infrastructure July 2019

infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

19 participants
24 discussions

About JS framework
by Pierre-Yves Chibon 17 Oct '22

17 Oct '22

Good Morning Everyone, Our infrastructure is mostly a python store, meaning almost all our apps are written in python and most using wsgi. However in python we are using a number of framework: * flask for most * pyramid for some of the biggest (bodhi, FAS3) * Django (askbot, Hyperkitty) * TurboGears2 (fedora-packages) * aiohttp (python3, async app: mdapi) While this makes sometime things difficult, these are fairly standard framework and most of our developers are able to help on all. However, as I see us starting to look at JS for some of our apps (fedora-hubs, wartaa...), I wonder if we could start the discussion early about the different framework and eventually see if we can unify around one. This would also allow those of us not familiar with any JS framework to look at the recommended one instead of picking one up semi-randomly. So has anyone experience with one or more JS framework? Do you have one that would you recommend? Why? Thanks for your inputs, Pierre

10 12

Re: Deprecating Autocloud
by Sinny Kumari 06 Dec '19

06 Dec '19

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:47 PM Kamil Paral <kparal(a)redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:39 AM Sinny Kumari <ksinny(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:19 AM Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote: >> >>> Or could we move f29+ all to whatever is replacing it? (taskotron?) >>> >> >> It will be nice but I am not aware of any other system in place which >> would >> replace checks performed by autocloud. >> >> (CC'ed tflink and kparal) >> Does taskotron provides capability to perform tests on Fedora cloud >> Images like booting images and other basic checks? >> > > Theoretically it is possible using nested virt. However, Taskotron is > going away as well. The replacement is Fedora CI: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/ > Thanks kamil! yeah, it doesn't make sense to move to Taskotron if it is going to be deprecated as well. > I recommend to ask in the CI list: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ci%40lists.fedoraproject.org/ > > It should be possible for them to provide the infrastructure you need. > Hmm, I am not very sure if we should spend time investigating and setting up alternative to autocloud unless we have usecases for long run. Fedora Atomic Host Two Week releases ends with F29 EOL. -- http://sinny.io/

5 11

[PATCH] Add a nagios check for each rabbitmq server
by Jeremy Cline 03 Aug '19

03 Aug '19

Commit eae92f73e95 installed the nagios scripts[0] that are packaged for epel7-infra on the RabbitMQ hosts. This is an attempt to use them with nagios. I don't know anything about nagios though, so I have no idea if this is even close to right, or if it works. [0] https://github.com/nagios-plugins-rabbitmq/nagios-plugins-rabbitmq Signed-off-by: Jeremy Cline <jcline(a)redhat.com> --- roles/nagios_client/tasks/main.yml | 15 +++++++++++++ .../templates/check_rabbitmq_server.cfg.j2 | 1 + roles/nagios_server/tasks/main.yml | 22 +++++++++++++++++++ .../nrpe/check_rabbitmq_server.cfg.j2 | 1 + 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+) create mode 100644 roles/nagios_client/templates/check_rabbitmq_server.cfg.j2 create mode 100644 roles/nagios_server/templates/nrpe/check_rabbitmq_server.cfg.j2 diff --git a/roles/nagios_client/tasks/main.yml b/roles/nagios_client/tasks/main.yml index 0259a43ca..65a60a7c3 100644 --- a/roles/nagios_client/tasks/main.yml +++ b/roles/nagios_client/tasks/main.yml @@ -233,6 +233,21 @@ tags: - nagios_client +- name: install nrpe checks for the RabbitMQ cluster + template: + src: "{{ item }}.j2" + dest: "/etc/nrpe.d/{{ item }}" + owner: root + group: root + mode: 0600 + with_items: + - check_rabbitmq_server.cfg + when: inventory_hostname.startswith('rabbitmq') + notify: + - restart nrpe + tags: + - nagios_client + - name: nrpe service start service: name=nrpe state=started enabled=true tags: diff --git a/roles/nagios_client/templates/check_rabbitmq_server.cfg.j2 b/roles/nagios_client/templates/check_rabbitmq_server.cfg.j2 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..498a8757e --- /dev/null +++ b/roles/nagios_client/templates/check_rabbitmq_server.cfg.j2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +command[check_nrpe_check_rabbitmq_server]=exec /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins-rabbitmq/check_rabbitmq_server -H localhost --password "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary(rabbitmq_monitoring_password_production, rabbitmq_monitoring_password_staging) }}" --user nagios-monitoring diff --git a/roles/nagios_server/tasks/main.yml b/roles/nagios_server/tasks/main.yml index 2d6d50c31..f61584ed6 100644 --- a/roles/nagios_server/tasks/main.yml +++ b/roles/nagios_server/tasks/main.yml @@ -110,6 +110,28 @@ - config - nagios_server +- name: Ensure the nrpe.d directory exists for nrpe configs + file: + dest: /etc/nrpe.d + state: directory + tags: + - nagios_server + +- name: Add nrpe configurations to /etc/nrpe.d + template: + src: "/nrpe/{{ item }}.j2" + dest: "/etc/nrpe.d/{{ item }}" + owner: root + group: root + mode: 0600 + with_items: + - check_rabbitmq_server.cfg + notify: + - restart nrpe + tags: + - config + - nagios_server + ## Copy over the nagios configs - name: Copy /etc/nagios/conf.d/*cfg files copy: src=nagios/configs/{{ item }} dest=/etc/nagios/conf.d/{{ item }} diff --git a/roles/nagios_server/templates/nrpe/check_rabbitmq_server.cfg.j2 b/roles/nagios_server/templates/nrpe/check_rabbitmq_server.cfg.j2 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..498a8757e --- /dev/null +++ b/roles/nagios_server/templates/nrpe/check_rabbitmq_server.cfg.j2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +command[check_nrpe_check_rabbitmq_server]=exec /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins-rabbitmq/check_rabbitmq_server -H localhost --password "{{ (env == 'production')|ternary(rabbitmq_monitoring_password_production, rabbitmq_monitoring_password_staging) }}" --user nagios-monitoring -- 2.21.0

