Mike McGrath wrote:
Wilmer Jaramillo M. wrote:
>
> Why in instead cacti should used
http://www.zenoss.com/ ?
AFAIK, zenoss isn't in Fedora yet.
I believe Scott over at
atomicrocketturtle.com was looking into
packaging Zenoss, but found the code was pretty messy. Binaries in
source rpms, different source rpms for different distributions... I
believe there is some work to do there. But it looks like a pretty nice
monitoring solution. I use ZABBIX <
http://www.zabbix.com/> myself.
Nils Breunese.