-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/30/2009 12:52 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Stefan Schlesinger wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 29, 2009, at 01:38 , Mike McGrath wrote:
>>>> I'd like someone to write a pam module to auth against fas. I'm
not sure
>>>> it's the way to go but I'd like to have something up and running
to test
>>>> with to see how it behaves, how it deals with some failure scenarios,
etc.
>>> I'm not sure what exactly you want to do, but pam_ldap should do what
>>> you want, right? Or at least one could use it as codebase and modify it.
>>>
>> pam_ldap would probably be close to what we want and certainly a good
>> place to look but we don't run an ldap server so it won't auth against
>> fas.
>>
> Well normally what I have seen is that the 'FAS' server would export a
> schema table to LDAP and LDAP would then be what is authenticated to
> (the same with Kerberos if combined). Or the FAS server has a
> mysql/postgres background and someone uses pam/mod mysql to do it.
>
> The one problem with custom pam modules is usually the 'oooooooh'
> moment when something doesn't work quite as planned (hey look I can
> sudo root as apache? how did that happen?)
>
This is a legit and good concern. Ricky and I were talking about it last
night. Since we're re-thinking things I'm open to suggestions. Might be
something as simple as getting an ldap server to communicate with a
postgres backend?
-Mike
Sorry for butting in like this, but I always assumed FAS would use LDAP
as a backend, so that 3rd parties, if they wanted to plug in to the
system, would utilize LDAP. Is that not the case?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkn4ivUACgkQaVgOCFr0s2KkpgCdFx3iwUM8IbWPjVEufFRDnM5d
b6EAnAsXyj03UIMbMy0wGDi9+n/ZC8eT
=oyjc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----