10 a.m.
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
java-maint-sig Meeting on 2021-06-24 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meeting-2(a)irc.libera.net
The meeting will be about:
More information available at:
https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9912/
11:09 a.m.
New subject: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : java-maint-sig Meeting
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 15:00 +0000, decathorpe(a)fedoraproject.org wrote:
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
java-maint-sig Meeting on 2021-06-24 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meeting-2(a)irc.libera.net
The meeting will be about:
More information available at:
https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9912/
Hello, Sorry I couldn't appear but the meeting happened ? I don't find
any reference ... I'm concerned with (1)
(1)
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
wget https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt -q -O - | grep
"Depending on"
Depending on: HdrHistogram (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks
ago)
Depending on: jakarta-activation (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
weeks ago)
Depending on: jmc (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
Depending on: jmc-core (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
Depending on: owasp-java-encoder (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
weeks ago)
--
Sérgio M. B.
3:57 a.m.
Hi Sérgio,
are you sure there was a meeting at all? And are you sure that invitation message isn’t a
left over from ancient days that no one pays attention to anymore?
I've been lurking around for a while trying to figure out how I could contribute to
Fedora Java. Not so easy.
Peter
Am 29.06.2021 um 18:09 schrieb Sérgio Basto
<sergio(a)serjux.com>:
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 15:00 +0000, decathorpe(a)fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> java-maint-sig Meeting on 2021-06-24 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
> At fedora-meeting-2(a)irc.libera.net
>
> The meeting will be about:
> More information available at:
> https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig
>
>
> Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9912/
>
Hello, Sorry I couldn't appear but the meeting happened ? I don't find
any reference ... I'm concerned with (1)
(1)
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
wget https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt -q -O - | grep
"Depending on"
Depending on: HdrHistogram (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks
ago)
Depending on: jakarta-activation (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
weeks ago)
Depending on: jmc (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
Depending on: jmc-core (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
Depending on: owasp-java-encoder (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
weeks ago)
--
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
java-devel mailing list -- java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-devel@lists.fedoraproj...
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
5:06 a.m.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 7:07 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 15:00 +0000, decathorpe(a)fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> java-maint-sig Meeting on 2021-06-24 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
> At fedora-meeting-2(a)irc.libera.net
>
> The meeting will be about:
> More information available at:
> https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig
>
>
> Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9912/
>
Hello, Sorry I couldn't appear but the meeting happened ? I don't find
any reference ... I'm concerned with (1)
Not a problem IMHO.
jakarta-activation has been adopted.
eclipse can easily remove dependency on jmc.
See inline comments below.
(1)
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
wget https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt -q -O - | grep
"Depending on"
Depending on: HdrHistogram (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks
ago)
Only jmc directly depends on HdrHistogram, nothing else.
Depending on: jakarta-activation (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
weeks ago)
jakarta-activation is not orphaned, I already adopted it some time ago.
Depending on: jmc (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
Only eclipse directly depends on jmc. That dependency can be easily removed.
Depending on: jmc-core (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
Only jmc directly depends on jmc-core.
Depending on: owasp-java-encoder (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
weeks ago)
Only jmc and jmc-core directly depend on owasp-java-encoder, nothing else.
--
Sérgio M. B.
7 a.m.
New subject: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : java-maint-sig Meeting
On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 12:06 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 7:07 PM Sérgio Basto
<sergio(a)serjux.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 15:00 +0000,
> decathorpe(a)fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> > java-maint-sig Meeting on 2021-06-24 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00
> > UTC
> > At fedora-meeting-2(a)irc.libera.net
> >
> > The meeting will be about:
> > More information available at:
> > https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig
> >
> >
> > Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9912/
> >
>
> Hello, Sorry I couldn't appear but the meeting happened ? I don't
> find
> any reference ... I'm concerned with (1)
Not a problem IMHO.
jakarta-activation has been adopted.
eclipse can easily remove dependency on jmc.
See inline comments below.
>
>
> (1)
>
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
>
> wget https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt -q -O - | grep
> "Depending on"
>
> Depending on: HdrHistogram (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks
> ago)
Only jmc directly depends on HdrHistogram, nothing else.
> Depending on: jakarta-activation (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
> weeks ago)
jakarta-activation is not orphaned, I already adopted it some time ago.
> Depending on: jmc (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
Only eclipse directly depends on jmc. That dependency can be easily
removed.
> Depending on: jmc-core (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
Only jmc directly depends on jmc-core.
