This [1] advisory was pushed into stable. Why Bodhi did not closed the associated ticket in BZ [2]?
Thanks
Vít
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7282 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947408
On Tue, 21 May 2013 12:46:26 +0200 Vít Ondruch vondruch@redhat.com wrote:
This [1] advisory was pushed into stable. Why Bodhi did not closed the associated ticket in BZ [2]?
Thanks
I think this was due to the issue noted in https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/702 Which has since been fixed.
However, I think Luke was going to try and run a one off script to go back and do all the closures that didn't happen while the bug was going on, but this has not yet happened.
kevin
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:46:26PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
This [1] advisory was pushed into stable. Why Bodhi did not closed the associated ticket in BZ [2]?
Thanks for pointing this out, Vít. I wrote some scripts[0] that were supposed to clean up these stray bugs from the time we upgraded our python-bugzilla package, but I only set the script to look from 2013-05-06 onwards. I'll modify the script and re-run it and try to catch the remainder of these bugs.
Thanks,
luke
[0]: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/bodhi.git/commit/?h=develop&id=2d5acd1...
Dne 21.5.2013 21:36, Luke Macken napsal(a):
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:46:26PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
This [1] advisory was pushed into stable. Why Bodhi did not closed the associated ticket in BZ [2]?
Thanks for pointing this out, Vít. I wrote some scripts[0] that were supposed to clean up these stray bugs from the time we upgraded our python-bugzilla package, but I only set the script to look from 2013-05-06 onwards. I'll modify the script and re-run it and try to catch the remainder of these bugs.
Thanks,
luke
Thanks. My ticket is closed now.
Vít
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Kevin Fenzi -
Luke Macken -
Vít Ondruch