https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2402600
Bug ID: 2402600
Summary: google-roboto-fonts-3.013 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: google-roboto-fonts
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: dtardon(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: davide(a)cavalca.name, dtardon(a)redhat.com,
epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 3.000, 3.001, 3.002, 3.003, 3.004, 3.005, 3.006, 3.007,
3.008, 3.009, 3.010, 3.011, 3.012, 3.013
Upstream release that is considered latest: 3.013
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.138-20.fc43
URL: https://github.com/googlefonts/roboto-3-classic
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M…
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/12041/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/google-roboto-fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2402600
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2425585
Bug ID: 2425585
Summary: IBus not initialized correctly in LXQt
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: ibus
Severity: medium
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: me(a)basilcrow.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
When I start LXQt (including the Fedora LXQt Spin Live ISO), I get the
following notification:
> IBus should be called from the desktop session in Wayland. For KDE, you can launch ‘systemsettings5’ utility and go to “Input Devices” → “Virtual Keyboard” section and select “IBus Wayland” icon and click “Apply” button to configure IBus in Wayland. For other desktop sessions, you can copy the ‘Exec=’ line in org.freedesktop.IBus.Panel.Wayland.Gtk3.desktop file to a configuration file of the session. Please refer each document about the “Wayland input method” configuration. Before you configure the “Wayland input method”, you should make sure that QT_IM_MODULE and GTK_IM_MODULE environment variables are unset in the desktop session.
I followed this advice and added a ~/.config/autostart/ibus-wayland.desktop
file calling
Exec=/usr/libexec/ibus-ui-gtk3 --enable-wayland-im --exec-daemon --daemon-args
"--xim --panel disable"
just as in org.freedesktop.IBus.Panel.Wayland.Gtk3.desktop. But that didn't
stop the notice from appearing. The only thing that made the notice disappear
was removing the imsettings and im-chooser packages. This seems like a bug.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start LXQt from the Live ISO (or the result of installing it).
2. Log in.
Actual Results:
You see the annoying message printed above.
Expected Results:
No annoying message should be printed. IBus should be initialized correctly by
default.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2425585
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2420382
Bug ID: 2420382
Summary: Request package ibus-rime build for rhel10
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel10
Status: NEW
Component: ibus-rime
Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com
Reporter: perm-pardon-why(a)duck.com
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello, I've recently started using RHEL 10 as my desktop system, but I've
noticed that it doesn't include ibus-rime.
I tried building this package independently in copr, but it failed. I'm hoping
you can provide this package in EPEL.
ibus-rime in Fedora is excellent. I eagerly hope to see it in RHEL as well.
- https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/dragonbillow/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2420382
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2336519
Bug ID: 2336519
Summary: When ibus-hangul is in hangul mode, switching to a
different ibus input method leaves the property panel
showing ibus-hangul
Product: Fedora
Version: 41
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: ibus-hangul
Severity: medium
Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mfabian(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pwu(a)redhat.com,
tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
mfabian@f41:~$ cat /etc/os-release
NAME="Fedora Linux"
VERSION="41 (Workstation Edition)"
RELEASE_TYPE=stable
ID=fedora
VERSION_ID=41
VERSION_CODENAME=""
PLATFORM_ID="platform:f41"
PRETTY_NAME="Fedora Linux 41 (Workstation Edition)"
ANSI_COLOR="0;38;2;60;110;180"
LOGO=fedora-logo-icon
CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:41"
DEFAULT_HOSTNAME="fedora"
HOME_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/"
DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f41/system-administrators-guide/"
SUPPORT_URL="https://ask.fedoraproject.org/"
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/"
REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora"
REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT_VERSION=41
REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora"
REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION=41
SUPPORT_END=2025-12-15
VARIANT="Workstation Edition"
VARIANT_ID=workstation
mfabian@f41:~$ rpm -q ibus
ibus-1.5.31-1.fc41.x86_64
mfabian@f41:~$ rpm -q ibus-hangul
ibus-hangul-1.5.5-6.fc41.x86_64
mfabian@f41:~$
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
- Use XFCE desktop
- Enable the property panel in ibus-setup: “Show property panel: [ Always ]”
- ibus restart
- select ibus-hangul
property panel now shows ibus-hangul, English mode
- switch to ibus-anthy
property panel now shows ibus-anthy
- switch back to ibus-hangul
- switch to hangul mode
- switch to ibus-anthy
property panel still shows ibus-hangul! <- here is the problem!
- type a into terminal, result is あ. That shows that ibus-anthy is
active but the property panel does not show that.
-
I will attach a video.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2336519
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2419469
Bug ID: 2419469
Summary: [abrt] ibus:
g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a():
ibus-extension-gtk3 killed by SIGSEGV
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
Status: NEW
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:62ba5c30e260233bacad3aa6371643c18d581460;VAR
IANT_ID=workstation;
Component: ibus
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: nielsenb(a)jetfuse.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
1 - Install Fedora Workstation Live
2 - Complete gnome-initial-setup (us-keyboard layout, US - Chicago TZ)
Error occurs when session switches to newly created user.
