[Bug 880274] New: license files needed
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880274
Bug ID: 880274
Summary: license files needed
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Version: 7.0
Component: maven-pmd-plugin
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: alee(a)redhat.com
Depends On: 880273
Group: redhat
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #880273 +++
Description of problem:
ASL 2.0 LICENSE and NOTICE files are not installed
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 10 months
[Bug 880269] New: license files needed
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880269
Bug ID: 880269
Summary: license files needed
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Version: 7.1
Component: maven-ear-plugin
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: alee(a)redhat.com
Depends On: 880268
Group: redhat
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #880268 +++
Description of problem:
LICENSE and NOTICE file need to be installed to comply with ASL 2.0 license
(both in main and javadoc subpackage)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 10 months
[Bug 889131] New: [abrt] jpackage-utils-1.7.5-18.1.fc17: zipfile.py:781:_RealGetContents:IOError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889131
Bug ID: 889131
Summary: [abrt] jpackage-utils-1.7.5-18.1.fc17:
zipfile.py:781:_RealGetContents:IOError: [Errno 22]
Invalid argument
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: javapackages-tools
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: mizdebsk(a)redhat.com
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #853759 +++
Version-Release number of selected component:
jpackage-utils-1.7.5-18.1.fc17
Additional info:
libreport version: 2.0.13
abrt_version: 2.0.12
cmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/lib/rpm/osgi.prov
kernel: 3.5.2-3.fc17.x86_64
--- Additional comment from Ilyes Gouta on 2012-09-02 19:45:38 CEST ---
Created attachment 609141
File: backtrace
--- Additional comment from Ilyes Gouta on 2012-09-02 19:45:40 CEST ---
Created attachment 609142
File: core_backtrace
--- Additional comment from Przemek Klosowski on 2012-09-05 17:42:24 CEST ---
rebooted after update, logged into standard Gnome session, got black background
error announcement
Package: jpackage-utils-1.7.5-18.1.fc17
OS Release: Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle)
--- Additional comment from Mikolaj Izdebski on 2012-12-19 19:01:20 CET ---
For me this looks like a bug in python - _RealGetContents from zipfile.py is
calling seek() with invalid argument.
Reassigning to python package.
--- Additional comment from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda on 2012-12-20 09:30:37 CET
---
Notes:
- Although the error is raised in _RealGetContents, the actual problem seems to
be in zipfile.is_zipfile, which wrongly returns True for /usr/bin/fastjar
(normal binary).
- Reproduce:
-- yum install libgcj, that provides /usr/bin/fastjar
-- # the following line should print False, but prints True
-- python -c "import zipfile; print zipfile.is_zipfile('/usr/bin/fastjar')"
- The core of the problem seems to be in fact, that stringEndArchive
("PK\005\006") is found in the file.
Reported upstream as http://bugs.python.org/issue16735
--- Additional comment from Stanislav Ochotnicky on 2012-12-20 09:38:41 CET ---
Part of the problem is that osgi.prov should have never been called on that
binary because it doesn't end with ".jar". Quick look doesn't tell me why it
was called because we have this in osgi.attr (rpm auto-requires/provides
generator):
%__osgi_provides %{_rpmconfigdir}/osgi.prov
#%__osgi_requires %{_rpmconfigdir}/osgi.req
%__osgi_path ^(.*\.jar|((%{_libdir}|%{_datadir}).*/MANIFEST.MF))
Note that third line has correctly escaped dot before jar
--- Additional comment from Mikolaj Izdebski on 2012-12-20 10:39:24 CET ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Note that third line has correctly escaped dot before jar
I think there needs to be double escaping - one for rpm and one for glibc.
--- Additional comment from Mikolaj Izdebski on 2012-12-20 10:57:39 CET ---
Created attachment 666574
Reproducer
Reproduce with: rpmbuild -ba foo.spec
--- Additional comment from Mikolaj Izdebski on 2012-12-20 11:08:07 CET ---
Fixed upstream:
http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/javapackages.git/commit/?id=5a855c8b189a...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=F2JO9FI4ut&a=cc_unsubscribe
9 years, 11 months
[Bug 1074674] New: enable easymock module
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074674
Bug ID: 1074674
Summary: enable easymock module
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: powermock
Severity: medium
Assignee: rkennke(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pmackinn(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jerboaa(a)gmail.com, neugens(a)redhat.com,
rkennke(a)redhat.com
$ rpm -q easymock
easymock-3.2-2.fc21.noarch
The latest version of powermock in rawhide appears to build with the latest
version of easymock.
Without the api/pom.xml patch:
[INFO] powermock ......................................... SUCCESS [13.682s]
[INFO] powermock-reflect ................................. SUCCESS [8.658s]
[INFO] powermock-core .................................... SUCCESS [7.167s]
[INFO] powermock-api ..................................... SUCCESS [0.031s]
[INFO] powermock-api-support ............................. SUCCESS [3.025s]
[INFO] powermock-api-easymock ............................ SUCCESS [4.883s]
[INFO] powermock-api-mockito ............................. SUCCESS [4.806s]
[INFO] powermock-modules ................................. SUCCESS [0.013s]
<snip>
./api/easymock/target/powermock-api-easymock-1.4.12.jar
./api/easymock/target/powermock-api-easymock-1.4.12-javadoc.jar
./api/easymock/target/powermock-api-easymock-1.4.12-sources.jar
Please consider enabling this module and providing a sub-package for same.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DN5dNpksMe&a=cc_unsubscribe
9 years, 11 months
[Bug 1062290] New: Package upstream apache-commons-collection release 4.0
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062290
Bug ID: 1062290
Summary: Package upstream apache-commons-collection release 4.0
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: apache-commons-collections
Assignee: jcapik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rrati(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jcapik(a)redhat.com, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com,
msrb(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
The apache-commons-collection library has been updated to release 4.0. We
should look at packaging this new version.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2ioH1ZKvIc&a=cc_unsubscribe
9 years, 11 months