4:08 p.m.
Hi Jared,
Sorry for this taking so long. I finally got some time to work on the
gateway rpm. Though really, I need a second opinion to see if I
should proceed with what I've done or try something else.
As discussed a while ago, I have tried my hand at bundling the gateway
nodejs dependencies. The biggest problem with that was there was
several binary packages that it wanted. In the end, I bundled
everything but those packages, and those packages I created links in
the bundle. So the package depends on those binary nodejs packages,
but everything else is bundled.
I'm attaching my spec file, along with the gateway-tarball.sh that
does the bundling.
Could you let me know what you think?
I'm totally open to being completely wrong. This is the first time
I've done a nodejs bundling.
Troy
p.s. I figured I'd cc the rest of the iot mailling list incase anyone
else on here has any ideas.
2:03 a.m.
Hi Troy,
I don't have the knowledge about the nodejs side of things but a few
other notes.
Overall I think we should call the package something more descriptive
such as mozilla-iot-gateway as gateway could mean a number of things.
In terms of dependencies I suspect we'll likely need some more around
other deps, and likely some optional supported stacks like openzwave
and related but that can evolve as we go.
Peter
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:09 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jared,
> Sorry for this taking so long. I finally got some time to work on the
> gateway rpm. Though really, I need a second opinion to see if I
> should proceed with what I've done or try something else.
>
> As discussed a while ago, I have tried my hand at bundling the gateway
> nodejs dependencies. The biggest problem with that was there was
> several binary packages that it wanted. In the end, I bundled
> everything but those packages, and those packages I created links in
> the bundle. So the package depends on those binary nodejs packages,
> but everything else is bundled.
>
> I'm attaching my spec file, along with the gateway-tarball.sh that
> does the bundling.
>
> Could you let me know what you think?
>
> I'm totally open to being completely wrong. This is the first time
> I've done a nodejs bundling.
>
> Troy
> p.s. I figured I'd cc the rest of the iot mailling list incase anyone
> else on here has any ideas.
> _______________________________________________
> IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
8:43 a.m.
Both of those are very good points.
Name: I like what you proposed mozilla-iot-gateway ... The only issue
I have with it is the "mozilla" point. I'm worried that people will
think it's a browser plugin, or something like that. I went to their
webpage [1] and they are calling it "Things Gateway" ... because it is
part of "Project Things". So how about
project-things-gateway or maybe just things-gateway
Supported Stacks: Here's an interesting tidbit. When you install
things-gateway (that's what I'm going to call it in this email) you
really only get the gateway, no supporting stacks.
You can run the gateway, and it will *look* like and act like
everything is installed. You can click on LIFX or TP-Link, and the
web interface will say that they are loaded and all that. But then
you won't be able to see or work with any of those things. You might
think maybe you have a firewall issue, or something like that.
But if you look at your server logs, it's spitting out (over and over
again) errors saying that it can't find those modules.
If you look at the mozilla-iot github area,[2] you'll see all of those
stacks, each in their own github repo. Several aren't even nodejs.
The takeaway is that we need to package each of those things as their
own gateway module, named something like
things-gateway-zigbee
things-gateway-tplink
That is one of the bugs/issues that I want to file with them.
But it looks like version 7.0 is close to being released, so I'm going
to wait until that is released before I file any more bugs.
Troy
[1] - https://mozilla-iot.github.io/
[2] - https://github.com/mozilla-iot
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:04 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Troy,
>
> I don't have the knowledge about the nodejs side of things but a few
> other notes.
>
> Overall I think we should call the package something more descriptive
> such as mozilla-iot-gateway as gateway could mean a number of things.
>
> In terms of dependencies I suspect we'll likely need some more around
> other deps, and likely some optional supported stacks like openzwave
> and related but that can evolve as we go.
>
> Peter
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:09 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jared,
> > Sorry for this taking so long. I finally got some time to work on the
> > gateway rpm. Though really, I need a second opinion to see if I
> > should proceed with what I've done or try something else.
> >
> > As discussed a while ago, I have tried my hand at bundling the gateway
> > nodejs dependencies. The biggest problem with that was there was
> > several binary packages that it wanted. In the end, I bundled
> > everything but those packages, and those packages I created links in
> > the bundle. So the package depends on those binary nodejs packages,
> > but everything else is bundled.
> >
> > I'm attaching my spec file, along with the gateway-tarball.sh that
> > does the bundling.
> >
> > Could you let me know what you think?
> >
> > I'm totally open to being completely wrong. This is the first time
> > I've done a nodejs bundling.
> >
> > Troy
> > p.s. I figured I'd cc the rest of the iot mailling list incase anyone
> > else on here has any ideas.
8:02 p.m.
Both of those are very good points.
Name: I like what you proposed mozilla-iot-gateway ... The only issue
I have with it is the "mozilla" point. I'm worried that people will
think it's a browser plugin, or something like that. I went to their
webpage [1] and they are calling it "Things Gateway" ... because it is
part of "Project Things". So how about
project-things-gateway or maybe just things-gateway
I don't think mozilla as a name is a problem here in the gateway
context, but I do like the things context, so I think
mozilla-things-gateway is a reasonable name.
Supported Stacks: Here's an interesting tidbit. When you
install
things-gateway (that's what I'm going to call it in this email) you
really only get the gateway, no supporting stacks.
You can run the gateway, and it will *look* like and act like
everything is installed. You can click on LIFX or TP-Link, and the
web interface will say that they are loaded and all that. But then
you won't be able to see or work with any of those things. You might
think maybe you have a firewall issue, or something like that.
But if you look at your server logs, it's spitting out (over and over
again) errors saying that it can't find those modules.
If you look at the mozilla-iot github area,[2] you'll see all of those
stacks, each in their own github repo. Several aren't even nodejs.
The takeaway is that we need to package each of those things as their
own gateway module, named something like
things-gateway-zigbee
things-gateway-tplink
That is one of the bugs/issues that I want to file with them.
But it looks like version 7.0 is close to being released, so I'm going
to wait until that is released before I file any more bugs.
OK, I think we can work with mozilla on this.
Peter
> Troy
>
> [1] - https://mozilla-iot.github.io/
> [2] - https://github.com/mozilla-iot
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:04 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Troy,
> >
> > I don't have the knowledge about the nodejs side of things but a few
> > other notes.
> >
> > Overall I think we should call the package something more descriptive
> > such as mozilla-iot-gateway as gateway could mean a number of things.
> >
> > In terms of dependencies I suspect we'll likely need some more around
> > other deps, and likely some optional supported stacks like openzwave
> > and related but that can evolve as we go.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:09 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jared,
> > > Sorry for this taking so long. I finally got some time to work on the
> > > gateway rpm. Though really, I need a second opinion to see if I
> > > should proceed with what I've done or try something else.
> > >
> > > As discussed a while ago, I have tried my hand at bundling the gateway
> > > nodejs dependencies. The biggest problem with that was there was
> > > several binary packages that it wanted. In the end, I bundled
> > > everything but those packages, and those packages I created links in
> > > the bundle. So the package depends on those binary nodejs packages,
> > > but everything else is bundled.
> > >
> > > I'm attaching my spec file, along with the gateway-tarball.sh that
> > > does the bundling.
> > >
> > > Could you let me know what you think?
> > >
> > > I'm totally open to being completely wrong. This is the first time
> > > I've done a nodejs bundling.
> > >
> > > Troy
> > > p.s. I figured I'd cc the rest of the iot mailling list incase anyone
> > > else on here has any ideas.
> _______________________________________________
> IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
9:05 a.m.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 6:02 PM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Both of those are very good points.
>
> Name: I like what you proposed mozilla-iot-gateway ... The only issue
> I have with it is the "mozilla" point. I'm worried that people will
> think it's a browser plugin, or something like that. I went to their
> webpage [1] and they are calling it "Things Gateway" ... because it is
> part of "Project Things". So how about
> project-things-gateway or maybe just things-gateway
I don't think mozilla as a name is a problem here in the gateway
context, but I do like the things context, so I think
mozilla-things-gateway is a reasonable name.
> Supported Stacks: Here's an interesting tidbit. When you install
> things-gateway (that's what I'm going to call it in this email) you
> really only get the gateway, no supporting stacks.
> You can run the gateway, and it will *look* like and act like
> everything is installed. You can click on LIFX or TP-Link, and the
> web interface will say that they are loaded and all that. But then
> you won't be able to see or work with any of those things. You might
> think maybe you have a firewall issue, or something like that.
> But if you look at your server logs, it's spitting out (over and over
> again) errors saying that it can't find those modules.
> If you look at the mozilla-iot github area,[2] you'll see all of those
> stacks, each in their own github repo. Several aren't even nodejs.
> The takeaway is that we need to package each of those things as their
> own gateway module, named something like
> things-gateway-zigbee
> things-gateway-tplink
> That is one of the bugs/issues that I want to file with them.
> But it looks like version 7.0 is close to being released, so I'm going
> to wait until that is released before I file any more bugs.
OK, I think we can work with mozilla on this.
gateway 0.7 is released. [3]
I'm going to play with that some and start filing issues on things I see.
Troy
[3] - https://github.com/mozilla-iot/gateway/releases
> > [1] - https://mozilla-iot.github.io/
> > [2] - https://github.com/mozilla-iot
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:04 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Troy,
> > >
> > > I don't have the knowledge about the nodejs side of things but a few
> > > other notes.
> > >
> > > Overall I think we should call the package something more descriptive
> > > such as mozilla-iot-gateway as gateway could mean a number of things.
> > >
> > > In terms of dependencies I suspect we'll likely need some more around
> > > other deps, and likely some optional supported stacks like openzwave
> > > and related but that can evolve as we go.
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:09 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jared,
> > > > Sorry for this taking so long. I finally got some time to work on
the
> > > > gateway rpm. Though really, I need a second opinion to see if I
> > > > should proceed with what I've done or try something else.
> > > >
> > > > As discussed a while ago, I have tried my hand at bundling the
gateway
> > > > nodejs dependencies. The biggest problem with that was there was
> > > > several binary packages that it wanted. In the end, I bundled
> > > > everything but those packages, and those packages I created links in
> > > > the bundle. So the package depends on those binary nodejs packages,
> > > > but everything else is bundled.
> > > >
> > > > I'm attaching my spec file, along with the gateway-tarball.sh
that
> > > > does the bundling.
> > > >
> > > > Could you let me know what you think?
> > > >
> > > > I'm totally open to being completely wrong. This is the first
time
> > > > I've done a nodejs bundling.
> > > >
> > > > Troy
> > > > p.s. I figured I'd cc the rest of the iot mailling list incase
anyone
> > > > else on here has any ideas.
> > _______________________________________________
> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
8:07 a.m.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 5:09 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Jared,
Sorry for this taking so long. I finally got some time to work on the
gateway rpm. Though really, I need a second opinion to see if I
should proceed with what I've done or try something else.
No worries on it taking a while -- I was on vacation all last week, and am
swamped with ${DAYJOB} work now that I'm back. That being said, here are a
few comments on the spec file as I see it.
1. Trying to build the package from this file (rpmbuild -ba gateway.spec)
fails. In particular, it's failing because several of the things you're
copying in line 37 of your spec file don't seem to come from the tarball
when it's unpackaged in line 28. Also, there are lots of those things that
we wouldn't necessarily want to include in our package, such as the
.gitignore file for the .travis.yml file, just to name a couple of examples.
2. The "license" field is wrong, for a couple of reasons. One, you should
use the abbreviation "MPLv2.0" as listed at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Software_License_List.
Second, because you're bundling all of the dependencies, the license on
this package needs to reflect the licenses of *everything* that's bundled
with the package. Yes, that means doing a license audit of everything
that's being bundled. And yes, that's a lot of work.
3. Nothing seems to be showing that the dependencies are bundled. At a
minimum, I would expect a long list of lines that look something like:
"Provides: bundled(nodejs-abab)=1.0.4", "Provides:
bundled(nodejs-abbrev)=1.1.1", etc. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Software_policy for the bundled
software policy itself.
4. I would assume that at least *some* of the necessary dependencies are
already in Fedora -- if so, we should use those if possible instead of
using the bundled versions, and if there's a reason we can't use the system
version, we should document it in the spec file.
I'll try to do a more thorough review of the spec file later this week.
Also, I'm all for renaming this to "things-gateway" or
"moz-iot-gateway" or
something more descriptive than just "gateway".
--
Jared Smith
8:49 a.m.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:07 AM Jared K. Smith <jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 5:09 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jared,
> Sorry for this taking so long. I finally got some time to work on the
> gateway rpm. Though really, I need a second opinion to see if I
> should proceed with what I've done or try something else.
No worries on it taking a while -- I was on vacation all last week, and am swamped with
${DAYJOB} work now that I'm back. That being said, here are a few comments on the
spec file as I see it.
