https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280159 --- Comment #2 from Timothy St. Clair <tstclair(a)redhat.com&gt; --- You meant epel7 branch vs. el7 branch. b/c el7 branch would mean fully supported through rhel ;-) FWIW I started down this road a while back, here were my last notes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177055#c10 Current missing dep-graph for zk rebuild on epel7: Error: No Package found for checkstyle Error: No Package found for ivy-local Error: No Package found for jdiff Error: No Package found for jtoaster Error: No Package found for netty -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WzRR18L1kG&a=cc_unsubscribe

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280159 --- Comment #3 from Christopher Tubbs <ctubbsii-fedora(a)apache.org&gt; --- Yeah, I assumed EL7 was being used here as shorthand for EPEL7 (since that's all that is directly supported by Fedora for EL). If the originator intended to mean RHEL7, not EPEL7, then I don't think this issue is applicable to the Fedora community. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uTKwnu8N3w&a=cc_unsubscribe

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280159 Arun S A G <sagarun(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sagarun(a)gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Arun S A G <sagarun(a)gmail.com&gt; --- We need el7 branch for checkstyle https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/checkstyle/ jdiff https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/jdiff/ netty https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/netty/ ivy-local doesn't exist in fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mCJt7tbK2N&a=cc_unsubscribe

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280159 --- Comment #7 from Arun S A G <sagarun(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Christ, What about ivy-local? Is that something we need to package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=TC1WL1GeIi&a=cc_unsubscribe

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280159 Ethan Tuttle <ethan(a)ethantuttle.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ethan(a)ethantuttle.com | nalmond(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nalmond(a)redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ReohHeMOkl&a=cc_unsubscribe

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280159 Alan Pevec <apevec(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|zookeeper |zookeeper Version|23 |epel7 Product|Fedora |Fedora EPEL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wnwn6J7ydC&a=cc_unsubscribe

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280159 --- Comment #14 from Christopher Tubbs <ctubbsii-fedora(a)apache.org&gt; --- Definitely not an expert, especially when it comes to ant/ivy, so any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for setting up the etherpad shared doc. I've made some updates to it. Anything useful we flesh out there which is not already reflected here should be noted here for posterity. As BZs are filed for the dependencies, we can make them block this ticket, too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vphPaDARxA&a=cc_unsubscribe

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280159 Tristan Cacqueray <tdecacqu(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tdecacqu(a)redhat.com --- Comment #16 from Tristan Cacqueray <tdecacqu(a)redhat.com&gt; --- Hello folks, I've tried to port the f25 spec down to epel7 without success either... It's a never ending string of dependencies, which at some point starts to conflict too much with what is available on centos7. I stopped at the objectweb-asm which doesn't seems compatible with java-1.8. Anyway centos7 does have all the requirements to build a lightweight zookeeper.jar, e.g. not including javadoc, binding, clients or netty, just a bare minimal zookeeper.jar, which seems enough to work as a DLM for openstack. So I have been working on a zookeeper-lite-distgit that I'd like to use for nodepool/zuulv3 integration testing in the context of the software factory project: https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/6550 I don't know if it's acceptable to rewrite a package in such a way, but if this can be included in epel7, I'd be happy to submit this zookeeper-lite package (assuming the resulting zookeeper.jar works and the package is acceptable regarding to fedora guidelines). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280159 --- Comment #18 from Tristan Cacqueray <tdecacqu(a)redhat.com&gt; --- (In reply to Christopher Tubbs from comment #17) Hi Christopher, I had a hard time figuring out where epel7 branch were being worked on and what are the workarounds... Would you mind adding blocker for this ticket so that it's easier to follow? And is there a repository collecting the current specs and workaround for epel7? It means Distributed Lock Manager, which seems like the use case for zookeeper in openstack. Well I have little to no experience in java packaging, and this was just an attempt at getting the ball rolling... A proper zookeeper package would be better. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280159 Alan Pevec <apevec(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apevec(a)redhat.com --- Comment #20 from Alan Pevec <apevec(a)redhat.com&gt; --- it's in Software Factory repos: https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/gitweb?p=scl/zuul-distgit.git;a=tree... This one is using SCL python35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.