Mario Torre wrote:

Il 05/07/2009 07:00, Otto Rey ha scritto:

...

HI people...

I want to propose to update java-gnome to version 4.0.11 (currently we are offering 2.12.4 via yum)

Thanks

I think that some people still needs the old version as well, but I wonder why we don't ship both, as far as I know it's possible and Andrew and his team are doing a very good job with java gnome, it should be ready for prime time now :)

What's the backwards compatibility story with java-gnome? Did thgy manage not to break the API going forward?

Andrew.

Andrew John Hughes wrote:

On 10:33 Wed 08 Jul , Andrew Haley wrote:

...

Mario Torre wrote:

...

Il 05/07/2009 07:00, Otto Rey ha scritto:

...

HI people...

I want to propose to update java-gnome to version 4.0.11 (currently we are offering 2.12.4 via yum)

Thanks

I think that some people still needs the old version as well, but I wonder why we don't ship both, as far as I know it's possible and Andrew and his team are doing a very good job with java gnome, it should be ready for prime time now :)

What's the backwards compatibility story with java-gnome? Did thgy manage not to break the API going forward?

-- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list

AIUI, it's a complete redesign:

http://blogs.operationaldynamics.com/andrew/conferences/india/foss.in-2006-p...

Hmm, I wonder if they had the good sense to maintain the old API, along the lines of java.nio after java.io.

Andrew.