1. Trying to build the package from this file (rpmbuild -ba gateway.spec) fails. In
particular, it's failing because several of the things you're copying in line 37
of your spec file don't seem to come from the tarball when it's unpackaged in line
28. Also, there are lots of those things that we wouldn't necessarily want to include
in our package, such as the .gitignore file for the .travis.yml file, just to name a
couple of examples.
Ya, I initially just had what I considered the minimum set of things
we wanted in the package, and that kept failling, after about the 5th
"oh it really does need this .xxx file" I just threw everything in.
I haven't built this in a mock area yet
2. The "license" field is wrong, for a couple of reasons.
One, you should use the abbreviation "MPLv2.0" as listed at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Software_License_List. Second, because
you're bundling all of the dependencies, the license on this package needs to reflect
the licenses of *everything* that's bundled with the package. Yes, that means doing a
license audit of everything that's being bundled. And yes, that's a lot of work.
That's going to be a pain, but it's still better than having to create
a package for each of those (where I'd have to find the license
anyway) so ... ok.
3. Nothing seems to be showing that the dependencies are bundled.
At a minimum, I would expect a long list of lines that look something like:
"Provides: bundled(nodejs-abab)=1.0.4", "Provides:
bundled(nodejs-abbrev)=1.1.1", etc. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Software_policy for the bundled software policy
itself.
Yep, I'm still working on getting this working, and pulling things out.
I'll do that step at the end.
But thank you for the link.
4. I would assume that at least *some* of the necessary dependencies
are already in Fedora -- if so, we should use those if possible instead of using the
bundled versions, and if there's a reason we can't use the system version, we
should document it in the spec file.
I can try to find more, the one's I have listed in the Requires are
the "binary" packages.
I'll try to do a more thorough review of the spec file later this
week.
Also, I'm all for renaming this to "things-gateway" or
"moz-iot-gateway" or something more descriptive than just "gateway".
--
Jared Smith
So, I updated to version 0.7.0, and among other things, the output to
the console when it's run is much lower. So I have been able to track
down several of what I was considering bugs.
- We will need to also package gateway-addon-python and gateway-addon-node
-- I just want to let that be known as we talk about the right name
for this. If we make the initial gateway name too long and we have to
tack on two more names for it's packages, then the names are going to
be huge.
-- The good news is this is the reason I thought we had to package all
of the sensors it knows about seperately. It was really failing
because it didn't have the correct add-on.
--- When you click on an addon, if it doesn't already have it, it
downloads that addon.
--- Before there were so many other outputs I missed that it was
successfully downloading those addon's, but then failling because they
were python or nodejs based, and I didn't have the translator for
those languages installed.
- We will also need to package nanomsg and nodejs-nanomsg
For names, I'm still torn between "things-gateway" and
"mozilla-iot-gateway". I'm leaning towards "things-gateway"
because
maybe in the future this might be completely seperate from mozilla.
But, other than that, mozilla-iot-gateway is much more descriptive.
Troy
4:56 p.m.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:49 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:07 AM Jared K. Smith <jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> 3. Nothing seems to be showing that the dependencies are bundled. At a minimum, I
would expect a long list of lines that look something like: "Provides:
bundled(nodejs-abab)=1.0.4", "Provides: bundled(nodejs-abbrev)=1.1.1", etc.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Software_policy for the bundled software
policy itself.
>
Yep, I'm still working on getting this working, and pulling things out.
I'll do that step at the end.
But thank you for the link.
> 4. I would assume that at least *some* of the necessary dependencies are already in
Fedora -- if so, we should use those if possible instead of using the bundled versions,
and if there's a reason we can't use the system version, we should document it in
the spec file.
>
I can try to find more, the one's I have listed in the Requires are
the "binary" packages.
Here's a fun fact.
gateway depends on 1000 node_modules (exactly I believe)
I was able to unbundle 455 of those packages. Ya!!
Of course, that means that I have to have 455 lines of "Requires:" and
545 lines of "Provides: bundled()" in the spec file
Ya!!??
This spec file just went from a lightweight to a sumo wrestler in one day.
Troy
3:39 p.m.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Here's a fun fact.
gateway depends on 1000 node_modules (exactly I believe)
I was able to unbundle 455 of those packages. Ya!!
Of course, that means that I have to have 455 lines of "Requires:" and
545 lines of "Provides: bundled()" in the spec file
Ya!!??
This spec file just went from a lightweight to a sumo wrestler in one day.
That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately. I know the NodeJS SIG was working on
a macro to automagically create the "Provides: bundled()" lines, but I
really don't know if they ever got it working.
-Jared
5:17 p.m.
Next release of "gateway" is up, along with a corresponding updated
nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M and built rpm[2] by 20M. Ya!!
The spec file [3] has an updated license list with all the licenses
from the bundled modules. Oddly enough, I didn't find a single GPL,
though there was one LGPL.
It also has all the unbundled packages now as Requires, and all the
bundled packages as Provides: bundled(). Thus making the spec file
rather long.
I also went through and trimmed out all the cruft that didn't need to
be installed for gateway to run (.travis.yml, .babelrc, and others)
I also added how to run it as a regular user in the %description area.
That's probrubly not the best place to put that, but I figured it's a
place a user can always see.
The script[4] to download, setup, trim and tar up the source with it's
dependencies has been updated to use an external file, that is a list
of all the nodejs modules to pull out of the bundled dependencies. It
also now goes as deep as it needs to in order to pull out all those
modules.
And there is the list of modules we are unbundeling.[5]
Here is where everything is. [6]
These have been tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and x86_64.
I haven't decided between things-gateway and mozilla-iot-gateway.
Both have good reasons to be the right name. Honestly, I might just
flip a coin and let that decide.
If anyone has a strong preference for one or the other, let me know.
Troy
[1] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
[2] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
[3] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
[4] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
[5] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
[6] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith <jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here's a fun fact.
>> gateway depends on 1000 node_modules (exactly I believe)
>> I was able to unbundle 455 of those packages. Ya!!
>> Of course, that means that I have to have 455 lines of "Requires:" and
>> 545 lines of "Provides: bundled()" in the spec file
>> Ya!!??
>> This spec file just went from a lightweight to a sumo wrestler in one day.
>
>
> That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately. I know the NodeJS SIG was working on a
macro to automagically create the "Provides: bundled()" lines, but I really
don't know if they ever got it working.
>
> -Jared
5:50 p.m.
I knew I shouldn't have hit 'send'.
Always test on a clean machine.
A few more tweeks are needed.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:17 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Next release of "gateway" is up, along with a corresponding updated
> nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
> The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M and built rpm[2] by 20M. Ya!!
> The spec file [3] has an updated license list with all the licenses
> from the bundled modules. Oddly enough, I didn't find a single GPL,
> though there was one LGPL.
> It also has all the unbundled packages now as Requires, and all the
> bundled packages as Provides: bundled(). Thus making the spec file
> rather long.
> I also went through and trimmed out all the cruft that didn't need to
> be installed for gateway to run (.travis.yml, .babelrc, and others)
> I also added how to run it as a regular user in the %description area.
> That's probrubly not the best place to put that, but I figured it's a
> place a user can always see.
> The script[4] to download, setup, trim and tar up the source with it's
> dependencies has been updated to use an external file, that is a list
> of all the nodejs modules to pull out of the bundled dependencies. It
> also now goes as deep as it needs to in order to pull out all those
> modules.
> And there is the list of modules we are unbundeling.[5]
> Here is where everything is. [6]
>
> These have been tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and x86_64.
>
> I haven't decided between things-gateway and mozilla-iot-gateway.
> Both have good reasons to be the right name. Honestly, I might just
> flip a coin and let that decide.
> If anyone has a strong preference for one or the other, let me know.
>
> Troy
>
> [1] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> [2] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> [3] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> [4] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> [5] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> [6] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith <jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Here's a fun fact.
> >> gateway depends on 1000 node_modules (exactly I believe)
> >> I was able to unbundle 455 of those packages. Ya!!
> >> Of course, that means that I have to have 455 lines of "Requires:"
and
> >> 545 lines of "Provides: bundled()" in the spec file
> >> Ya!!??
> >> This spec file just went from a lightweight to a sumo wrestler in one day.
> >
> >
> > That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately. I know the NodeJS SIG was working on
a macro to automagically create the "Provides: bundled()" lines, but I really
don't know if they ever got it working.
> >
> > -Jared
8:09 a.m.
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
Next release of "gateway" is up, along with a corresponding
updated
nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M and built rpm[2] by
20M. Ya!!
The spec file [3] has an updated license list with all the licenses
from the bundled modules. Oddly enough, I didn't find a single GPL,
though there was one LGPL.
It also has all the unbundled packages now as Requires, and all the
bundled packages as Provides: bundled(). Thus making the spec file
rather long.
I also went through and trimmed out all the cruft that didn't need to
be installed for gateway to run (.travis.yml, .babelrc, and others)
I also added how to run it as a regular user in the %description
area.
That's probrubly not the best place to put that, but I figured it's a
place a user can always see.
The script[4] to download, setup, trim and tar up the source with
it's
dependencies has been updated to use an external file, that is a list
of all the nodejs modules to pull out of the bundled
dependencies. It
also now goes as deep as it needs to in order to pull out all those
modules.
And there is the list of modules we are unbundeling.[5]
Here is where everything is. [6]
These have been tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and x86_64.
I haven't decided between things-gateway and mozilla-iot-gateway.
Have you
considered mozillathings-iot-gateway?
Both have good reasons to be the right name. Honestly, I might just
flip a coin and let that decide.
If anyone has a strong preference for one or the other, let me know.
Troy
[1] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
[2] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
[3] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
[4] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
[5] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
[6] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith <
jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > Here's a fun fact.
> > gateway depends on 1000 node_modules (exactly I believe)
> > I was able to unbundle 455 of those packages. Ya!!
> > Of course, that means that I have to have 455 lines of
> > "Requires:" and
> > 545 lines of "Provides: bundled()" in the spec file
> > Ya!!??
> > This spec file just went from a lightweight to a sumo wrestler in
> > one day.
>
> That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately. I know the NodeJS SIG was
> working on a macro to automagically create the "Provides:
> bundled()" lines, but I really don't know if they ever got it
> working.
>
> -Jared
_______________________________________________
IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
5:06 p.m.
Two things:
1 - I'm calling the package mozilla-iot-gateway
-- The reason for my final decision is that everything gets saved in
~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen anything in it's documentation
refering to it as things-gateway, other than that one webpage.
2 - As much as I liked removing the modules for over 400 modules, I
just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot of our nodejs modules are very
old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs 3.6, things like that. I'm
going back to my original design of only unbundling the binary (arch
dependent) modules.
I should have a workable package tomorrow.
Troy
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell Doty <rdoty(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > Next release of "gateway" is up, along with a corresponding updated
> > nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
> > The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M and built rpm[2] by
> > 20M. Ya!!
> > The spec file [3] has an updated license list with all the licenses
> > from the bundled modules. Oddly enough, I didn't find a single GPL,
> > though there was one LGPL.
> > It also has all the unbundled packages now as Requires, and all the
> > bundled packages as Provides: bundled(). Thus making the spec file
> > rather long.
> > I also went through and trimmed out all the cruft that didn't need to
> > be installed for gateway to run (.travis.yml, .babelrc, and others)
> > I also added how to run it as a regular user in the %description
> > area.
> > That's probrubly not the best place to put that, but I figured it's a
> > place a user can always see.
> > The script[4] to download, setup, trim and tar up the source with
> > it's
> > dependencies has been updated to use an external file, that is a list
> > of all the nodejs modules to pull out of the bundled
> > dependencies. It
> > also now goes as deep as it needs to in order to pull out all those
> > modules.
> > And there is the list of modules we are unbundeling.[5]
> > Here is where everything is. [6]
> >
> > These have been tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and x86_64.
> >
> > I haven't decided between things-gateway and mozilla-iot-gateway.
> Have you considered mozillathings-iot-gateway?
>
> > Both have good reasons to be the right name. Honestly, I might just
> > flip a coin and let that decide.
> > If anyone has a strong preference for one or the other, let me know.
> >
> > Troy
> >
> > [1] -
> > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> > [2] -
> > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> > [3] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> > [4] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > [5] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > [6] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith <
> > jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Here's a fun fact.
> > > > gateway depends on 1000 node_modules (exactly I believe)
> > > > I was able to unbundle 455 of those packages. Ya!!
> > > > Of course, that means that I have to have 455 lines of
> > > > "Requires:" and
> > > > 545 lines of "Provides: bundled()" in the spec file
> > > > Ya!!??
> > > > This spec file just went from a lightweight to a sumo wrestler in
> > > > one day.
> > >
> > > That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately. I know the NodeJS SIG was
> > > working on a macro to automagically create the "Provides:
> > > bundled()" lines, but I really don't know if they ever got it
> > > working.
