On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:24 PM SmootherFrOgZ <lxtnow(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 6:49 AM Ryan Lerch <rlerch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Just wondering if there is anyone around here that is actively (or
> semi-actively) maintaining the Fedora Badges system(s).
>
> The reason for this query is that we are currently working on the
> datanommer / datagrepper transition to Fedora Messaging, and Fedora
> Badges is revealing itself to be a special side-case.
>
> The majority of applications use the datagrepper JSON API to interact
> with the store of messages that datanommer stuffs into its database.
> However, badges appears to have direct access to the datanommer DB
> using the datanommer.models module (which we use in datagrepper too,
> obviously) Note too that FMN also hase this direct access rather than
> using datanommer
>
> This in of itself doesnt seem to be a huge issue to the migration, as
> the grep method of datanommer.models has not changed its API (which is
> all these apps use to get data with), so in theory, we just need to
> update datanommer.models on these applications and everything should
> be hunky-dory.
>
> However, neither of these applications are running currently on
> staging, so there is nowhere fo us to test this out.
>
> Long story long, just wondering if anyone is aware of any activeish
> maintainers of these items so we can discuss further.
>
Hey Ryan,
We can for sure work something out and update the necessary bits.
Would you mind opening up a ticket and mentioning me so I can look at this?
Ok -- we have this ticket open on datanommer if that helps:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/datanommer/issues/151
cheers,
ryanlerch