Version-Release number of selected component:
ibus-1.5.34~alpha1-2.fc44
Additional info:
reporter: libreport-2.17.15
type: CCpp
reason: ibus-extension-gtk3 killed by SIGSEGV
journald_cursor:
s=ffe23fd631844338a626f64d45079161;i=a55;b=f56e4fbe48744dee9cafb8372854cd9f;m=667d144;t=645377226a1e9;x=b2139625369d929b
executable: /usr/libexec/ibus-extension-gtk3
cmdline: /usr/libexec/ibus-extension-gtk3
cgroup:
0::/user.slice/user-1000.slice/user@1000.service/session.slice/org.gnome.Shell@wayland.service
rootdir: /
uid: 1000
kernel: 6.18.0-65.fc44.x86_64
package: ibus-1.5.34~alpha1-2.fc44
runlevel: /bin/sh: line 1: runlevel: command not found
backtrace_rating: 4
crash_function: g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a
Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (22 frames)
#0 g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a at ../gobject/gtype.c:3915
#2 panel_binding_construct at /usr/src/debug/ibus-1.5.34
#3 panel_binding_new at /usr/src/debug/ibus-1.5.34
#4 extension_gtk_bus_name_acquired_cb at /usr/src/debug/ibus-1.5.34
#5 _extension_gtk_bus_name_acquired_cb_gd_bus_signal_callback at
/usr/src/debug/ibus-1.5.34
#6 emit_signal_instance_in_idle_cb at ../gio/gdbusconnection.c:4207
#9 g_main_context_dispatch_unlocked at ../glib/gmain.c:4425
#10 g_main_context_iterate_unlocked at ../glib/gmain.c:4490
#12 gtk_main at ../gtk/gtkmain.c:1332
#13 _g_closure_invoke_va at ../gobject/gclosure.c:980
#14 signal_emit_valist_unlocked at ../gobject/gsignal.c:3439
#16 g_application_impl_method_call at ../gio/gapplicationimpl-dbus.c:200
#17 call_in_idle_cb at ../gio/gdbusconnection.c:5476
#20 g_main_context_dispatch_unlocked at ../glib/gmain.c:4425
#21 g_main_context_iterate_unlocked at ../glib/gmain.c:4490
#23 gtk_main at ../gtk/gtkmain.c:1332
#24 _g_closure_invoke_va at ../gobject/gclosure.c:980
#25 signal_emit_valist_unlocked at ../gobject/gsignal.c:3439
#28 g_application_activate at ../gio/gapplication.c:2471
#30 g_application_real_local_command_line at ../gio/gapplication.c:1201
#31 g_application_run at ../gio/gapplication.c:2710
#32 extension_gtk_main at /usr/src/debug/ibus-1.5.34
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2419469
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368622
Bug ID: 2368622
Summary: ibus-daemon uses insane amounts of CPU and causes a
laggy experience
Product: Fedora
Version: 42
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: ibus
Keywords: Desktop
Severity: high
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Not a lot of details here, but I decided that instead of just fixing it with
killall ibus-daemon
which gets rid of that broken thing, I would at least open a bug report to see
if there is some official fix for this.
Google shows a lot of people complaining about this going back years, so it's
not me.
There's no crash, and no obvious system logs either. All I see in system logs
is gdm-wayland-session activating, and when I kill it systemd seems to log
consumtion information like
org.freedesktop.IBus.session.GNOME.service: Consumed 26min 22.196s CPU
time, 125.1M memory peak.
(That was after the system had been up for one day, so 26 min of CPU time seems
pretty excessive)
Reproducible: Sometimes
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot the system
2. Be happy
3. Some time randomly later, notice laggy behavior and ibus-daemon using 100%
CPU in top
Actual Results:
Slow keyboard response on a fast system
Expected Results:
Snappy action
Additional Information:
Sorry for the horrible bug report, but can we please just disable ibus-daemon
by default as a useless problem-causing thing?
When google shows this problem going back AT LEAST to 2020 (and probably
longer), with the solution invariably being "kill, restart or disable
ibus-daemon to fix the problem temporarily", why is that thing enabled by
default in the first place?
Please at least give a good setting for this, so that the answer can be for
people to not enable that thing.
And if somebody has "please debug this next time it happens by doing Xyz", I'll
happily do that. But you need to tell me what Xyz is, because I don't know the
first thing about ibus-daemon.
I know that the "i" is supposed to stand for "intelligent". But honestly, I can
come up with a lot better suggestions for what that "i" might stand for. And
absolutely *none* of them are polite.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2368622
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2424256
Bug ID: 2424256
Summary: Do we really need desktop-file-utils?
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: ibus
Keywords: RFE
Severity: low
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: fxzxmicah(a)outlook.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Requires: desktop-file-utils
Requires(post): desktop-file-utils
Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils
It seems this is only a build-time dependency rather than a runtime dependency,
isn't it?
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2424256
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…