> > >
> > > -Jared
> > _______________________________________________
> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
12:24 p.m.
I believe I have this working now.
I've tried it on a couple of x86_64 machines and it works great.
I'm having some problems installing in on aarch64 (raspberry pi 3)
machines. But I'm pretty sure it will work.
Here is the packages, spec files, and supporting scripts.
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
Troy
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Two things:
> 1 - I'm calling the package mozilla-iot-gateway
> -- The reason for my final decision is that everything gets saved in
> ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen anything in it's documentation
> refering to it as things-gateway, other than that one webpage.
>
> 2 - As much as I liked removing the modules for over 400 modules, I
> just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot of our nodejs modules are very
> old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs 3.6, things like that. I'm
> going back to my original design of only unbundling the binary (arch
> dependent) modules.
>
> I should have a workable package tomorrow.
>
> Troy
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell Doty <rdoty(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > Next release of "gateway" is up, along with a corresponding
updated
> > > nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
> > > The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M and built rpm[2] by
> > > 20M. Ya!!
> > > The spec file [3] has an updated license list with all the licenses
> > > from the bundled modules. Oddly enough, I didn't find a single GPL,
> > > though there was one LGPL.
> > > It also has all the unbundled packages now as Requires, and all the
> > > bundled packages as Provides: bundled(). Thus making the spec file
> > > rather long.
> > > I also went through and trimmed out all the cruft that didn't need to
> > > be installed for gateway to run (.travis.yml, .babelrc, and others)
> > > I also added how to run it as a regular user in the %description
> > > area.
> > > That's probrubly not the best place to put that, but I figured it's
a
> > > place a user can always see.
> > > The script[4] to download, setup, trim and tar up the source with
> > > it's
> > > dependencies has been updated to use an external file, that is a list
> > > of all the nodejs modules to pull out of the bundled
> > > dependencies. It
> > > also now goes as deep as it needs to in order to pull out all those
> > > modules.
> > > And there is the list of modules we are unbundeling.[5]
> > > Here is where everything is. [6]
> > >
> > > These have been tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and x86_64.
> > >
> > > I haven't decided between things-gateway and mozilla-iot-gateway.
> > Have you considered mozillathings-iot-gateway?
> >
> > > Both have good reasons to be the right name. Honestly, I might just
> > > flip a coin and let that decide.
> > > If anyone has a strong preference for one or the other, let me know.
> > >
> > > Troy
> > >
> > > [1] -
> > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> > > [2] -
> > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> > > [3] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> > > [4] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > [5] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > [6] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith <
> > > jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Here's a fun fact.
> > > > > gateway depends on 1000 node_modules (exactly I believe)
> > > > > I was able to unbundle 455 of those packages. Ya!!
> > > > > Of course, that means that I have to have 455 lines of
> > > > > "Requires:" and
> > > > > 545 lines of "Provides: bundled()" in the spec file
> > > > > Ya!!??
> > > > > This spec file just went from a lightweight to a sumo wrestler
in
> > > > > one day.
> > > >
> > > > That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately. I know the NodeJS SIG was
> > > > working on a macro to automagically create the "Provides:
> > > > bundled()" lines, but I really don't know if they ever got
it
> > > > working.
> > > >
> > > > -Jared
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > List Guidelines:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
4:20 p.m.
For those who were wondering.
Now that I'm able to install rpm-ostree packages ... this works on
aarch64 machines too.
Ya!!
Please give a look. Especially the spec files. If they look good
I'll work on getting them into Fedora, hopefully in time for F30
freeze.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I believe I have this working now.
> I've tried it on a couple of x86_64 machines and it works great.
> I'm having some problems installing in on aarch64 (raspberry pi 3)
> machines. But I'm pretty sure it will work.
>
> Here is the packages, spec files, and supporting scripts.
> https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
> https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
> https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
> https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
> https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
>
> Troy
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Two things:
> > 1 - I'm calling the package mozilla-iot-gateway
> > -- The reason for my final decision is that everything gets saved in
> > ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen anything in it's documentation
> > refering to it as things-gateway, other than that one webpage.
> >
> > 2 - As much as I liked removing the modules for over 400 modules, I
> > just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot of our nodejs modules are very
> > old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs 3.6, things like that. I'm
> > going back to my original design of only unbundling the binary (arch
> > dependent) modules.
> >
> > I should have a workable package tomorrow.
> >
> > Troy
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell Doty <rdoty(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > > Next release of "gateway" is up, along with a corresponding
updated
> > > > nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
> > > > The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M and built rpm[2] by
> > > > 20M. Ya!!
> > > > The spec file [3] has an updated license list with all the licenses
> > > > from the bundled modules. Oddly enough, I didn't find a single
GPL,
> > > > though there was one LGPL.
> > > > It also has all the unbundled packages now as Requires, and all the
> > > > bundled packages as Provides: bundled(). Thus making the spec file
> > > > rather long.
> > > > I also went through and trimmed out all the cruft that didn't need
to
> > > > be installed for gateway to run (.travis.yml, .babelrc, and others)
> > > > I also added how to run it as a regular user in the %description
> > > > area.
> > > > That's probrubly not the best place to put that, but I figured
it's a
> > > > place a user can always see.
> > > > The script[4] to download, setup, trim and tar up the source with
> > > > it's
> > > > dependencies has been updated to use an external file, that is a list
> > > > of all the nodejs modules to pull out of the bundled
> > > > dependencies. It
> > > > also now goes as deep as it needs to in order to pull out all those
> > > > modules.
> > > > And there is the list of modules we are unbundeling.[5]
> > > > Here is where everything is. [6]
> > > >
> > > > These have been tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and x86_64.
> > > >
> > > > I haven't decided between things-gateway and mozilla-iot-gateway.
> > > Have you considered mozillathings-iot-gateway?
> > >
> > > > Both have good reasons to be the right name. Honestly, I might just
> > > > flip a coin and let that decide.
> > > > If anyone has a strong preference for one or the other, let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Troy
> > > >
> > > > [1] -
> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> > > > [2] -
> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> > > > [3] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> > > > [4] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > > [5] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > > [6] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith <
> > > > jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Here's a fun fact.
> > > > > > gateway depends on 1000 node_modules (exactly I believe)
> > > > > > I was able to unbundle 455 of those packages. Ya!!
> > > > > > Of course, that means that I have to have 455 lines of
> > > > > > "Requires:" and
> > > > > > 545 lines of "Provides: bundled()" in the spec
file
> > > > > > Ya!!??
> > > > > > This spec file just went from a lightweight to a sumo
wrestler in
> > > > > > one day.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately. I know the NodeJS SIG
was
> > > > > working on a macro to automagically create the "Provides:
> > > > > bundled()" lines, but I really don't know if they ever
got it
> > > > > working.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Jared
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > List Guidelines:
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > List Archives:
> > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
7:25 a.m.
Please give a look. Especially the spec files. If they look good
I will do in in the next few days.
I'll work on getting them into Fedora, hopefully in time for F30
freeze.
I would much sooner if we could aim for much sooner than that to
enable wider testing by interested parties. It's going to take time to
do things like license review so the sooner we can get the spec up for
review it will start to enable these things more formally. I don't
expect the first version that lands in the repos proper to be perfect
but it does enable easier testing by a wider audience and release
early release often etc.
While obviously there's still work to be done I think it's in good
enough shape to get the package review submitted and in motion.
Peter
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I have this working now.
> > I've tried it on a couple of x86_64 machines and it works great.
> > I'm having some problems installing in on aarch64 (raspberry pi 3)
> > machines. But I'm pretty sure it will work.
> >
> > Here is the packages, spec files, and supporting scripts.
> >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
> > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
> > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
> > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
> > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
> >
> > Troy
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Two things:
> > > 1 - I'm calling the package mozilla-iot-gateway
> > > -- The reason for my final decision is that everything gets saved in
> > > ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen anything in it's documentation
> > > refering to it as things-gateway, other than that one webpage.
> > >
> > > 2 - As much as I liked removing the modules for over 400 modules, I
> > > just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot of our nodejs modules are very
> > > old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs 3.6, things like that. I'm
> > > going back to my original design of only unbundling the binary (arch
> > > dependent) modules.
> > >
> > > I should have a workable package tomorrow.
> > >
> > > Troy
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell Doty <rdoty(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > > > Next release of "gateway" is up, along with a
corresponding updated
> > > > > nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
> > > > > The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M and built rpm[2] by
> > > > > 20M. Ya!!
> > > > > The spec file [3] has an updated license list with all the
licenses
> > > > > from the bundled modules. Oddly enough, I didn't find a
single GPL,
> > > > > though there was one LGPL.
> > > > > It also has all the unbundled packages now as Requires, and all
the
> > > > > bundled packages as Provides: bundled(). Thus making the spec
file
> > > > > rather long.
> > > > > I also went through and trimmed out all the cruft that didn't
need to
> > > > > be installed for gateway to run (.travis.yml, .babelrc, and
others)
> > > > > I also added how to run it as a regular user in the %description
> > > > > area.
> > > > > That's probrubly not the best place to put that, but I
figured it's a
> > > > > place a user can always see.
> > > > > The script[4] to download, setup, trim and tar up the source
with
> > > > > it's
> > > > > dependencies has been updated to use an external file, that is a
list
> > > > > of all the nodejs modules to pull out of the bundled
> > > > > dependencies. It
> > > > > also now goes as deep as it needs to in order to pull out all
those
> > > > > modules.
> > > > > And there is the list of modules we are unbundeling.[5]
> > > > > Here is where everything is. [6]
> > > > >
> > > > > These have been tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and x86_64.
> > > > >
> > > > > I haven't decided between things-gateway and
mozilla-iot-gateway.
> > > > Have you considered mozillathings-iot-gateway?
> > > >
> > > > > Both have good reasons to be the right name. Honestly, I might
just
> > > > > flip a coin and let that decide.
> > > > > If anyone has a strong preference for one or the other, let me
know.
> > > > >
> > > > > Troy
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] -
> > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> > > > > [2] -
> > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> > > > > [3] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> > > > > [4] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > > > [5] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > > > [6] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith <
> > > > > jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Here's a fun fact.
> > > > > > > gateway depends on 1000 node_modules (exactly I
believe)
> > > > > > > I was able to unbundle 455 of those packages. Ya!!
> > > > > > > Of course, that means that I have to have 455 lines of
> > > > > > > "Requires:" and
> > > > > > > 545 lines of "Provides: bundled()" in the
spec file
> > > > > > > Ya!!??
> > > > > > > This spec file just went from a lightweight to a sumo
wrestler in
> > > > > > > one day.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately. I know the NodeJS
SIG was
> > > > > > working on a macro to automagically create the
"Provides:
> > > > > > bundled()" lines, but I really don't know if they
ever got it
> > > > > > working.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Jared
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > List Guidelines:
> > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > List Archives:
> > > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
12:14 p.m.
Fedora Review Requests:
* mozilla-iot-gateway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125
* nodejs-nanomsg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673126
Jared, if you could grab those two, I'd appreciate it.
Since the gateway package has bundling, I'd appreciate someone who
knows about bundling working on it.
nodejs-nanomsg is just the standard binary nodejs package. But it's
needed so that mozilla-iot-gateway can remain noarch.
Troy
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:25 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Please give a look. Especially the spec files. If they look good
>
> I will do in in the next few days.
>
> > I'll work on getting them into Fedora, hopefully in time for F30
> > freeze.
>
> I would much sooner if we could aim for much sooner than that to
> enable wider testing by interested parties. It's going to take time to
> do things like license review so the sooner we can get the spec up for
> review it will start to enable these things more formally. I don't
> expect the first version that lands in the repos proper to be perfect
> but it does enable easier testing by a wider audience and release
> early release often etc.
>
> While obviously there's still work to be done I think it's in good
> enough shape to get the package review submitted and in motion.
>
> Peter
>
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I believe I have this working now.
> > > I've tried it on a couple of x86_64 machines and it works great.
> > > I'm having some problems installing in on aarch64 (raspberry pi 3)
> > > machines. But I'm pretty sure it will work.
> > >
> > > Here is the packages, spec files, and supporting scripts.
> > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
> > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
> > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
> > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
> > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
> > >
> > > Troy
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Two things:
> > > > 1 - I'm calling the package mozilla-iot-gateway
> > > > -- The reason for my final decision is that everything gets saved in
> > > > ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen anything in it's
documentation
> > > > refering to it as things-gateway, other than that one webpage.
> > > >
> > > > 2 - As much as I liked removing the modules for over 400 modules, I
> > > > just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot of our nodejs modules are
very
> > > > old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs 3.6, things like that. I'm
> > > > going back to my original design of only unbundling the binary (arch
> > > > dependent) modules.
> > > >
> > > > I should have a workable package tomorrow.
