I'd like one of our volunteers to install opengroupware on a publictest server for our evaluation. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1197 This is going to take between 5 and 15 hours a week. Don't volunteer unless you can commit that much time to it.

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > I'd like one of our volunteers to install opengroupware on a publictest > server for our evaluation. > > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1197 > > This is going to take between 5 and 15 hours a week. Don't volunteer > unless you can commit that much time to it. I can commit some time from the coming week. (23rd.) If that is ok, I can do it. It has been long since I have something for Infra. :) Thanks.

> Works for me, I may partner a couple of people on this but ping me next > week and we'll figure out what to do next. ping. I am back. -- Regards, Susmit.

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, susmit shannigrahi wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > I'd like one of our volunteers to install opengroupware on a publictest > > server for our evaluation. > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1197 > > > > This is going to take between 5 and 15 hours a week. Don't volunteer > > unless you can commit that much time to it. > > I can commit some time from the coming week. (23rd.) > If that is ok, I can do it. > It has been long since I have something for Infra. :) > Thanks. > Just checking in, how did things go? Any updates? Any one else interested in joining susmit to get this up and running? -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

2009/2/27 TJ Davis <tjdavisbz(a)gmail.com&gt;: > I can spare a few hours a week to work on it. I might need someone to > mentor me on it if that is an option because I am new other than the time > that I was looking at the redundant OpenVPN scenarios with you. What groups > would I need to apply for? Username is tjdavisbz. > > > TJ Davis > > TJ, Welcome. Join the sysadmin-test group in FAS. I'm in the same boat as you, a few hours to spare every week. Cheers, Clint _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, TJ Davis wrote: > Thanks, I have applied for sysadmin-test. > Right now susmit has lead on this but I'm not sure what his time constraints are over the next couple of weeks.  If he's busy I'll just make sure you guys all have access and can hammer away at it a couple of hours at a time.

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:50 PM, susmit shannigrahi <thinklinux.ssh(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > 2009/2/28 Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com&gt;: >> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, TJ Davis wrote: >> >>> Thanks, I have applied for sysadmin-test. >>> >> >> Right now susmit has lead on this but I'm not sure what his time >> constraints are over the next couple of weeks.  If he's busy I'll just >> make sure you guys all have access and can hammer away at it a couple of >> hours at a time. > > No, I can commit time right now. > I was away a couple of days, I read up the documentations. > If I get a couple of more people, it will be nice. :) > So I'll note that when looking at this recently I see that Skyrix/Inverse released Scalable OGo (It was a custom solution at one point which was OGo without the document management system/crm-like components.) I've managed a few hundred user instance of OGo, but SOGo was made to handle tens of thousands of users, and it looks a bit simpler. I also fear that OGo is approaching stagnation, it could just be that it has reached maturity and changes aren't that big of a deal.. While the changelog rss feed showed 5 or so commits, it looks like a lot of the other things are slow - nothing more recent than FC3 instructions or packages. Apparently back in the RHEL3 time frame Harald Hoyer was maintaining some RPM packages, but the spec files/srpms seem to have disappeared. Take a look at scalable ogo: http://scalableogo.org

2009/3/1 Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com&gt;: > What are your concerns about ogo stagnation?  Does sogo have more > momentum or is it just a new fork? > I see the following potential things which lead me to believe that OGo is stagnated or close to it: September of 2007 appears to be the last time the website was updated for OGo. The -users list had 36 messages in February, 16 in January, none in December and 8 in November. Moreover of the two projects OGo is far more complex. Latest packages for the Fedora/RHEL world include FC[1-3], RH9 and RHEL3. Contrast that with Scalable OGo The users mailing list had 123 messages in February and 85 in January. (and I didn't look further) Website last updated 2009-01-30 Packages exist for RHEL5 Scalable OGo was really a project that Skyrix (the company behind OGo) took on as project work for a customer and eventually released as open source. So yes it's technically a fork, but not in the bad sense of the word. Moreover the fact that SOGo doesn't have the public file storage and document management system aspect which means it's less complex for us. Regardless it does seem to have more momentum. That said I merely toss that out there for consideration. Others are doing the work, and I don't want to bikeshed this, so feel free to ignore me.

> WORKSFORME, lets set it up.  No harm in taking a look at it. I had a question, should I do it the puppet way or locally on publictest15 ?

Hi, On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:03:22AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > I'd like one of our volunteers to install opengroupware on a publictest > server for our evaluation. > > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1197 > > This is going to take between 5 and 15 hours a week. Don't volunteer > unless you can commit that much time to it. I've tried to setup ogo a couple of times, and it is cumbersome work. I also tried to package it and push it into Fedora, but that's non-trivial, from the use of non-FHSable gnustep-make to an own foundation library to non-compliant init scripts in sope etc. The gnustep-make package for example needs to currently "decide" at build time whether to support ogo or the rest of gnustep-* packages in the review queue. :( I dont know about sogo, I hope things have improved (at least the binary packages' versions show updates needed for bridging the gap between gnustep-* and ogo), and the evaluation will show the status, but from what I've looked up recently it looks like bedework is also a good candidate for a Fedora calendaring system. http://www.bedework.org/bedework/ Please consider giving bedework a try as well.

On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Axel Thimm wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:03:22AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > > I'd like one of our volunteers to install opengroupware on a publictest > > server for our evaluation.