> Depending on: owasp-java-encoder (21), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
> weeks ago)
Only jmc and jmc-core directly depend on owasp-java-encoder, nothing
else.
great, we just need keep eclipse-swt (1) because (2)
(1)
dnf repoquery --whatprovides "mvn(org.eclipse.swt:swt)" --qf "%{repoid}
%{sourcerpm} %{name}"
(2)
openjfx (maintained by: deamn)
openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-5.fc35.src requires mvn(org.eclipse.swt:swt) = 3.116.0.v20210304.1735
openjfx8 (maintained by: deamn)
openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.src requires java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel =
1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35, mvn(org.eclipse.swt:swt) = 3.116.0.v20210304.1735
openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64 requires java-1.8.0-openjdk =
1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35
tuxguitar (maintained by: oget)
tuxguitar-1.5.3-6.fc34.src requires eclipse-swt = 1:4.19-5.fc35
tuxguitar-1.5.3-6.fc34.x86_64 requires eclipse-swt = 1:4.19-5.fc35
java-1.8.0-openjdk (maintained by: ahughes, dbhole, jerboaa, jvanek, michalvala, omajid)
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8(x86-64) =
8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-devel-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires
openjfx8-devel(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-devel-fastdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires
openjfx8-devel(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-devel-slowdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires
openjfx8-devel(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-fastdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires
openjfx8(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-slowdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires
openjfx8(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
java-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.src requires java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel =
1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35
--
Sérgio M. B.
9:11 p.m.
New subject: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : java-maint-sig Meeting
Sorry I misread the repoquery command, eclipse-swt is part of eclipse
package that complicate things ...
On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 13:00 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 12:06 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 7:07 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 15:00 +0000,
> > decathorpe(a)fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> > > java-maint-sig Meeting on 2021-06-24 from 15:00:00 to
> > > 16:00:00
> > > UTC
> > > At fedora-meeting-2(a)irc.libera.net
> > >
> > > The meeting will be about:
> > > More information available at:
> > > https://pagure.io/java-maint-sig
> > >
> > >
> > > Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9912/
> > >
> >
> > Hello, Sorry I couldn't appear but the meeting happened ? I don't
> > find
> > any reference ... I'm concerned with (1)
>
> Not a problem IMHO.
> jakarta-activation has been adopted.
> eclipse can easily remove dependency on jmc.
> See inline comments below.
>
> >
> >
> > (1)
> >
> >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
> >
> > wget https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt -q -O - |
> > grep
> > "Depending on"
> >
> > Depending on: HdrHistogram (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1
> > weeks
> > ago)
>
> Only jmc directly depends on HdrHistogram, nothing else.
>
> > Depending on: jakarta-activation (21), status change: 2021-06-18
> > (1
> > weeks ago)
>
> jakarta-activation is not orphaned, I already adopted it some time
> ago.
>
> > Depending on: jmc (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks ago)
>
> Only eclipse directly depends on jmc. That dependency can be easily
> removed.
>
> > Depending on: jmc-core (38), status change: 2021-06-18 (1 weeks
> > ago)
>
> Only jmc directly depends on jmc-core.
>
> > Depending on: owasp-java-encoder (21), status change: 2021-06-18
> > (1
> > weeks ago)
>
> Only jmc and jmc-core directly depend on owasp-java-encoder,
> nothing
> else.
great, we just need keep eclipse-swt (1) because (2)
(1)
dnf repoquery --whatprovides "mvn(org.eclipse.swt:swt)" --qf
"%{repoid}
%{sourcerpm} %{name}"
(2)
openjfx (maintained by: deamn)
openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-5.fc35.src requires
mvn(org.eclipse.swt:swt) = 3.116.0.v20210304.1735
openjfx8 (maintained by: deamn)
openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.src requires java-1.8.0-openjdk-
devel = 1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35, mvn(org.eclipse.swt:swt) =
3.116.0.v20210304.1735
openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64 requires java-1.8.0-
openjdk = 1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35
tuxguitar (maintained by: oget)
tuxguitar-1.5.3-6.fc34.src requires eclipse-swt = 1:4.19-
5.fc35
tuxguitar-1.5.3-6.fc34.x86_64 requires eclipse-swt = 1:4.19-
5.fc35
java-1.8.0-openjdk (maintained by: ahughes, dbhole, jerboaa, jvanek,
michalvala, omajid)
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64
requires openjfx8(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-devel-1:1.8.0.302.b03-
0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8-devel(x86-64) = 8.0.202-
26.b07.fc34
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-devel-fastdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-
0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8-devel(x86-64) = 8.0.202-
26.b07.fc34
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-devel-slowdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-
0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8-devel(x86-64) = 8.0.202-
26.b07.fc34
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-fastdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-
0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-slowdebug-1:1.8.0.302.b03-
0.1.ea.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx8(x86-64) = 8.0.202-26.b07.fc34
java-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35.src requires
java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel = 1:1.8.0.302.b03-0.1.ea.fc35
--
Sérgio M. B.
9:17 p.m.
New subject: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : java-maint-sig Meeting
On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 12:06 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
Not a problem IMHO.
jakarta-activation has been adopted.
eclipse can easily remove dependency on jmc.
See inline comments below.
Sorry I misread again, eclipse is to stay on fedora ...
--
Sérgio M. B.
1046
days inactive
1058
days old
java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
decathorpe＠fedoraproject.org -
Mikolaj Izdebski -
Peter Boy -
Sérgio Basto