> > > >
> > > > Troy
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell Doty <rdoty(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > > > > Next release of "gateway" is up, along with a
corresponding updated
> > > > > > nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
> > > > > > The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M and built rpm[2]
by
> > > > > > 20M. Ya!!
> > > > > > The spec file [3] has an updated license list with all the
licenses
> > > > > > from the bundled modules. Oddly enough, I didn't find a
single GPL,
> > > > > > though there was one LGPL.
> > > > > > It also has all the unbundled packages now as Requires, and
all the
> > > > > > bundled packages as Provides: bundled(). Thus making the
spec file
> > > > > > rather long.
> > > > > > I also went through and trimmed out all the cruft that
didn't need to
> > > > > > be installed for gateway to run (.travis.yml, .babelrc, and
others)
> > > > > > I also added how to run it as a regular user in the
%description
> > > > > > area.
> > > > > > That's probrubly not the best place to put that, but I
figured it's a
> > > > > > place a user can always see.
> > > > > > The script[4] to download, setup, trim and tar up the source
with
> > > > > > it's
> > > > > > dependencies has been updated to use an external file, that
is a list
> > > > > > of all the nodejs modules to pull out of the bundled
> > > > > > dependencies. It
> > > > > > also now goes as deep as it needs to in order to pull out
all those
> > > > > > modules.
> > > > > > And there is the list of modules we are unbundeling.[5]
> > > > > > Here is where everything is. [6]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > These have been tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and x86_64.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I haven't decided between things-gateway and
mozilla-iot-gateway.
> > > > > Have you considered mozillathings-iot-gateway?
> > > > >
> > > > > > Both have good reasons to be the right name. Honestly, I
might just
> > > > > > flip a coin and let that decide.
> > > > > > If anyone has a strong preference for one or the other, let
me know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Troy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] -
> > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> > > > > > [2] -
> > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> > > > > > [3] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> > > > > > [4] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > > > > [5] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > > > > [6] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith <
> > > > > > jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Here's a fun fact.
> > > > > > > > gateway depends on 1000 node_modules (exactly I
believe)
> > > > > > > > I was able to unbundle 455 of those packages.
Ya!!
> > > > > > > > Of course, that means that I have to have 455
lines of
> > > > > > > > "Requires:" and
> > > > > > > > 545 lines of "Provides: bundled()" in
the spec file
> > > > > > > > Ya!!??
> > > > > > > > This spec file just went from a lightweight to a
sumo wrestler in
> > > > > > > > one day.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately. I know the
NodeJS SIG was
> > > > > > > working on a macro to automagically create the
"Provides:
> > > > > > > bundled()" lines, but I really don't know if
they ever got it
> > > > > > > working.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Jared
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > > List Guidelines:
> > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > > List Archives:
> > > > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 p.m.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 6:55 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Fedora Review Requests:
* mozilla-iot-gateway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125
* nodejs-nanomsg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673126
Jared, if you could grab those two, I'd appreciate it.
Since the gateway package has bundling, I'd appreciate someone who
knows about bundling working on it.
nodejs-nanomsg is just the standard binary nodejs package. But it's
needed so that mozilla-iot-gateway can remain noarch.
I took the liberty to assign them to Jared and add them to the IoT tracker :)
> Troy
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:25 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Please give a look. Especially the spec files. If they look good
> >
> > I will do in in the next few days.
> >
> > > I'll work on getting them into Fedora, hopefully in time for F30
> > > freeze.
> >
> > I would much sooner if we could aim for much sooner than that to
> > enable wider testing by interested parties. It's going to take time to
> > do things like license review so the sooner we can get the spec up for
> > review it will start to enable these things more formally. I don't
> > expect the first version that lands in the repos proper to be perfect
> > but it does enable easier testing by a wider audience and release
> > early release often etc.
> >
> > While obviously there's still work to be done I think it's in good
> > enough shape to get the package review submitted and in motion.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I believe I have this working now.
> > > > I've tried it on a couple of x86_64 machines and it works great.
> > > > I'm having some problems installing in on aarch64 (raspberry pi
3)
> > > > machines. But I'm pretty sure it will work.
> > > >
> > > > Here is the packages, spec files, and supporting scripts.
> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
> > > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
> > > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
> > > >
> > > > Troy
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Two things:
> > > > > 1 - I'm calling the package mozilla-iot-gateway
> > > > > -- The reason for my final decision is that everything gets saved
in
> > > > > ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen anything in it's
documentation
> > > > > refering to it as things-gateway, other than that one webpage.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2 - As much as I liked removing the modules for over 400 modules,
I
> > > > > just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot of our nodejs modules are
very
> > > > > old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs 3.6, things like that.
I'm
> > > > > going back to my original design of only unbundling the binary
(arch
> > > > > dependent) modules.
> > > > >
> > > > > I should have a workable package tomorrow.
> > > > >
> > > > > Troy
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell Doty
<rdoty(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > > > > > Next release of "gateway" is up, along with a
corresponding updated
> > > > > > > nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
> > > > > > > The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M and built
rpm[2] by
> > > > > > > 20M. Ya!!
> > > > > > > The spec file [3] has an updated license list with all
the licenses
> > > > > > > from the bundled modules. Oddly enough, I didn't
find a single GPL,
> > > > > > > though there was one LGPL.
> > > > > > > It also has all the unbundled packages now as Requires,
and all the
> > > > > > > bundled packages as Provides: bundled(). Thus making
the spec file
> > > > > > > rather long.
> > > > > > > I also went through and trimmed out all the cruft that
didn't need to
> > > > > > > be installed for gateway to run (.travis.yml, .babelrc,
and others)
> > > > > > > I also added how to run it as a regular user in the
%description
> > > > > > > area.
> > > > > > > That's probrubly not the best place to put that,
but I figured it's a
> > > > > > > place a user can always see.
> > > > > > > The script[4] to download, setup, trim and tar up the
source with
> > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > dependencies has been updated to use an external file,
that is a list
> > > > > > > of all the nodejs modules to pull out of the bundled
> > > > > > > dependencies. It
> > > > > > > also now goes as deep as it needs to in order to pull
out all those
> > > > > > > modules.
> > > > > > > And there is the list of modules we are
unbundeling.[5]
> > > > > > > Here is where everything is. [6]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > These have been tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and x86_64.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I haven't decided between things-gateway and
mozilla-iot-gateway.
> > > > > > Have you considered mozillathings-iot-gateway?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Both have good reasons to be the right name. Honestly,
I might just
> > > > > > > flip a coin and let that decide.
> > > > > > > If anyone has a strong preference for one or the other,
let me know.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Troy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] -
> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> > > > > > > [2] -
> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> > > > > > > [3] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> > > > > > > [4] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > > > > > [5] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > > > > > [6] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith <
> > > > > > > jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Here's a fun fact.
> > > > > > > > > gateway depends on 1000 node_modules (exactly
I believe)
> > > > > > > > > I was able to unbundle 455 of those packages.
Ya!!
> > > > > > > > > Of course, that means that I have to have 455
lines of
> > > > > > > > > "Requires:" and
> > > > > > > > > 545 lines of "Provides: bundled()"
in the spec file
> > > > > > > > > Ya!!??
> > > > > > > > > This spec file just went from a lightweight
to a sumo wrestler in
> > > > > > > > > one day.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately. I know
the NodeJS SIG was
> > > > > > > > working on a macro to automagically create the
"Provides:
> > > > > > > > bundled()" lines, but I really don't know
if they ever got it
> > > > > > > > working.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Jared
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > > > List Guidelines:
> > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > > > List Archives:
> > > > > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
12:42 p.m.
Thanks for doing the hard work of packaging this up... things are looking
pretty good. I'll continue to work on the package review in the Bugzilla
ticket.
One question I had was regarding the gateway software itself -- I think we
probably need some sort of systemd initscript to start and stop the
software, and some sort of instructions for people to get started.
Thoughts?
-Jared
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:14 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Fedora Review Requests:
* mozilla-iot-gateway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125
* nodejs-nanomsg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673126
Jared, if you could grab those two, I'd appreciate it.
Since the gateway package has bundling, I'd appreciate someone who
knows about bundling working on it.
nodejs-nanomsg is just the standard binary nodejs package. But it's
needed so that mozilla-iot-gateway can remain noarch.
Troy
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:25 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> > Please give a look. Especially the spec files. If they look good
>
> I will do in in the next few days.
>
> > I'll work on getting them into Fedora, hopefully in time for F30
> > freeze.
>
> I would much sooner if we could aim for much sooner than that to
> enable wider testing by interested parties. It's going to take time to
> do things like license review so the sooner we can get the spec up for
> review it will start to enable these things more formally. I don't
> expect the first version that lands in the repos proper to be perfect
> but it does enable easier testing by a wider audience and release
> early release often etc.
>
> While obviously there's still work to be done I think it's in good
> enough shape to get the package review submitted and in motion.
>
> Peter
>
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > > I believe I have this working now.
> > > I've tried it on a couple of x86_64 machines and it works great.
> > > I'm having some problems installing in on aarch64 (raspberry pi 3)
> > > machines. But I'm pretty sure it will work.
> > >
> > > Here is the packages, spec files, and supporting scripts.
> > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
> > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
> > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
> > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
> > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
> > >
> > > Troy
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Two things:
> > > > 1 - I'm calling the package mozilla-iot-gateway
> > > > -- The reason for my final decision is that everything gets saved
in
> > > > ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen anything in it's
documentation
> > > > refering to it as things-gateway, other than that one webpage.
> > > >
> > > > 2 - As much as I liked removing the modules for over 400 modules, I
> > > > just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot of our nodejs modules are
very
> > > > old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs 3.6, things like that.
I'm
> > > > going back to my original design of only unbundling the binary
(arch
> > > > dependent) modules.
> > > >
> > > > I should have a workable package tomorrow.
> > > >
> > > > Troy
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell Doty
<rdoty(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > > > > Next release of "gateway" is up, along with a
corresponding
updated
> > > > > > nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
> > > > > > The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M and built rpm[2]
by
> > > > > > 20M. Ya!!
> > > > > > The spec file [3] has an updated license list with all
the
licenses
> > > > > > from the bundled modules. Oddly enough, I didn't find
a
single GPL,
> > > > > > though there was one LGPL.
> > > > > > It also has all the unbundled packages now as Requires,
and
all the
> > > > > > bundled packages as Provides: bundled(). Thus making the
spec
file
> > > > > > rather long.
> > > > > > I also went through and trimmed out all the cruft that
didn't
need to
> > > > > > be installed for gateway to run (.travis.yml, .babelrc,
and
others)
> > > > > > I also added how to run it as a regular user in the
%description
> > > > > > area.
> > > > > > That's probrubly not the best place to put that, but I
figured
it's a
> > > > > > place a user can always see.
> > > > > > The script[4] to download, setup, trim and tar up the
source
with
> > > > > > it's
> > > > > > dependencies has been updated to use an external file, that
is
a list
> > > > > > of all the nodejs modules to pull out of the bundled
> > > > > > dependencies. It
> > > > > > also now goes as deep as it needs to in order to pull out
all
those
> > > > > > modules.
> > > > > > And there is the list of modules we are unbundeling.[5]
> > > > > > Here is where everything is. [6]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > These have been tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and x86_64.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I haven't decided between things-gateway and
mozilla-iot-gateway.
> > > > > Have you considered mozillathings-iot-gateway?
> > > > >
> > > > > > Both have good reasons to be the right name. Honestly, I
might just
> > > > > > flip a coin and let that decide.
> > > > > > If anyone has a strong preference for one or the other, let
me
know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Troy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] -
> > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> > > > > > [2] -
> > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> > > > > > [3] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> > > > > > [4] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > > > > [5] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > > > > [6] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith <
> > > > > > jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson <
tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Here's a fun fact.
> > > > > > > > gateway depends on 1000 node_modules (exactly I
believe)
> > > > > > > > I was able to unbundle 455 of those packages.
Ya!!
> > > > > > > > Of course, that means that I have to have 455
lines of
> > > > > > > > "Requires:" and
> > > > > > > > 545 lines of "Provides: bundled()" in
the spec file
> > > > > > > > Ya!!??
> > > > > > > > This spec file just went from a lightweight to a
sumo
wrestler in
> > > > > > > > one day.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately. I know the
NodeJS SIG
was
> > > > > > > working on a macro to automagically create the
"Provides:
> > > > > > > bundled()" lines, but I really don't know if
they ever got it
> > > > > > > working.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Jared
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > > List Guidelines:
> > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > > List Archives:
> > > > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
8:19 a.m.
I agree.
If you use the gateway rpi images, it automatically starts. I'll look
into how they do that, and if it's systemd based, I'll see about
getting the files.
I'd feel better if the files are coming from the group, so they can be tracked.