3 7

Please have a look at this python-docutils bug
by Miro Hrončok 02 Aug '19

02 Aug '19

Hey Infra SIG! I've previously sent this to infra-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org but that list is private, so reposting here: -------- Forwarded Message -------- This bugzilla is assigned to the Fedora Infrastructure SIG. There has been no response for a month. Please, could you have a look? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716532 Thanks, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

2 1

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Infrastructure
by smooge＠gmail.com 31 Jul '19

31 Jul '19

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Infrastructure on 2019-08-01 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Weekly Fedora Infrastructure meeting. See infrastructure list for agenda a day before or view it at https://infinote.fedoraproject.org/cgit/infinote/tree/fedora-infrastructure… Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/22/

1 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Infrastructure
by smooge＠gmail.com 24 Jul '19

24 Jul '19

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Infrastructure on 2019-07-25 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Weekly Fedora Infrastructure meeting. See infrastructure list for agenda a day before or view it at https://infinote.fedoraproject.org/cgit/infinote/tree/fedora-infrastructure… Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/22/

2 1

Funnelling newcomers to Fedora Join: taking over newbie group membership
by Ankur Sinha 22 Jul '19

22 Jul '19

Hello, We've written a proposal here[1] to move to a more people-centric workflow for newcomers. The idea is that instead of asking newcomers to dive in to tasks as we do now, we'll make them get to know the people in the community first. You can read more on the ticket. As part of this, we were hoping to set up an FAS group for newbies, and let the Join SIG add newcomers to it while they find their teams and tasks of interest in the community. In this workflow, infra would no longer have to maintain the wikiedit group as they do so now. It really shouldn't be infra's job in the first place :) What do we think? Please leave your comments on the ticket. The plan is only a proposal and will change as we get more feedback from the community. [1] https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/147 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London

4 4

Anitya 0.16.1 (release-monitoring.org) deployed on production
by Michal Konecny 22 Jul '19

22 Jul '19

Hi everybody, I want to announce that the Anitya 0.16.1 was deployed on production (https://release-monitoring.org/) The main change is conversion of cronjob, that was checking for new versions, to service, which is more reliable. This version also solves the issue with error 500 when accessing packages within specific distribution. Full changelog could be found here https://github.com/release-monitoring/anitya/releases/tag/0.16.0 https://github.com/release-monitoring/anitya/releases/tag/0.16.1 Regards, mkonecny P.S.: There were some issues during deployment of new version, so the release-monitoring.org was unavailable for few minutes. I apology for any inconvenience this caused.

1 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Infrastructure
by smooge＠gmail.com 17 Jul '19

17 Jul '19

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Infrastructure on 2019-07-18 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Weekly Fedora Infrastructure meeting. See infrastructure list for agenda a day before or view it at https://infinote.fedoraproject.org/cgit/infinote/tree/fedora-infrastructure… Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/22/

1 0

Greenwave release
by Giulia Naponiello 17 Jul '19

17 Jul '19

Hello, I'm going to release now to a new version of Greenwave (1.2.1). It shouldn't take long. I'll let you know once is done. Cheers Giulia

1 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

infrastructure July 2019