5 p.m.
Hi,
gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/redhat/gcc-4_1-branch-java-merge-20060823 now
contains the trunk -> redhat/gcc-4_1-branch Java merge that I'd like to see go
into FC6test3.
libjava's "make check" passes except for the -O3 StackTrace2 tests:
FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
but these tests also failed on redhat/gcc-4_1-branch before my 2006-08-23 merge.
Andrew, can you take a look at what's causing these failures?
The merge includes the fix for PR13212, which fixes 33 tests that failed on
redhat/gcc-4_1-branch before my 2006-08-23 merge, and will allow you to remove
gcc41-java-pr13212.patch from the SRPM.
I tested the following on i386 Rawhide:
Eclipse
- extssh mode works well, better than pre-merge when
performance was unacceptably slow
gcjwebplugin
- works
Azureus
- works
AWT/Swing
- work much better than pre-merge, more responsive, no crashes
Java2D
- works much better than pre-merge, faster, no crashes
Can we include this merge in the next Rawhide gcc release?
Tom
6:04 p.m.
>>>> "Tom" == Thomas Fitzsimmons
<fitzsim(a)redhat.com> writes:
Tom> gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/redhat/gcc-4_1-branch-java-merge-20060823
Tom> now contains the trunk -> redhat/gcc-4_1-branch Java merge that I'd
Tom> like to see go into FC6test3.
Thanks!
Tom> Azureus
Tom> - works
I merged over Gary's NetworkInterface patch. This fixes an issue
with azureus that was reported on the gcj list.
Tom
5:54 a.m.
Thomas Fitzsimmons writes:
Hi,
gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/redhat/gcc-4_1-branch-java-merge-20060823 now
contains the trunk -> redhat/gcc-4_1-branch Java merge that I'd like to see go
into FC6test3.
libjava's "make check" passes except for the -O3 StackTrace2 tests:
FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
but these tests also failed on redhat/gcc-4_1-branch before my 2006-08-23 merge.
Andrew, can you take a look at what's causing these failures?
I'm having a lot of trouble duplicating this failure. You should give
me access to a box on which this test fails.
Andrew.
6:57 a.m.
Andrew Haley writes:
Thomas Fitzsimmons writes:
> Hi,
>
> gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/redhat/gcc-4_1-branch-java-merge-20060823 now
> contains the trunk -> redhat/gcc-4_1-branch Java merge that I'd like to see
go
> into FC6test3.
>
> libjava's "make check" passes except for the -O3 StackTrace2 tests:
>
> FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 execution - source compiled test
> FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
>
> but these tests also failed on redhat/gcc-4_1-branch before my 2006-08-23 merge.
> Andrew, can you take a look at what's causing these failures?
I'm having a lot of trouble duplicating this failure. You should give
me access to a box on which this test fails.
Got it now.
FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 execution - source compiled test
UNTESTED: StackTrace2 -O3 output - source compiled test
Andrew.
7:33 a.m.
Andrew Haley writes:
Andrew Haley writes:
> Thomas Fitzsimmons writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/redhat/gcc-4_1-branch-java-merge-20060823 now
> > contains the trunk -> redhat/gcc-4_1-branch Java merge that I'd like
to see go
> > into FC6test3.
> >
> > libjava's "make check" passes except for the -O3 StackTrace2
tests:
> >
> > FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 execution - source compiled test
> > FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
> >
> > but these tests also failed on redhat/gcc-4_1-branch before my 2006-08-23
merge.
> > Andrew, can you take a look at what's causing these failures?
>
> I'm having a lot of trouble duplicating this failure. You should give
> me access to a box on which this test fails.
Got it now.
FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 execution - source compiled test
UNTESTED: StackTrace2 -O3 output - source compiled test
Forget it, it's a buggy testcase. In here:
public static void main(String[] args)
{
try
{
a();
}
catch (Exception x)
{
StackTraceElement[] trace = x.getStackTrace();
checkTrace(trace);
}
}
static void a()
{
new Inner();
}
a() gets inlined into main(), so the stacktrace is only three elements
in size:
[Ljava.lang.StackTraceElement;@2aaaae240f78
{
java.lang.StackTraceElement@2aaaaab0b6c0
{
boolean isNative = false,
java.lang.String fileName = "StackTrace2.java",
java.lang.String methodName = "doCrash",
java.lang.String declaringClass = "StackTrace2$Inner",
int lineNumber = 33,
}, java.lang.StackTraceElement@2aaaaab0b690
{
boolean isNative = false,
java.lang.String fileName = "StackTrace2.java",
java.lang.String methodName = "<init>",
java.lang.String declaringClass = "StackTrace2$Inner",
int lineNumber = 28,
}, java.lang.StackTraceElement@2aaaaab0b660
{
boolean isNative = false,
java.lang.String fileName = "StackTrace2.java",
java.lang.String methodName = "main",
java.lang.String declaringClass = "StackTrace2",
int lineNumber = 21,
},
}
It's safe to inline methods within the same class -- they can't have
different protection domains, for example.
Andrew.
6459
days inactive
6459
days old
java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Andrew Haley -
Thomas Fitzsimmons -
Tom Tromey