue. The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages' Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.run sudo dnf upgrade --refresh 2.reboot 3.run sudo dnf system-upgrade --best download --releasever=41 Actual Results: upgrade fails due to dependency conflicts Expected Results: upgrade should succeed Trying to resolve this by removing google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch google-noto-sans-meeteimayek-vf-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch google-noto-sans-symbols2-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch google-noto-sans-meeteimayek-vf-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch fails with Running transaction check Error: transaction check vs depsolve: rit-meera-new-fonts is needed by (installed) default-fonts-ml-4.0-13.fc40.noarch To diagnose the problem, try running: 'rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest'. You probably have corrupted RPMDB, running 'rpm --rebuilddb' might fix the issue. Running rpm --rebuilddb does not fix the situation. For output of rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest see attachement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314038 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2307987] New: unicode-ucd-16.0.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 23 Sep '24

23 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307987 Bug ID: 2307987 Summary: unicode-ucd-16.0.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: unicode-ucd Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mfabian(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 16.0.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 16.0.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 15.1.0-4.fc41 URL: http://www.unicode.org/Public/zipped/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5045/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/unicode-ucd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307987 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2217542] New: cppcheck-2.11-1.fc39 fails on gettext.h with returnDanglingLifetime
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 Sep '24

20 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217542 Bug ID: 2217542 Summary: cppcheck-2.11-1.fc39 fails on gettext.h with returnDanglingLifetime Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: x86_64 URL: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/actions/runs/5 378586167/jobs/9758588667#step:4:2099 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: gettext Severity: medium Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: jkonecny(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dueno(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nphilipp(a)redhat.com, petersen(a)redhat.com, suanand(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora On Rawhide cppcheck was recently updated and now we are getting returnDanglingLifetime error from it on copied gettext.h file from /usr/share/gettext/gettext.h path. Version of cppcheck which shows this issue: 2.11-1.fc39 Last version of cppcheck which worked well: 2.9-4.fc38 I don't know if the error is valid or not... Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. podman run --rm -it fedora:rawhide 2. dnf install -y cppcheck gettext-devel 3. cppcheck -q -v /usr/share/gettext/gettext.h Actual Results: /usr/share/gettext/gettext.h:248:16: error: Returning pointer to local variable 'msg_ctxt_id' that will be invalid when returning. [returnDanglingLifetime] return translation; Expected Results: No error -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217542 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 10

[Bug 1076945] Arabic Lam-Alef
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 Sep '24

20 Sep '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076945 rashed <rashedkhalaf1(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(moceap(a)hotmail.co | |m) CC| |rashedkhalaf1(a)hotmail.com --- Comment #56 from rashed <rashedkhalaf1(a)hotmail.com> --- Are you looking for a water leak detection company in Riyadh? Al-Omran Company offers you the best engineers and technicians to address problems in water and installations, and the manufacturer has the best modern tools. Not only that, if you have a connection to the sewers, all you have to do is communicate with Al-Omran Company. We have the best technicians to treat the sewer disk. The septic tanks decided to clean and clear them. The drains also have them, and not only that. Do you want a company to insulate tanks or roofs? Al-Omran Company also provides you with the service of insulating tanks and insulating roofs. Insulation, thermal insulation, and sound insulation. We also offer all types of insulation at the best and cheapest prices. All you have to do is contact Al-Omran Company on the number 0575432160 if you want. To learn more, all you have to do is read the following articles <a href="https://aljoodservices.com/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d8%b5%d9%8a%d8%a…">صيانة المباني </a> <a href="https://aljoodservices.com/%d8%b5%d9%8a%d8%a7%d9%86%d8%a9-%d9%85%d8%a8%d8%a…">صيانة مباني </a> <a href="https://aljoodservices.com/%d8%b5%d9%8a%d8%a7%d9%86%d8%a9-%d8%b9%d8%a7%d9%8…">صيانة عامة </a> <a href="https://aljoodservices.com/%d8%b5%d9%8a%d8%a7%d9%86%d8%a9-%d8%b9%d8%a7%d9%8…">صيانة عامة </a> <a href="https://aljoodservices.com/%d8%b5%d9%8a%d8%a7%d9%86%d8%a9-%d8%b9%d8%a7%d9%8…">صيانة مباني </a> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076945 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs September 2024