Mat, Andrew,
Thanks for the clarifications.
I've understood that the jpackage-utils package has got a lot of
functions and facilities,
and it is not just a container for the utility scripts.
From this moment, I'll use the jpackage-utils as described without any
doubts :-)
---
Victor
Booth wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Andrew
Overholt<overholt(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> * Victor Vasilyev <Victor.Vasilyev(a)Sun.COM> [2009-07-31 11:11]:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Andrew Overholt wrote:
>>
>>> * Victor Vasilyev <Victor.Vasilyev(a)Sun.COM> [2009-07-30 19:33]:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Are there any valuable reasons for establishing dependencies on the
>>>> jpackage-utils if such facilities are not used in a
>>>> package/subpackage?
>>>>
>>> The BR on jpackage-utils could probably be made optional.
>>>
>>>
>> Why only BR?
>>
> Doesn't jpackage-utils own /usr/share/java which you're using in your
> jemmy package?
>
> Andrew
>
>
It also owns ${_javadocdir}, which is where you should be installing javadocs.