Troy
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM Jared K. Smith <jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing the hard work of packaging this up... things are looking pretty
good. I'll continue to work on the package review in the Bugzilla ticket.
>
> One question I had was regarding the gateway software itself -- I think we probably
need some sort of systemd initscript to start and stop the software, and some sort of
instructions for people to get started. Thoughts?
>
> -Jared
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:14 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Fedora Review Requests:
>> * mozilla-iot-gateway
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125
>> * nodejs-nanomsg
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673126
>>
>> Jared, if you could grab those two, I'd appreciate it.
>> Since the gateway package has bundling, I'd appreciate someone who
>> knows about bundling working on it.
>> nodejs-nanomsg is just the standard binary nodejs package. But it's
>> needed so that mozilla-iot-gateway can remain noarch.
>>
>> Troy
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:25 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> >
>> > > Please give a look. Especially the spec files. If they look good
>> >
>> > I will do in in the next few days.
>> >
>> > > I'll work on getting them into Fedora, hopefully in time for F30
>> > > freeze.
>> >
>> > I would much sooner if we could aim for much sooner than that to
>> > enable wider testing by interested parties. It's going to take time to
>> > do things like license review so the sooner we can get the spec up for
>> > review it will start to enable these things more formally. I don't
>> > expect the first version that lands in the repos proper to be perfect
>> > but it does enable easier testing by a wider audience and release
>> > early release often etc.
>> >
>> > While obviously there's still work to be done I think it's in good
>> > enough shape to get the package review submitted and in motion.
>> >
>> > Peter
>> >
>> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > I believe I have this working now.
>> > > > I've tried it on a couple of x86_64 machines and it works
great.
>> > > > I'm having some problems installing in on aarch64 (raspberry
pi 3)
>> > > > machines. But I'm pretty sure it will work.
>> > > >
>> > > > Here is the packages, spec files, and supporting scripts.
>> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
>> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
>> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
>> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
>> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
>> > > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
>> > > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
>> > > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
>> > > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
>> > > >
>> > > > Troy
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Two things:
>> > > > > 1 - I'm calling the package mozilla-iot-gateway
>> > > > > -- The reason for my final decision is that everything gets
saved in
>> > > > > ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen anything in it's
documentation
>> > > > > refering to it as things-gateway, other than that one
webpage.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 2 - As much as I liked removing the modules for over 400
modules, I
>> > > > > just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot of our nodejs modules
are very
>> > > > > old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs 3.6, things like that.
I'm
>> > > > > going back to my original design of only unbundling the
binary (arch
>> > > > > dependent) modules.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I should have a workable package tomorrow.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Troy
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell Doty
<rdoty(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
>> > > > > > > Next release of "gateway" is up, along
with a corresponding updated
>> > > > > > > nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
>> > > > > > > The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M and built
rpm[2] by
>> > > > > > > 20M. Ya!!
>> > > > > > > The spec file [3] has an updated license list with
all the licenses
>> > > > > > > from the bundled modules. Oddly enough, I
didn't find a single GPL,
>> > > > > > > though there was one LGPL.
>> > > > > > > It also has all the unbundled packages now as
Requires, and all the
>> > > > > > > bundled packages as Provides: bundled(). Thus
making the spec file
>> > > > > > > rather long.
>> > > > > > > I also went through and trimmed out all the cruft
that didn't need to
>> > > > > > > be installed for gateway to run (.travis.yml,
.babelrc, and others)
>> > > > > > > I also added how to run it as a regular user in the
%description
>> > > > > > > area.
>> > > > > > > That's probrubly not the best place to put
that, but I figured it's a
>> > > > > > > place a user can always see.
>> > > > > > > The script[4] to download, setup, trim and tar up
the source with
>> > > > > > > it's
>> > > > > > > dependencies has been updated to use an external
file, that is a list
>> > > > > > > of all the nodejs modules to pull out of the
bundled
>> > > > > > > dependencies. It
>> > > > > > > also now goes as deep as it needs to in order to
pull out all those
>> > > > > > > modules.
>> > > > > > > And there is the list of modules we are
unbundeling.[5]
>> > > > > > > Here is where everything is. [6]
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > These have been tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and
x86_64.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I haven't decided between things-gateway and
mozilla-iot-gateway.
>> > > > > > Have you considered mozillathings-iot-gateway?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Both have good reasons to be the right name.
Honestly, I might just
>> > > > > > > flip a coin and let that decide.
>> > > > > > > If anyone has a strong preference for one or the
other, let me know.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Troy
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > [1] -
>> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
>> > > > > > > [2] -
>> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
>> > > > > > > [3] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
>> > > > > > > [4] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
>> > > > > > > [5] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
>> > > > > > > [6] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
>> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith
<
>> > > > > > > jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com>
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > Here's a fun fact.
>> > > > > > > > > gateway depends on 1000 node_modules
(exactly I believe)
>> > > > > > > > > I was able to unbundle 455 of those
packages. Ya!!
>> > > > > > > > > Of course, that means that I have to have
455 lines of
>> > > > > > > > > "Requires:" and
>> > > > > > > > > 545 lines of "Provides:
bundled()" in the spec file
>> > > > > > > > > Ya!!??
>> > > > > > > > > This spec file just went from a
lightweight to a sumo wrestler in
>> > > > > > > > > one day.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately. I
know the NodeJS SIG was
>> > > > > > > > working on a macro to automagically create the
"Provides:
>> > > > > > > > bundled()" lines, but I really don't
know if they ever got it
>> > > > > > > > working.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > -Jared
>> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> > > > > > > List Guidelines:
>> > > > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > > > > > > List Archives:
>> > > > > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> > > > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > > > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
9:24 a.m.
I found the systemd scripts from the gateway image. They are very
well commented so they will be easy to use.
The only question is have is what user to have these run as?
Should we add a new user? Or use one of the standard ones?
Either way, we'll have to make sure we have that user available, using
the standard fedora rpm techniques for doing that.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:19 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I agree.
> If you use the gateway rpi images, it automatically starts. I'll look
> into how they do that, and if it's systemd based, I'll see about
> getting the files.
> I'd feel better if the files are coming from the group, so they can be tracked.
>
> Troy
>
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM Jared K. Smith <jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for doing the hard work of packaging this up... things are looking pretty
good. I'll continue to work on the package review in the Bugzilla ticket.
> >
> > One question I had was regarding the gateway software itself -- I think we
probably need some sort of systemd initscript to start and stop the software, and some
sort of instructions for people to get started. Thoughts?
> >
> > -Jared
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:14 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Fedora Review Requests:
> >> * mozilla-iot-gateway
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125
> >> * nodejs-nanomsg
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673126
> >>
> >> Jared, if you could grab those two, I'd appreciate it.
> >> Since the gateway package has bundling, I'd appreciate someone who
> >> knows about bundling working on it.
> >> nodejs-nanomsg is just the standard binary nodejs package. But it's
> >> needed so that mozilla-iot-gateway can remain noarch.
> >>
> >> Troy
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:25 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Please give a look. Especially the spec files. If they look
good
> >> >
> >> > I will do in in the next few days.
> >> >
> >> > > I'll work on getting them into Fedora, hopefully in time for
F30
> >> > > freeze.
> >> >
> >> > I would much sooner if we could aim for much sooner than that to
> >> > enable wider testing by interested parties. It's going to take time
to
> >> > do things like license review so the sooner we can get the spec up for
> >> > review it will start to enable these things more formally. I don't
> >> > expect the first version that lands in the repos proper to be perfect
> >> > but it does enable easier testing by a wider audience and release
> >> > early release often etc.
> >> >
> >> > While obviously there's still work to be done I think it's in
good
> >> > enough shape to get the package review submitted and in motion.
> >> >
> >> > Peter
> >> >
> >> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I believe I have this working now.
> >> > > > I've tried it on a couple of x86_64 machines and it works
great.
> >> > > > I'm having some problems installing in on aarch64
(raspberry pi 3)
> >> > > > machines. But I'm pretty sure it will work.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Here is the packages, spec files, and supporting scripts.
> >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
> >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
> >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
> >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
> >> > > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> >> > > > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Troy
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Two things:
> >> > > > > 1 - I'm calling the package mozilla-iot-gateway
> >> > > > > -- The reason for my final decision is that everything
gets saved in
> >> > > > > ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen anything in
it's documentation
> >> > > > > refering to it as things-gateway, other than that one
webpage.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 2 - As much as I liked removing the modules for over 400
modules, I
> >> > > > > just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot of our nodejs
modules are very
> >> > > > > old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs 3.6, things like
that. I'm
> >> > > > > going back to my original design of only unbundling the
binary (arch
> >> > > > > dependent) modules.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I should have a workable package tomorrow.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Troy
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell Doty
<rdoty(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson
wrote:
> >> > > > > > > Next release of "gateway" is up,
along with a corresponding updated
> >> > > > > > > nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
> >> > > > > > > The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M and
built rpm[2] by
> >> > > > > > > 20M. Ya!!
> >> > > > > > > The spec file [3] has an updated license list
with all the licenses
> >> > > > > > > from the bundled modules. Oddly enough, I
didn't find a single GPL,
> >> > > > > > > though there was one LGPL.
> >> > > > > > > It also has all the unbundled packages now as
Requires, and all the
> >> > > > > > > bundled packages as Provides: bundled(). Thus
making the spec file
> >> > > > > > > rather long.
> >> > > > > > > I also went through and trimmed out all the
cruft that didn't need to
> >> > > > > > > be installed for gateway to run (.travis.yml,
.babelrc, and others)
> >> > > > > > > I also added how to run it as a regular user
in the %description
> >> > > > > > > area.
> >> > > > > > > That's probrubly not the best place to put
that, but I figured it's a
> >> > > > > > > place a user can always see.
> >> > > > > > > The script[4] to download, setup, trim and tar
up the source with
> >> > > > > > > it's
> >> > > > > > > dependencies has been updated to use an
external file, that is a list
> >> > > > > > > of all the nodejs modules to pull out of the
bundled
> >> > > > > > > dependencies. It
> >> > > > > > > also now goes as deep as it needs to in order
to pull out all those
> >> > > > > > > modules.
> >> > > > > > > And there is the list of modules we are
unbundeling.[5]
> >> > > > > > > Here is where everything is. [6]
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > These have been tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and
x86_64.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I haven't decided between things-gateway
and mozilla-iot-gateway.
> >> > > > > > Have you considered mozillathings-iot-gateway?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Both have good reasons to be the right name.
Honestly, I might just
> >> > > > > > > flip a coin and let that decide.
> >> > > > > > > If anyone has a strong preference for one or
the other, let me know.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Troy
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > [1] -
> >> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> >> > > > > > > [2] -
> >> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> >> > > > > > > [3] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> >> > > > > > > [4] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> >> > > > > > > [5] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> >> > > > > > > [6] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> >> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith
<
> >> > > > > > > jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy
Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > Here's a fun fact.
> >> > > > > > > > > gateway depends on 1000 node_modules
(exactly I believe)
> >> > > > > > > > > I was able to unbundle 455 of those
packages. Ya!!
> >> > > > > > > > > Of course, that means that I have to
have 455 lines of
> >> > > > > > > > > "Requires:" and
> >> > > > > > > > > 545 lines of "Provides:
bundled()" in the spec file
> >> > > > > > > > > Ya!!??
> >> > > > > > > > > This spec file just went from a
lightweight to a sumo wrestler in
> >> > > > > > > > > one day.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately.
I know the NodeJS SIG was
> >> > > > > > > > working on a macro to automagically
create the "Provides:
> >> > > > > > > > bundled()" lines, but I really
don't know if they ever got it
> >> > > > > > > > working.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > -Jared
> >> > > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> >> > > > > > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> > > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> >> > > > > > > List Guidelines:
> >> > > > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >> > > > > > > List Archives:
> >> > > > > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> >> > > > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >> > > > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> > > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> >> > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >> > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> >> > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
9:29 a.m.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:24 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I found the systemd scripts from the gateway image. They are very
well commented so they will be easy to use.
The only question is have is what user to have these run as?
Should we add a new user? Or use one of the standard ones?
Either way, we'll have to make sure we have that user available, using
the standard fedora rpm techniques for doing that.
I think we should create a new one, the packaging guidelines should
have the details for that
P
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:19 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > I agree.
> > If you use the gateway rpi images, it automatically starts. I'll look
> > into how they do that, and if it's systemd based, I'll see about
> > getting the files.
> > I'd feel better if the files are coming from the group, so they can be
tracked.
> >
> > Troy
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM Jared K. Smith <jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for doing the hard work of packaging this up... things are looking
pretty good. I'll continue to work on the package review in the Bugzilla ticket.
> > >
> > > One question I had was regarding the gateway software itself -- I think we
probably need some sort of systemd initscript to start and stop the software, and some
sort of instructions for people to get started. Thoughts?
