infrastructure October 2016

infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

58 participants
62 discussions

Why is RedHat using Piwik to track contributors?
by Jean-Baptiste 12 Oct '16

12 Oct '16

Hi there, I notice this piwik instance is used on Zanata : https://engstats.redhat.com/piwik/piwik.js I do not understand the aim of this, if gather a few user statistics on public website is fine to me (we need to mesure the impact of widespread communication), I am not confortable by using it on contributor tools. Redhat already have a lot of tracking of public activity of what we do (it's open and we use the same login everywhere), why would you like to go deeper in who we are ? Is it an exception to be fixed or something you do on other contributors tools ? Thanks for your help,

7 13

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Bodhi stakeholder's meeting
by Randy Barlow 11 Oct '16

11 Oct '16

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Bodhi stakeholder's meeting on 2016-10-11 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/4671/

1 0

Freeze break request: setup fedora media writer on proxies
by Kevin Fenzi 10 Oct '16

10 Oct '16

Greetings. For Beta tomorrow, the websites are going to advertize the windows and osx versions of the new Fedora Media Writer. We want to just have these on all of the proxies locally for easy downloading. I'd like to push this out today so everything is synced for tomorrow. Note that likely we will want to improve this after release as we have to update it anytime the versions change, but for Beta this should be sufficient. +1s? diff --git a/roles/fedora-web/getfedora/files/cron-sync-getfedora b/roles/fedora-web/getfedora/files/cron-sync-getfedora index 8de6dbd..54ba1cb 100644 --- a/roles/fedora-web/getfedora/files/cron-sync-getfedora +++ b/roles/fedora-web/getfedora/files/cron-sync-getfedora @@ -1 +1,2 @@ 25 * * * * root /usr/bin/rsync --delete -a --no-owner --no-group sundries01::getfedora.org/ /srv/web/getfedora.org/ +30 * * * * root /usr/bin/rsync --delete -a --no-owner --no-group sundries01::fmw/ /srv/web/fmw/ diff --git a/roles/fedora-web/getfedora/files/getfedora.org.conf b/roles/fedora-web/getfedora/files/getfedora.org.conf index 14c5fed..456592c 100644 --- a/roles/fedora-web/getfedora/files/getfedora.org.conf +++ b/roles/fedora-web/getfedora/files/getfedora.org.conf @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@ Alias /favicon.ico /srv/web/fedoraproject.org/static/images/favicon.ico AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html text/plain text/xml text/css application/x-javascript +Alias /FedoraMediaWriter-osx-3.97.1-17-g480c143.dmg /srv/web/fwm/FedoraMediaWriter-osx-3.97.1-17-g480c143.dmg +Alias /FedoraMediaWriter-win-3.97.1-17-g480c143.exe /srv/web/fmw/FedoraMediaWriter-win-3.97.1-17-g480c143.exe + FileETag MTime Size ExpiresActive On diff --git a/roles/rsyncd/files/rsyncd.conf.sundries-stg b/roles/rsyncd/files/rsyncd.conf.sundries-stg index 53c2deb..36f9378 100644 --- a/roles/rsyncd/files/rsyncd.conf.sundries-stg +++ b/roles/rsyncd/files/rsyncd.conf.sundries-stg @@ -173,3 +173,11 @@ uid = root gid = root read only = yes hosts allow = 10.5.126.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 + +[fmw] +comment = fmw +path = /srv/web/fmw +uid = root +gid = root +read only = yes +hosts allow = 10.5.126.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0

3 5

Freeze break: fix base role for docker in stg
by Kevin Fenzi 10 Oct '16

10 Oct '16

Greetings. Over the weekend we deployed a test mirrormanager2-mirrorlist docker container on proxy01.stg. However, that added a weird new network interface there that breaks our base role. This should fix it... +1s? diff --git a/roles/base/tasks/main.yml b/roles/base/tasks/main.yml index 6dfd4f9..7706a80 100644 --- a/roles/base/tasks/main.yml +++ b/roles/base/tasks/main.yml @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ # - restart NetworkManager - reload NetworkManager-connections - apply interface-changes - when: (virthost is not defined) and (not item.startswith('tun')) and (not item.startswith('virbr')) and (not item.startswith('vnet')) and (hostvars[inventory_hostname]['ansible_' + item.replace('-','_')]['type'] == 'ether') and (ansible_distribution_major_version|int >=7) and hostvars[inventory_hostname]['ansible_' + item.replace('-','_')]['active'] and nmclitest|success and ( not ansible_ifcfg_blacklist ) and ( ansible_ifcfg_whitelist is not defined or item in ansible_ifcfg_whitelist ) + when: (virthost is not defined) and (item.startswith(('eth','br'))) and (hostvars[inventory_hostname]['ansible_' + item.replace('-','_')]['type'] == 'ether') and (ansible_distribution_major_version|int >=7) and hostvars[inventory_hostname]['ansible_' + item.replace('-','_')]['active'] and nmclitest|success and ( not ansible_ifcfg_blacklist ) and ( ansible_ifcfg_whitelist is not defined or item in ansible_ifcfg_whitelist ) tags: - config - ifcfg

