On 04/04/2017 10:52 AM, dennis(a)ausil.us wrote: > From: Dennis Gilmore <ausil(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; > > rawhide-composer should never have been frozen. it has no impact on the > release deliverables, and we may want to deploy changes needing changes > on the compose box or update packages to account for rawhide changes at > any point in time. So mark not freezing > > Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore <ausil(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; > --- > inventory/host_vars/rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/inventory/host_vars/rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org b/inventory/host_vars/rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org > index f12e921..f5a49ee 100644 > --- a/inventory/host_vars/rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org > +++ b/inventory/host_vars/rawhide-composer.phx2.fedoraproject.org > @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ kojipkgs_url: kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org > kojihub_url: koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub > kojihub_scheme: https > > +# rawhide is never frozen, the compose box should not be so we can make needed changes > +freezes: false > + > fedmsg_certs: > - service: releng > owner: root Seems completely reasonable to me. :) +1 kevin _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org