> > >
> > > -Jared
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:14 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Fedora Review Requests:
> > >> * mozilla-iot-gateway
> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125
> > >> * nodejs-nanomsg
> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673126
> > >>
> > >> Jared, if you could grab those two, I'd appreciate it.
> > >> Since the gateway package has bundling, I'd appreciate someone who
> > >> knows about bundling working on it.
> > >> nodejs-nanomsg is just the standard binary nodejs package. But
it's
> > >> needed so that mozilla-iot-gateway can remain noarch.
> > >>
> > >> Troy
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:25 AM Peter Robinson
<pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Please give a look. Especially the spec files. If they look
good
> > >> >
> > >> > I will do in in the next few days.
> > >> >
> > >> > > I'll work on getting them into Fedora, hopefully in time
for F30
> > >> > > freeze.
> > >> >
> > >> > I would much sooner if we could aim for much sooner than that to
> > >> > enable wider testing by interested parties. It's going to take
time to
> > >> > do things like license review so the sooner we can get the spec up
for
> > >> > review it will start to enable these things more formally. I
don't
> > >> > expect the first version that lands in the repos proper to be
perfect
> > >> > but it does enable easier testing by a wider audience and release
> > >> > early release often etc.
> > >> >
> > >> > While obviously there's still work to be done I think it's
in good
> > >> > enough shape to get the package review submitted and in motion.
> > >> >
> > >> > Peter
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I believe I have this working now.
> > >> > > > I've tried it on a couple of x86_64 machines and it
works great.
> > >> > > > I'm having some problems installing in on aarch64
(raspberry pi 3)
> > >> > > > machines. But I'm pretty sure it will work.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Here is the packages, spec files, and supporting
scripts.
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Troy
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Two things:
> > >> > > > > 1 - I'm calling the package
mozilla-iot-gateway
> > >> > > > > -- The reason for my final decision is that
everything gets saved in
> > >> > > > > ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen anything in
it's documentation
> > >> > > > > refering to it as things-gateway, other than that
one webpage.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > 2 - As much as I liked removing the modules for
over 400 modules, I
> > >> > > > > just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot of our
nodejs modules are very
> > >> > > > > old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs 3.6, things
like that. I'm
> > >> > > > > going back to my original design of only unbundling
the binary (arch
> > >> > > > > dependent) modules.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > I should have a workable package tomorrow.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Troy
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell Doty
<rdoty(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson
wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > Next release of "gateway" is
up, along with a corresponding updated
> > >> > > > > > > nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
> > >> > > > > > > The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M
and built rpm[2] by
> > >> > > > > > > 20M. Ya!!
> > >> > > > > > > The spec file [3] has an updated license
list with all the licenses
> > >> > > > > > > from the bundled modules. Oddly enough,
I didn't find a single GPL,
> > >> > > > > > > though there was one LGPL.
> > >> > > > > > > It also has all the unbundled packages
now as Requires, and all the
> > >> > > > > > > bundled packages as Provides: bundled().
Thus making the spec file
> > >> > > > > > > rather long.
> > >> > > > > > > I also went through and trimmed out all
the cruft that didn't need to
> > >> > > > > > > be installed for gateway to run
(.travis.yml, .babelrc, and others)
> > >> > > > > > > I also added how to run it as a regular
user in the %description
> > >> > > > > > > area.
> > >> > > > > > > That's probrubly not the best place
to put that, but I figured it's a
> > >> > > > > > > place a user can always see.
> > >> > > > > > > The script[4] to download, setup, trim
and tar up the source with
> > >> > > > > > > it's
> > >> > > > > > > dependencies has been updated to use an
external file, that is a list
> > >> > > > > > > of all the nodejs modules to pull out of
the bundled
> > >> > > > > > > dependencies. It
> > >> > > > > > > also now goes as deep as it needs to in
order to pull out all those
> > >> > > > > > > modules.
> > >> > > > > > > And there is the list of modules we are
unbundeling.[5]
> > >> > > > > > > Here is where everything is. [6]
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > These have been tested on aarch64
(rpi3b+) and x86_64.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > I haven't decided between
things-gateway and mozilla-iot-gateway.
> > >> > > > > > Have you considered
mozillathings-iot-gateway?
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Both have good reasons to be the right
name. Honestly, I might just
> > >> > > > > > > flip a coin and let that decide.
> > >> > > > > > > If anyone has a strong preference for one
or the other, let me know.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Troy
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > [1] -
> > >> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> > >> > > > > > > [2] -
> > >> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> > >> > > > > > > [3] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> > >> > > > > > > [4] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > >> > > > > > > [5] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > >> > > > > > > [6] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K.
Smith <
> > >> > > > > > > jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy
Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > Here's a fun fact.
> > >> > > > > > > > > gateway depends on 1000
node_modules (exactly I believe)
> > >> > > > > > > > > I was able to unbundle 455 of
those packages. Ya!!
> > >> > > > > > > > > Of course, that means that I
have to have 455 lines of
> > >> > > > > > > > > "Requires:" and
> > >> > > > > > > > > 545 lines of "Provides:
bundled()" in the spec file
> > >> > > > > > > > > Ya!!??
> > >> > > > > > > > > This spec file just went from a
lightweight to a sumo wrestler in
> > >> > > > > > > > > one day.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > That's the NodeJS way,
unfortunately. I know the NodeJS SIG was
> > >> > > > > > > > working on a macro to automagically
create the "Provides:
> > >> > > > > > > > bundled()" lines, but I really
don't know if they ever got it
> > >> > > > > > > > working.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > -Jared
> > >> > > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > >> > > > > > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > >> > > > > > > List Guidelines:
> > >> > > > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > >> > > > > > > List Archives:
> > >> > > > > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > >> > > > > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > >> > > > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > >> > > > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > >> > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > >> > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > >> > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > >> > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > >> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
9:45 a.m.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:29 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:24 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I found the systemd scripts from the gateway image. They are very
> well commented so they will be easy to use.
> The only question is have is what user to have these run as?
> Should we add a new user? Or use one of the standard ones?
> Either way, we'll have to make sure we have that user available, using
> the standard fedora rpm techniques for doing that.
I think we should create a new one, the packaging guidelines should
have the details for that
Yep, just read through them.
I'm choosing the Dynamic allocation method [1] because it says the
soft static method should only be used if the UID needs to be shared
between computers, or the UID is needed in the initfs.
I guess the logical username would be "gateway"
mozillaiotgateway just seems too long.
[1] - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups#Dynamic_allocation
> P
>
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:19 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree.
> > > If you use the gateway rpi images, it automatically starts. I'll look
> > > into how they do that, and if it's systemd based, I'll see about
> > > getting the files.
> > > I'd feel better if the files are coming from the group, so they can be
tracked.
> > >
> > > Troy
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM Jared K. Smith
<jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for doing the hard work of packaging this up... things are
looking pretty good. I'll continue to work on the package review in the Bugzilla
ticket.
> > > >
> > > > One question I had was regarding the gateway software itself -- I
think we probably need some sort of systemd initscript to start and stop the software, and
some sort of instructions for people to get started. Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > -Jared
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:14 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Fedora Review Requests:
> > > >> * mozilla-iot-gateway
> > > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125
> > > >> * nodejs-nanomsg
> > > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673126
> > > >>
> > > >> Jared, if you could grab those two, I'd appreciate it.
> > > >> Since the gateway package has bundling, I'd appreciate someone
who
> > > >> knows about bundling working on it.
> > > >> nodejs-nanomsg is just the standard binary nodejs package. But
it's
> > > >> needed so that mozilla-iot-gateway can remain noarch.
> > > >>
> > > >> Troy
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:25 AM Peter Robinson
<pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Please give a look. Especially the spec files. If they
look good
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I will do in in the next few days.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > I'll work on getting them into Fedora, hopefully in
time for F30
> > > >> > > freeze.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I would much sooner if we could aim for much sooner than that
to
> > > >> > enable wider testing by interested parties. It's going to
take time to
> > > >> > do things like license review so the sooner we can get the
spec up for
> > > >> > review it will start to enable these things more formally. I
don't
> > > >> > expect the first version that lands in the repos proper to be
perfect
> > > >> > but it does enable easier testing by a wider audience and
release
> > > >> > early release often etc.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > While obviously there's still work to be done I think
it's in good
> > > >> > enough shape to get the package review submitted and in
motion.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Peter
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I believe I have this working now.
> > > >> > > > I've tried it on a couple of x86_64 machines
and it works great.
> > > >> > > > I'm having some problems installing in on
aarch64 (raspberry pi 3)
> > > >> > > > machines. But I'm pretty sure it will work.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Here is the packages, spec files, and supporting
scripts.
> > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
> > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
> > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
> > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
> > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Troy
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Two things:
> > > >> > > > > 1 - I'm calling the package
mozilla-iot-gateway
> > > >> > > > > -- The reason for my final decision is that
everything gets saved in
> > > >> > > > > ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen
anything in it's documentation
> > > >> > > > > refering to it as things-gateway, other than
that one webpage.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > 2 - As much as I liked removing the modules
for over 400 modules, I
> > > >> > > > > just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot of our
nodejs modules are very
> > > >> > > > > old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs 3.6,
things like that. I'm
> > > >> > > > > going back to my original design of only
unbundling the binary (arch
> > > >> > > > > dependent) modules.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > I should have a workable package tomorrow.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Troy
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell Doty
<rdoty(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy
Dawson wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > Next release of "gateway"
is up, along with a corresponding updated
> > > >> > > > > > > nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
> > > >> > > > > > > The source rpm[1] has been trimmed
by 30M and built rpm[2] by
> > > >> > > > > > > 20M. Ya!!
> > > >> > > > > > > The spec file [3] has an updated
license list with all the licenses
> > > >> > > > > > > from the bundled modules. Oddly
enough, I didn't find a single GPL,
> > > >> > > > > > > though there was one LGPL.
> > > >> > > > > > > It also has all the unbundled
packages now as Requires, and all the
> > > >> > > > > > > bundled packages as Provides:
bundled(). Thus making the spec file
> > > >> > > > > > > rather long.
> > > >> > > > > > > I also went through and trimmed out
all the cruft that didn't need to
> > > >> > > > > > > be installed for gateway to run
(.travis.yml, .babelrc, and others)
> > > >> > > > > > > I also added how to run it as a
regular user in the %description
> > > >> > > > > > > area.
> > > >> > > > > > > That's probrubly not the best
place to put that, but I figured it's a
> > > >> > > > > > > place a user can always see.
> > > >> > > > > > > The script[4] to download, setup,
trim and tar up the source with
> > > >> > > > > > > it's
> > > >> > > > > > > dependencies has been updated to use
an external file, that is a list
> > > >> > > > > > > of all the nodejs modules to pull
out of the bundled
> > > >> > > > > > > dependencies. It
> > > >> > > > > > > also now goes as deep as it needs to
in order to pull out all those
> > > >> > > > > > > modules.
> > > >> > > > > > > And there is the list of modules we
are unbundeling.[5]
> > > >> > > > > > > Here is where everything is. [6]
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > These have been tested on aarch64
(rpi3b+) and x86_64.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > I haven't decided between
things-gateway and mozilla-iot-gateway.
> > > >> > > > > > Have you considered
mozillathings-iot-gateway?
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Both have good reasons to be the
right name. Honestly, I might just
> > > >> > > > > > > flip a coin and let that decide.
> > > >> > > > > > > If anyone has a strong preference
for one or the other, let me know.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Troy
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > [1] -
> > > >> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> > > >> > > > > > > [2] -
> > > >> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> > > >> > > > > > > [3] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> > > >> > > > > > > [4] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > >> > > > > > > [5] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > >> > > > > > > [6] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM
Jared K. Smith <
> > > >> > > > > > > jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM
Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> > > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Here's a fun fact.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > gateway depends on 1000
node_modules (exactly I believe)
> > > >> > > > > > > > > I was able to unbundle 455
of those packages. Ya!!
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Of course, that means that
I have to have 455 lines of
> > > >> > > > > > > > > "Requires:" and
> > > >> > > > > > > > > 545 lines of
"Provides: bundled()" in the spec file
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Ya!!??
> > > >> > > > > > > > > This spec file just went
from a lightweight to a sumo wrestler in
> > > >> > > > > > > > > one day.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > That's the NodeJS way,
unfortunately. I know the NodeJS SIG was
> > > >> > > > > > > > working on a macro to
automagically create the "Provides:
> > > >> > > > > > > > bundled()" lines, but I
really don't know if they ever got it
> > > >> > > > > > > > working.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > -Jared
> > > >> > > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > > >> > > > > > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > >> > > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > >> > > > > > > List Guidelines:
> > > >> > > > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > >> > > > > > > List Archives:
> > > >> > > > > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > >> > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > > >> > > > > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > >> > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > >> > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > >> > > > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > >> > > > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > > >> > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > >> > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > >> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > >> > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > >> > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > >> > _______________________________________________
> > > >> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > >> > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > >> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > >> > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > >> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> _______________________________________________
> IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
4:29 p.m.