3 2

Freeze Break Request pungi update
by Dennis Gilmore 08 Oct '16

08 Oct '16

Hi all, We have fixed a few bugs in pungi for supporting the workstation ostree installer and I would like to get pung-4.1.10 deployed on the compose boxes. The upstream change log is: - pungi: Replace kickstart repo url (mark) - ostree-installer: Reduce duplication in tests (lsedlar) - ostree-installer: Generate correct volume ID (lsedlar) - ostree-installer: Use ostree as type in filename (lsedlar) - ostree: Use $basearch in repo file (lsedlar) - config: Accept empty branch in SCM dict (lsedlar) - Remove duplicated version from pungi script (lsedlar) - use --new-chroot when making ostree's (dennis) - Merge #404 `Remove FSF address from file headers` (dennis) - Merge #409 `Translate paths without double slash` (dennis) - Create git tags without release (lsedlar) - Translate paths without double slash (lsedlar) - Remove shebangs from non-executable files (lsedlar) - Remove FSF address from comments (lsedlar) - Update contributing guide (lsedlar) - init: Remove keep_original_comps option (lsedlar) - tests: Use unittest2 consistently (lsedlar) This will help make it clear that the installer iso is a ostree installer and not a traditional installer Dennis

4 4

Meeting Agenda Item: Introduction Dmitry Saunin
by Dmitry Saunin 08 Oct '16

08 Oct '16

Hello! My name is Dmitry, I'am from Moscow(Russia) GMT+4, my IRC nickname: saunind. Currently I'am working as a network engineer. I have used Fedora Core on my laptops more than year and a half. I experienced with UNIX systems administration (Solaris, HP-UX, FreeBSD). Now i want to be a part of the "Fedora Infrastructure team", improve my Linux and English skills. I'am interesting in LInux OS(Performance tuning, troubleshooting and monitoring), Ansible, Databases, LAMP, Python and all other parts of Fedora Infrastructure. Best regards, Dmitry.

1 0

[Freeze Break Request] Add missing settings to Bodhi's production.ini file
by Randy Barlow 08 Oct '16

08 Oct '16

We've been getting reports that some users aren't getting Bodhi e-mails when their updates are eligible for pushing to stable, and then confusingly other users are getting e-mails every 6 hours about it. I believe I've found the problem, which I've documented here: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/1009#issuecomment-25239191 1 To fix this, I think we just need to add these two lines to Bodhi's production.ini.j2 setting in Ansible: testing_approval_msg_based_on_karma = This update has reached the stable karma threshold and can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes. not_yet_tested_msg_based_on_karma = This update has not reached the stable karma threshold. While I was in there, I did a git diff between the production.ini from Bodhi's git repo and the one in Ansible, and though there were a lot of changes I don't believe we need to change anything else. So what do you think, shall I add those two settings on production?

3 3

October status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
by Kevin Fenzi 07 Oct '16

07 Oct '16

You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the infrastructure list). Feel free to reply just directly to me, or cc the infrastructure list for everyone to see and comment on. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Apprentice At the first of every month(or so), I am going to be sending out an email like this one. I would like feedback on how things are going for you. I'd like to ask for everyone to send me a quick reply with the following data or anything related you can think of that might help us make the apprentice program more useful. 0. Whats your fedora account system login? 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute to more? 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice 'easyfix' tickets? https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&tags=easyfix 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help you do any of the above? 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? Finding tickets in your interest area? 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them helpful or interesting? 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby 9. Whats your favorite Halloween food? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halloween#Food Any other general feedback is also quite welcome, including improvements to this email, the wiki page, etc. Any folks I do not hear from in the next week will be removed from the group. (Note that it's easy to be readded when you have time or whatever and it's nothing at all personal, we just want to keep the group up to date with active folks). Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback! kevin

20 19

open issue to fix zanata bug
by Catalin 06 Oct '16

06 Oct '16

karma ? I open this https://zanata.atlassian.net/browse/ZNTA-1428 Thank you.

1 0

Mailman or Hyperkitty bug ?
by Charles-Antoine Couret 06 Oct '16

06 Oct '16

Hello everybody, The mailing-list fr-users (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fr-users@lists.fedoraproject.…) has some issues for 2-3 weeks, maybe just after the mailman update. For example, in archives, weekly Reminder (each Monday) about meeting are not there. But we received these emails (26th September and 3rd October). And I sent some emails as answer (with Thunderbird), but nobody received that. I didn't receive errors from server. It is very strange, for example one person sent this night a email without issue. Before that, I didn't have issue too, with the same email address or configuration. Do you have an idea about that? I am available if you need more details. Have a nice day, Regards, Charles-Antoine Couret

3 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

infrastructure October 2016