Hello.
Please look at rpm-ostree issue #1493 on github [1].
In short, "rpm-ostree install kernel-modules-extra" doesn't work [1]
and journalctl reports a lot of coredumps.
This seems to happen only if on my Rasperry Pi 3. No problem so far
using Fedora IOT on KVM (x86_64 or aarch64). And no issues also using
F28 IOT on the same RPi3.
In addition, it seems to crash only installing kernel-modules-extra,
it worked with any other package I have installed (overlayed?).
Yeah, I don't know what I'm doing :-) but I just report this behaviour
I've observed.
[1] <https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1493>
[2] Running post scripts... error: Running %post for
kernel-modules-extra: Executing bwrap(/bin/sh): Child process killed
by signal 7; run `journalctl -t
'rpm-ostree(kernel-modules-extra.post)'` for more information
Thanks,
A.
=================================================
#fedora-meeting: Fedora IoT Working Group Meeting
=================================================
Meeting started by pbrobinson at 14:01:23 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-08-29/fedora_iot_work…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* roll call (pbrobinson, 14:01:23)
* 1) ==== Working Group process and admin ==== (pbrobinson, 14:03:25)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/InternetOfThings/PRD
(pbrobinson, 14:03:40)
* reminder 1 more week for feedback to the IoT PRD (pbrobinson,
14:03:53)
* 2) ==== Nightly builds ==== (pbrobinson, 14:08:50)
* Fedora 29 branched builds are now running (pbrobinson, 14:09:06)
* Fedora 30 rawhide builds are also in place, a little more fragile
(pbrobinson, 14:11:23)
* 3) ==== IoT Testing ==== (pbrobinson, 14:16:13)
* 4) ==== Fedora 29 status for IoT ==== (pbrobinson, 14:22:57)
* fedora 29 is now in freeze for beta, bodhi has also been enabled so
all updates will need to be submitted there (pbrobinson, 14:23:31)
* we now have a fedora-release-iot package and associated policy. I'm
going to start to review how we tighten the OS for IoT,
feedback/suggestions are welcome (pbrobinson, 14:25:29)
* 5) ==== Open Floor ==== (pbrobinson, 14:27:40)
Meeting ended at 14:32:21 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* pbrobinson (43)
* pwhalen (15)
* zodbot (10)
* bcotton (4)
* jsmith (2)
* misc (1)
* hopley (1)
* tim-jones (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
=================================================
#fedora-meeting: Fedora IoT Working Group Meeting
=================================================
Meeting started by pbrobinson at 14:00:13 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-08-22/fedora_iot_work…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* roll call (pbrobinson, 14:00:13)
* 1) ==== Working Group process and admin ==== (pbrobinson, 14:04:23)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/InternetOfThings/PRD
(pbrobinson, 14:04:40)
* PRD draft done, feedback welcome (pbrobinson, 14:04:59)
* PRD still needs some more development in the Personas, Use Cases,
and Success Metrics areas (bcotton, 14:07:18)
* feedback for IoT PRD required within two weeks and then we'll get it
wrapped up and approved
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/InternetOfThings/PRD (pbrobinson,
14:15:28)
* 2) ==== Nightly builds ==== (pbrobinson, 14:15:46)
* Fedora 29 has branched off rawhide, rawhide is now Fedora 30
(pbrobinson, 14:16:08)
* #IoT nightlies will branch and follow that process in the next day
or so, pbrobinson will send an email to the list when he's completed
it (pbrobinson, 14:16:50)
* Fedora 28 composes are now mostly static with purely updates and no
further feature development happening there, F-29+ is where it's
happening (pbrobinson, 14:21:07)
* 3) ==== IoT Testing and CI/CD ==== (pbrobinson, 14:24:20)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1615895 (lorbus,
14:28:21)
* 4) ==== Fedora 29 status for IoT ==== (pbrobinson, 14:32:23)
* IoT pieces still to come for Fedora 29 (pbrobinson, 14:36:11)
* a fedora-release-iot with associated policies (pbrobinson,
14:36:22)
* UEFI on ARMv7 which is almost there, just wrangling the last bits
here to land, hopefully by the end of the week, providing ARMv7 32
bit images for IoT (pbrobinson, 14:36:43)
* the ability to turn off weak dependencies in rpm-ostree, that's just
landed for review upstream, it will help us trim the size of the
image a little (pbrobinson, 14:36:59)
* 5) ==== Flock conference ==== (pbrobinson, 14:43:32)
* a lot covered at Flock (pbrobinson, 14:43:51)
* all recorded sessions will have videos published in time
(pbrobinson, 14:44:11)
* 6) ==== Open Floor ==== (pbrobinson, 14:45:21)
* lorbus (Christian Glombek) has successfully completed his GSoC
GreenBoot project! Very pleased with the outcome and I look forward
to seeing it evolve further (pbrobinson, 14:46:56)
* a very useful tool for IoT in particular, but rpm-ostree in general
and in the further Fedora CoreOS (pbrobinson, 14:47:26)
Meeting ended at 14:51:12 UTC.
Action Items
------------
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* pbrobinson (69)
* lorbus (18)
* zodbot (13)
* pwhalen (8)
* bcotton (8)
* Tim-Jones (4)
* alciregi (3)
* tim-jones (2)
* x3mboy (1)
* jsmith (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
Hi,
I have spent some time exploring rpm-ostree on fedora atomic host and
fedora-iot to see how it worked in practice, to determine whether to
consider moving from an ubuntu based (pi-3) home hub for our IoT platform
to fedora to enable easier updating of the OS image and our local platform
services and applications, as well as, secondarily, considering the
benefits of a similar migration for the cloud-based elements of our
platform.
I've been composing custom trees on top of the various Fedora edtions,
atomic host and fedora-iot on both x86_64 and aarch64 hosts and updating
this various ways, layering packages, rebasing, upgrading, rolling back
etc.
To date, the custom trees have all been based on atomic host rather than
IoT, because whilst I could find the atomic host tree definition repo (at
https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/tree/master) I have been unable to find
similar for fedora-IoT.
Could someone point me in the right direction please?
Thanks,
Tim
--
*Dr. Tim Jones*
founder
pumpco ltd
Langley Gate
Kington Langley
Wiltshire SN15 5SE
mobile: (07919) 694 304
email: tim(a)pumpco.uk
web: www.pumpco.uk & inqube.at