I have successfully packaged everything needed for Mozilla IOT Gateway
to run, with add-ons, on Fedora 30.
The following are new packages, in addition to the previous
mozilla-iot-gateway-addon-node
mozilla-iot-gateway-addon-python
nanomsg
python3-nnpy
I have them all packaged up and built in my fedora gateway directory
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
python3-nnpy is x86_64 only right now. I'm having some issues with my
F30 aarch64 images, and it requires nanomsg, so I have to build it in
mock instead of brew.
One thing to note.
The gateway will download and build the various add-ons. But ... you
will need to turn your firewall off in order to probe for regular
wireless devices such as LIFX or TP-Link.
So you can either put the ip address in for those devices. Or turn
your firewall off, probe, then turn your firewall back on.
I'll be doing some firewall sniffing to figure out what port(s) they
are probing on, but for now it's easiest to turn your firewall off
while you probe.
Troy
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:45 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:29 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:24 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I found the systemd scripts from the gateway image. They are very
> > > well commented so they will be easy to use.
> > > The only question is have is what user to have these run as?
> > > Should we add a new user? Or use one of the standard ones?
> > > Either way, we'll have to make sure we have that user available, using
> > > the standard fedora rpm techniques for doing that.
> >
> > I think we should create a new one, the packaging guidelines should
> > have the details for that
> >
>
> Yep, just read through them.
> I'm choosing the Dynamic allocation method [1] because it says the
> soft static method should only be used if the UID needs to be shared
> between computers, or the UID is needed in the initfs.
> I guess the logical username would be "gateway"
> mozillaiotgateway just seems too long.
>
> [1] - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups#Dynamic_allocation
> > P
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:19 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I agree.
> > > > If you use the gateway rpi images, it automatically starts. I'll
look
> > > > into how they do that, and if it's systemd based, I'll see
about
> > > > getting the files.
> > > > I'd feel better if the files are coming from the group, so they
can be tracked.
> > > >
> > > > Troy
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM Jared K. Smith
<jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for doing the hard work of packaging this up... things are
looking pretty good. I'll continue to work on the package review in the Bugzilla
ticket.
> > > > >
> > > > > One question I had was regarding the gateway software itself -- I
think we probably need some sort of systemd initscript to start and stop the software, and
some sort of instructions for people to get started. Thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Jared
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:14 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Fedora Review Requests:
> > > > >> * mozilla-iot-gateway
> > > > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125
> > > > >> * nodejs-nanomsg
> > > > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673126
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Jared, if you could grab those two, I'd appreciate it.
> > > > >> Since the gateway package has bundling, I'd appreciate
someone who
> > > > >> knows about bundling working on it.
> > > > >> nodejs-nanomsg is just the standard binary nodejs package.
But it's
> > > > >> needed so that mozilla-iot-gateway can remain noarch.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Troy
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:25 AM Peter Robinson
<pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Please give a look. Especially the spec files. If
they look good
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I will do in in the next few days.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > I'll work on getting them into Fedora,
hopefully in time for F30
> > > > >> > > freeze.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I would much sooner if we could aim for much sooner than
that to
> > > > >> > enable wider testing by interested parties. It's
going to take time to
> > > > >> > do things like license review so the sooner we can get
the spec up for
> > > > >> > review it will start to enable these things more
formally. I don't
> > > > >> > expect the first version that lands in the repos proper
to be perfect
> > > > >> > but it does enable easier testing by a wider audience
and release
> > > > >> > early release often etc.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > While obviously there's still work to be done I
think it's in good
> > > > >> > enough shape to get the package review submitted and in
motion.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Peter
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > I believe I have this working now.
> > > > >> > > > I've tried it on a couple of x86_64
machines and it works great.
> > > > >> > > > I'm having some problems installing in on
aarch64 (raspberry pi 3)
> > > > >> > > > machines. But I'm pretty sure it will
work.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Here is the packages, spec files, and
supporting scripts.
> > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
> > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
> > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
> > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
> > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Troy
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Two things:
> > > > >> > > > > 1 - I'm calling the package
mozilla-iot-gateway
> > > > >> > > > > -- The reason for my final decision is
that everything gets saved in
> > > > >> > > > > ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen
anything in it's documentation
> > > > >> > > > > refering to it as things-gateway, other
than that one webpage.
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > 2 - As much as I liked removing the
modules for over 400 modules, I
> > > > >> > > > > just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot
of our nodejs modules are very
> > > > >> > > > > old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs
3.6, things like that. I'm
> > > > >> > > > > going back to my original design of only
unbundling the binary (arch
> > > > >> > > > > dependent) modules.
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > I should have a workable package
tomorrow.
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Troy
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell
Doty <rdoty(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800,
Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > Next release of
"gateway" is up, along with a corresponding updated
> > > > >> > > > > > > nodejs-nanomsg for all arches.
> > > > >> > > > > > > The source rpm[1] has been
trimmed by 30M and built rpm[2] by
> > > > >> > > > > > > 20M. Ya!!
> > > > >> > > > > > > The spec file [3] has an
updated license list with all the licenses
> > > > >> > > > > > > from the bundled modules.
Oddly enough, I didn't find a single GPL,
> > > > >> > > > > > > though there was one LGPL.
> > > > >> > > > > > > It also has all the unbundled
packages now as Requires, and all the
> > > > >> > > > > > > bundled packages as Provides:
bundled(). Thus making the spec file
> > > > >> > > > > > > rather long.
> > > > >> > > > > > > I also went through and trimmed
out all the cruft that didn't need to
> > > > >> > > > > > > be installed for gateway to run
(.travis.yml, .babelrc, and others)
> > > > >> > > > > > > I also added how to run it as a
regular user in the %description
> > > > >> > > > > > > area.
> > > > >> > > > > > > That's probrubly not the
best place to put that, but I figured it's a
> > > > >> > > > > > > place a user can always see.
> > > > >> > > > > > > The script[4] to download,
setup, trim and tar up the source with
> > > > >> > > > > > > it's
> > > > >> > > > > > > dependencies has been updated
to use an external file, that is a list
> > > > >> > > > > > > of all the nodejs modules to
pull out of the bundled
> > > > >> > > > > > > dependencies. It
> > > > >> > > > > > > also now goes as deep as it
needs to in order to pull out all those
> > > > >> > > > > > > modules.
> > > > >> > > > > > > And there is the list of
modules we are unbundeling.[5]
> > > > >> > > > > > > Here is where everything is.
[6]
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > These have been tested on
aarch64 (rpi3b+) and x86_64.
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > I haven't decided between
things-gateway and mozilla-iot-gateway.
> > > > >> > > > > > Have you considered
mozillathings-iot-gateway?
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > Both have good reasons to be
the right name. Honestly, I might just
> > > > >> > > > > > > flip a coin and let that
decide.
> > > > >> > > > > > > If anyone has a strong
preference for one or the other, let me know.
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > Troy
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > [1] -
> > > > >> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> > > > >> > > > > > > [2] -
> > > > >> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> > > > >> > > > > > > [3] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> > > > >> > > > > > > [4] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > > >> > > > > > > [5] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > > >> > > > > > > [6] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM
Jared K. Smith <
> > > > >> > > > > > > jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at
5:56 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Here's a fun
fact.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > gateway depends on
1000 node_modules (exactly I believe)
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > I was able to
unbundle 455 of those packages. Ya!!
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Of course, that means
that I have to have 455 lines of
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > "Requires:"
and
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > 545 lines of
"Provides: bundled()" in the spec file
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Ya!!??
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > This spec file just
went from a lightweight to a sumo wrestler in
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > one day.
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > That's the NodeJS way,
unfortunately. I know the NodeJS SIG was
> > > > >> > > > > > > > working on a macro to
automagically create the "Provides:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > bundled()" lines, but
I really don't know if they ever got it
> > > > >> > > > > > > > working.
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > -Jared
> > > > >> > > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > > > >> > > > > > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > >> > > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > >> > > > > > > List Guidelines:
> > > > >> > > > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > >> > > > > > > List Archives:
> > > > >> > > > > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > >> > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > > > >> > > > > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > >> > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > >> > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > >> > > > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > >> > > > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > > > >> > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > >> > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > >> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > >> > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > >> > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > >> > _______________________________________________
> > > > >> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > >> > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > >> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > >> > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > >> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
2 p.m.
I now have review requests for all the packages needed.
mozilla-iot-gateway-addon-node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680145
mozilla-iot-gateway-addon-python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680143
nanomsg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680140
python3-nnpy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680141
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:29 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I have successfully packaged everything needed for Mozilla IOT Gateway
> to run, with add-ons, on Fedora 30.
>
> The following are new packages, in addition to the previous
> mozilla-iot-gateway-addon-node
> mozilla-iot-gateway-addon-python
> nanomsg
> python3-nnpy
>
> I have them all packaged up and built in my fedora gateway directory
> https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
>
> python3-nnpy is x86_64 only right now. I'm having some issues with my
> F30 aarch64 images, and it requires nanomsg, so I have to build it in
> mock instead of brew.
>
> One thing to note.
> The gateway will download and build the various add-ons. But ... you
> will need to turn your firewall off in order to probe for regular
> wireless devices such as LIFX or TP-Link.
> So you can either put the ip address in for those devices. Or turn
> your firewall off, probe, then turn your firewall back on.
>
> I'll be doing some firewall sniffing to figure out what port(s) they
> are probing on, but for now it's easiest to turn your firewall off
> while you probe.
>
> Troy
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:45 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:29 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:24 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I found the systemd scripts from the gateway image. They are very
> > > > well commented so they will be easy to use.
> > > > The only question is have is what user to have these run as?
> > > > Should we add a new user? Or use one of the standard ones?
> > > > Either way, we'll have to make sure we have that user available,
using
> > > > the standard fedora rpm techniques for doing that.
> > >
> > > I think we should create a new one, the packaging guidelines should
> > > have the details for that
> > >
> >
> > Yep, just read through them.
> > I'm choosing the Dynamic allocation method [1] because it says the
> > soft static method should only be used if the UID needs to be shared
> > between computers, or the UID is needed in the initfs.
> > I guess the logical username would be "gateway"
> > mozillaiotgateway just seems too long.
> >
> > [1] -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups#Dynamic_allocation
> > > P
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:19 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree.
> > > > > If you use the gateway rpi images, it automatically starts.
I'll look
> > > > > into how they do that, and if it's systemd based, I'll
see about
> > > > > getting the files.
> > > > > I'd feel better if the files are coming from the group, so
they can be tracked.
> > > > >
> > > > > Troy
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM Jared K. Smith
<jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for doing the hard work of packaging this up...
things are looking pretty good. I'll continue to work on the package review in the
Bugzilla ticket.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > One question I had was regarding the gateway software itself
-- I think we probably need some sort of systemd initscript to start and stop the
software, and some sort of instructions for people to get started. Thoughts?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Jared
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:14 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Fedora Review Requests:
> > > > > >> * mozilla-iot-gateway
> > > > > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125
> > > > > >> * nodejs-nanomsg
> > > > > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673126
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Jared, if you could grab those two, I'd appreciate
it.
> > > > > >> Since the gateway package has bundling, I'd
appreciate someone who
> > > > > >> knows about bundling working on it.
> > > > > >> nodejs-nanomsg is just the standard binary nodejs
package. But it's
> > > > > >> needed so that mozilla-iot-gateway can remain noarch.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Troy
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:25 AM Peter Robinson
<pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > Please give a look. Especially the spec
files. If they look good
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I will do in in the next few days.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > I'll work on getting them into Fedora,
hopefully in time for F30
> > > > > >> > > freeze.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > I would much sooner if we could aim for much sooner
than that to
> > > > > >> > enable wider testing by interested parties.
It's going to take time to
> > > > > >> > do things like license review so the sooner we can
get the spec up for
> > > > > >> > review it will start to enable these things more
formally. I don't
> > > > > >> > expect the first version that lands in the repos
proper to be perfect
> > > > > >> > but it does enable easier testing by a wider
audience and release
> > > > > >> > early release often etc.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > While obviously there's still work to be done I
think it's in good
> > > > > >> > enough shape to get the package review submitted
and in motion.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Peter
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > I believe I have this working now.
> > > > > >> > > > I've tried it on a couple of x86_64
machines and it works great.
> > > > > >> > > > I'm having some problems installing
in on aarch64 (raspberry pi 3)
> > > > > >> > > > machines. But I'm pretty sure it
will work.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Here is the packages, spec files, and
supporting scripts.
> > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
> > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
> > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
> > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
> > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Troy
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy
Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Two things:
> > > > > >> > > > > 1 - I'm calling the package
mozilla-iot-gateway
> > > > > >> > > > > -- The reason for my final decision
is that everything gets saved in
> > > > > >> > > > > ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't
seen anything in it's documentation
> > > > > >> > > > > refering to it as things-gateway,
other than that one webpage.
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > 2 - As much as I liked removing the
modules for over 400 modules, I
> > > > > >> > > > > just hit bug after bug after bug.
Alot of our nodejs modules are very
> > > > > >> > > > > old. versions 0.7 when gateway
needs 3.6, things like that. I'm
> > > > > >> > > > > going back to my original design of
only unbundling the binary (arch
> > > > > >> > > > > dependent) modules.
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > I should have a workable package
tomorrow.
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Troy
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM
Russell Doty <rdoty(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17
-0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > > > Next release of
"gateway" is up, along with a corresponding updated
> > > > > >> > > > > > > nodejs-nanomsg for all
arches.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > The source rpm[1] has been
trimmed by 30M and built rpm[2] by
> > > > > >> > > > > > > 20M. Ya!!
> > > > > >> > > > > > > The spec file [3] has an
updated license list with all the licenses
> > > > > >> > > > > > > from the bundled modules.
Oddly enough, I didn't find a single GPL,
> > > > > >> > > > > > > though there was one
LGPL.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > It also has all the
unbundled packages now as Requires, and all the
> > > > > >> > > > > > > bundled packages as
Provides: bundled(). Thus making the spec file
> > > > > >> > > > > > > rather long.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > I also went through and
trimmed out all the cruft that didn't need to
> > > > > >> > > > > > > be installed for gateway
to run (.travis.yml, .babelrc, and others)
> > > > > >> > > > > > > I also added how to run it
as a regular user in the %description
> > > > > >> > > > > > > area.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > That's probrubly not
the best place to put that, but I figured it's a
> > > > > >> > > > > > > place a user can always
see.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > The script[4] to download,
setup, trim and tar up the source with
> > > > > >> > > > > > > it's
> > > > > >> > > > > > > dependencies has been
updated to use an external file, that is a list
> > > > > >> > > > > > > of all the nodejs modules
to pull out of the bundled
> > > > > >> > > > > > > dependencies. It
> > > > > >> > > > > > > also now goes as deep as
it needs to in order to pull out all those
> > > > > >> > > > > > > modules.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > And there is the list of
modules we are unbundeling.[5]
> > > > > >> > > > > > > Here is where everything
is. [6]
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > These have been tested on
aarch64 (rpi3b+) and x86_64.
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > I haven't decided
between things-gateway and mozilla-iot-gateway.
> > > > > >> > > > > > Have you considered
mozillathings-iot-gateway?
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > Both have good reasons to
be the right name. Honestly, I might just
> > > > > >> > > > > > > flip a coin and let that
decide.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > If anyone has a strong
preference for one or the other, let me know.
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > Troy
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [1] -
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [2] -
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [3] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [4] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [5] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > > > >> > > > > > > [6] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> > > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at
1:39 PM Jared K. Smith <
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019
at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Here's a fun
fact.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > gateway depends
on 1000 node_modules (exactly I believe)
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I was able to
unbundle 455 of those packages. Ya!!
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Of course, that
means that I have to have 455 lines of
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
"Requires:" and
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 545 lines of
"Provides: bundled()" in the spec file
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Ya!!??
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > This spec file
just went from a lightweight to a sumo wrestler in
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > one day.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > That's the NodeJS
way, unfortunately. I know the NodeJS SIG was
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > working on a macro to
automagically create the "Provides:
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > bundled()"
lines, but I really don't know if they ever got it
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > working.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > -Jared
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > > > > >> > > > > > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe send an
email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > >> > > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > >> > > > > > > List Guidelines:
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > >> > > > > > > List Archives:
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > >> > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > > > > >> > > > > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > >> > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > >> > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > >> > > > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > >> > > > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > >> > >
_______________________________________________
> > > > > >> > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > >> > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > >> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > >> > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > >> > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > >> > _______________________________________________
> > > > > >> > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > >> > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > >> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > >> > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > >> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
5:59 p.m.
I have updated mozilla-iot-gateway spec, src, and noarc.rpm. They
have the following changes:
- Changed service username from gateway to moz-iot-gateway
-- systemd services file was updated to show this change
- moz-iot-gateway is now added to the dialout group.
-- This was needed due to zwave and zigbee dongles need the dialout
group permissions
- Fixed some bad python shebangs that prevented the package from
building on F30+
I have built and verified that this installs and works on a clean F29
server install
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:00 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I now have review requests for all the packages needed.
>
> mozilla-iot-gateway-addon-node
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680145
> mozilla-iot-gateway-addon-python
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680143
> nanomsg
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680140
> python3-nnpy
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680141
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:29 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have successfully packaged everything needed for Mozilla IOT Gateway
> > to run, with add-ons, on Fedora 30.
> >
> > The following are new packages, in addition to the previous
> > mozilla-iot-gateway-addon-node
> > mozilla-iot-gateway-addon-python
> > nanomsg
> > python3-nnpy
> >
> > I have them all packaged up and built in my fedora gateway directory
> > https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> >
> > python3-nnpy is x86_64 only right now. I'm having some issues with my
> > F30 aarch64 images, and it requires nanomsg, so I have to build it in
> > mock instead of brew.
> >
> > One thing to note.
> > The gateway will download and build the various add-ons. But ... you
> > will need to turn your firewall off in order to probe for regular
> > wireless devices such as LIFX or TP-Link.
> > So you can either put the ip address in for those devices. Or turn
> > your firewall off, probe, then turn your firewall back on.
> >
> > I'll be doing some firewall sniffing to figure out what port(s) they
> > are probing on, but for now it's easiest to turn your firewall off
> > while you probe.
> >
> > Troy
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:45 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:29 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:24 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I found the systemd scripts from the gateway image. They are
very
> > > > > well commented so they will be easy to use.
> > > > > The only question is have is what user to have these run as?
> > > > > Should we add a new user? Or use one of the standard ones?
> > > > > Either way, we'll have to make sure we have that user
available, using
> > > > > the standard fedora rpm techniques for doing that.
> > > >
> > > > I think we should create a new one, the packaging guidelines should
> > > > have the details for that
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yep, just read through them.
> > > I'm choosing the Dynamic allocation method [1] because it says the
> > > soft static method should only be used if the UID needs to be shared
> > > between computers, or the UID is needed in the initfs.
> > > I guess the logical username would be "gateway"
> > > mozillaiotgateway just seems too long.
> > >
> > > [1] -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups#Dynamic_allocation
> > > > P
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:19 AM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I agree.
> > > > > > If you use the gateway rpi images, it automatically starts.
I'll look
> > > > > > into how they do that, and if it's systemd based,
I'll see about
> > > > > > getting the files.
> > > > > > I'd feel better if the files are coming from the group,
so they can be tracked.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Troy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM Jared K. Smith
<jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for doing the hard work of packaging this up...
things are looking pretty good. I'll continue to work on the package review in the
Bugzilla ticket.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > One question I had was regarding the gateway software
itself -- I think we probably need some sort of systemd initscript to start and stop the
software, and some sort of instructions for people to get started. Thoughts?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Jared
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:14 PM Troy Dawson
<tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Fedora Review Requests:
> > > > > > >> * mozilla-iot-gateway
> > > > > > >>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125
> > > > > > >> * nodejs-nanomsg
> > > > > > >>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673126
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Jared, if you could grab those two, I'd
appreciate it.
> > > > > > >> Since the gateway package has bundling, I'd
appreciate someone who
> > > > > > >> knows about bundling working on it.
> > > > > > >> nodejs-nanomsg is just the standard binary nodejs
package. But it's
> > > > > > >> needed so that mozilla-iot-gateway can remain
noarch.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Troy
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:25 AM Peter Robinson
<pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > > Please give a look. Especially the spec
files. If they look good
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > I will do in in the next few days.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > > I'll work on getting them into
Fedora, hopefully in time for F30
> > > > > > >> > > freeze.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > I would much sooner if we could aim for much
sooner than that to
> > > > > > >> > enable wider testing by interested parties.
It's going to take time to
> > > > > > >> > do things like license review so the sooner we
can get the spec up for
> > > > > > >> > review it will start to enable these things
more formally. I don't
> > > > > > >> > expect the first version that lands in the
repos proper to be perfect
> > > > > > >> > but it does enable easier testing by a wider
audience and release
> > > > > > >> > early release often etc.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > While obviously there's still work to be
done I think it's in good
> > > > > > >> > enough shape to get the package review
submitted and in motion.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Peter
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy
Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > I believe I have this working now.
> > > > > > >> > > > I've tried it on a couple of
x86_64 machines and it works great.
> > > > > > >> > > > I'm having some problems
installing in on aarch64 (raspberry pi 3)
> > > > > > >> > > > machines. But I'm pretty sure
it will work.
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > Here is the packages, spec files,
and supporting scripts.
> > > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29...
> > > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarc...
> > > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_...
> > > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
> > > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec
> > > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > > > > >> > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > Troy
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy
Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > Two things:
> > > > > > >> > > > > 1 - I'm calling the package
mozilla-iot-gateway
> > > > > > >> > > > > -- The reason for my final
decision is that everything gets saved in
> > > > > > >> > > > > ~/.mozilla-iot Also, I
haven't seen anything in it's documentation
> > > > > > >> > > > > refering to it as
things-gateway, other than that one webpage.
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > 2 - As much as I liked removing
the modules for over 400 modules, I
> > > > > > >> > > > > just hit bug after bug after
bug. Alot of our nodejs modules are very
> > > > > > >> > > > > old. versions 0.7 when gateway
needs 3.6, things like that. I'm
> > > > > > >> > > > > going back to my original
design of only unbundling the binary (arch
> > > > > > >> > > > > dependent) modules.
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > I should have a workable
package tomorrow.
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > Troy
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM
Russell Doty <rdoty(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at
15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Next release of
"gateway" is up, along with a corresponding updated
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > nodejs-nanomsg for
all arches.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > The source rpm[1] has
been trimmed by 30M and built rpm[2] by
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 20M. Ya!!
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > The spec file [3]
has an updated license list with all the licenses
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > from the bundled
modules. Oddly enough, I didn't find a single GPL,
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > though there was one
LGPL.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > It also has all the
unbundled packages now as Requires, and all the
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > bundled packages as
Provides: bundled(). Thus making the spec file
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > rather long.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > I also went through
and trimmed out all the cruft that didn't need to
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > be installed for
gateway to run (.travis.yml, .babelrc, and others)
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > I also added how to
run it as a regular user in the %description
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > area.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > That's probrubly
not the best place to put that, but I figured it's a
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > place a user can
always see.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > The script[4] to
download, setup, trim and tar up the source with
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > dependencies has been
updated to use an external file, that is a list
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > of all the nodejs
modules to pull out of the bundled
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > dependencies. It
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > also now goes as deep
as it needs to in order to pull out all those
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > modules.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > And there is the list
of modules we are unbundeling.[5]
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Here is where
everything is. [6]
> > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > These have been
tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and x86_64.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > I haven't decided
between things-gateway and mozilla-iot-gateway.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > Have you considered
mozillathings-iot-gateway?
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Both have good
reasons to be the right name. Honestly, I might just
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > flip a coin and let
that decide.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > If anyone has a
strong preference for one or the other, let me know.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Troy
> > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > [1] -
> > > > > > >> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > [2] -
> > > > > > >> > > > > > >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > [3] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > [4] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > [5] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > [6] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019
at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith <
> > > > > > >> > > > > > >
jsmith(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29,
2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Here's
a fun fact.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > gateway
depends on 1000 node_modules (exactly I believe)
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I was able
to unbundle 455 of those packages. Ya!!
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Of course,
that means that I have to have 455 lines of
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
"Requires:" and
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 545 lines
of "Provides: bundled()" in the spec file
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Ya!!??
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > This spec
file just went from a lightweight to a sumo wrestler in
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > one day.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > That's the
NodeJS way, unfortunately. I know the NodeJS SIG was
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > working on a
macro to automagically create the "Provides:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > bundled()"
lines, but I really don't know if they ever got it
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > working.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -Jared
> > > > > > >> > > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe send
an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Fedora Code of
Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > List Guidelines:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > List Archives:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
_______________________________________________
> > > > > > >> > > > > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > >> > > > > > To unsubscribe send an
email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > >> > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > > >> > > > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > > >> > > > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > >> > >
_______________________________________________
> > > > > > >> > > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > >> > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > >> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > > >> > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > > >> > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > >> >
_______________________________________________
> > > > > > >> > IoT mailing list --
iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > > >> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > > >> > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > > >> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > IoT mailing list -- iot(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > > > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
1882
days inactive
1919
days old
26 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Jared K. Smith -
Peter Robinson -
Russell Doty -
Troy Dawson