It appears that the conversion fo python3 on fedbages was done about a
year ago -- but never released or deployed into production.
There is some discussion on this ticket here:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/datanommer/issues/151
and also an infra ticket here:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10192
cheers,
ryanlerch
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 6:25 PM Ryan Lerch <rlerch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:24 PM SmootherFrOgZ <lxtnow(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 6:49 AM Ryan Lerch <rlerch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Just wondering if there is anyone around here that is actively (or
>> semi-actively) maintaining the Fedora Badges system(s).
>>
>> The reason for this query is that we are currently working on the
>> datanommer / datagrepper transition to Fedora Messaging, and Fedora
>> Badges is revealing itself to be a special side-case.
>>
>> The majority of applications use the datagrepper JSON API to interact
>> with the store of messages that datanommer stuffs into its database.
>> However, badges appears to have direct access to the datanommer DB
>> using the datanommer.models module (which we use in datagrepper too,
>> obviously) Note too that FMN also hase this direct access rather than
>> using datanommer
>>
>> This in of itself doesnt seem to be a huge issue to the migration, as
>> the grep method of datanommer.models has not changed its API (which is
>> all these apps use to get data with), so in theory, we just need to
>> update datanommer.models on these applications and everything should
>> be hunky-dory.
>>
>> However, neither of these applications are running currently on
>> staging, so there is nowhere fo us to test this out.
>>
>> Long story long, just wondering if anyone is aware of any activeish
>> maintainers of these items so we can discuss further.
>>
> Hey Ryan,
>
> We can for sure work something out and update the necessary bits.
> Would you mind opening up a ticket and mentioning me so I can look at this?
Ok -- we have this ticket open on datanommer if that helps:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/datanommer/issues/151
cheers,
ryanlerch