6:42 a.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
Bug ID: 1346811
Summary: Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not
otherwise
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: hibernate
Assignee: puntogil(a)libero.it
Reporter: poc(a)usb.ve
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
puntogil(a)libero.it
Created attachment 1168334
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1168334&action=edit
Section of journal showing hibernation failure
Description of problem:
On selecting Hibernate from the KDE menu when Google Chrome is running, the
screen blanks for a few seconds and then comes back up as before. If Chrome is
not running, the system hibernates correctly (and restores correctly).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-4.4.9-300.fc23.x86_64
google-chrome-stable-51.0.2704.84-1.x86_64
systemd-222-14.fc23.x86_64
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run Chrome
2. Select Hibernate from KDE menu
Actual results:
Screen blanks, then returns to normal.
Expected results:
System hibernates.
Additional info:
The first time this happened, journalctl showed an error (see attachment), but
on subsequent occasions there is nothing related to hibernation, just many
SElinux violations for Chrome. However these have been going on for months now
with no obvious effect, while the present bug started only on a recent system
update.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:18 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> ---
This is a Java package.
What has that to do with the issues reported?
Nothing.
Please, select the correct component.
This bug will be closed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:18 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:19 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed| |2016-06-15 08:19:18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:22 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rdieter(a)math.unl.edu
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> ---
If I recall correctly too, this is a chrome feature, to inhibit sleep/shutdown
if there are active downloads.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:29 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> ---
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #2)
If I recall correctly too, this is a chrome feature, to inhibit
sleep/shutdown if there are active downloads.
Sorry, this is not the right component.
This library provides "object/relational persistence and query service for
Java"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:32 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
--- Comment #4 from Patrick O'Callaghan <poc(a)usb.ve> ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3)
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #2)
> If I recall correctly too, this is a chrome feature, to inhibit
> sleep/shutdown if there are active downloads.
Sorry, this is not the right component.
This library provides "object/relational persistence and query service for
Java"
In that case I would appreciate a pointer to what would be the correct
component. Since it's unclear exactly what is failing, I simply searched for
"hibernate" in the bug reporting tool and got this. Apologies if that's
wrong.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:34 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment|0 |1
#1168334 is| |
obsolete| |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:35 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
--- Comment #5 from Patrick O'Callaghan <poc(a)usb.ve> ---
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #2)
If I recall correctly too, this is a chrome feature, to inhibit
sleep/shutdown if there are active downloads.
I've been using Chrome for years and hibernation for several months now, but
this has never happened before. However, best leave discussion to whatever is
the correct component.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:39 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> ---
(In reply to Patrick O'Callaghan from comment #4)
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3)
> (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #2)
> > If I recall correctly too, this is a chrome feature, to inhibit
> > sleep/shutdown if there are active downloads.
>
> Sorry, this is not the right component.
> This library provides "object/relational persistence and query service for
> Java"
In that case I would appreciate a pointer to what would be the correct
component. Since it's unclear exactly what is failing, I simply searched for
"hibernate" in the bug reporting tool and got this. Apologies if that's
wrong.
run "locate hibernate"
after run "rpm -qf /usr/sbin/pm-hibernate"
maybe could help for the next time
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:48 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
--- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> ---
correct component would be "chrome" (not in fedora)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:57 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> ---
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #7)
correct component would be "chrome" (not in fedora)
then this bug is useless
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
--- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> ---
Yes it is, though as mentioned, I suspect this is a feature not a bug (in
chrome)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:12 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> ---
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #9)
Yes it is, though as mentioned, I suspect this is a feature not a bug
(in
chrome)
Take a look here, if you are not aware:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:38 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
--- Comment #11 from Patrick O'Callaghan <poc(a)usb.ve> ---
I do understand that Chrome is not a Fedora component. I reported the bug
because I didn't realise that a non-privileged process could inhibit
hibernation (the fact that it was Chrome wasn't really the point). I'm still
somewhat surprised at that, but if it's system policy then there's nothing to
be done. However the journal message quoted earlier doesn't say anything about
policy, it reports the non-hibernation as a failure with no explanation.
I'll report this under systemd, which is where it should probably go.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:43 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
--- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> ---
if you click on the plasma powermanagement/battery applet, it should display
all current/active inhibitors.
other examples of where this inhibitor feature can be used:
media players: you don't want your computer to go to sleep with playing a
video, for example
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:55 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1346811] Hibernation fails when Google Chrome is running, not otherwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346811
--- Comment #13 from Patrick O'Callaghan <poc(a)usb.ve> ---
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #12)
if you click on the plasma powermanagement/battery applet, it should
display
all current/active inhibitors.
I haven't been using that since this is a desktop system with no battery. I'll
check it out.
other examples of where this inhibitor feature can be used:
media players: you don't want your computer to go to sleep with playing a
video, for example
I understand that, however there's a difference between automatic power-saving
and deliberate hibernation. If I use a manual control to hibernate the system I
actually want it to turn off.
In any case, I reported this under:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346908
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2933
days inactive
2933
days old
java-sig-commits@lists.fedoraproject.org
16 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Red Hat Bugzilla