On 08/04/17 01:06, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> Just an observation and to discuss the slow booting of Kde/Plasma/Linux
> these days.
>
> On a laptop I have, a Thinkpad T410, i5 4 core 2.6GHz, 4G RAM, Spinning
> 1 TByte 7200rpm disk (110 MBytes/s sequential reed speed) I get the
> following rough figures:
>
> Windows7 to login screen: 24s
> Windows7 from login screen to desktop: 10s
> Windows7 overall: 34s
>
> Fedora25/KDE to login screen: 50s (1:46 when updatedb runs)
> Fedora25/KDE from login screen to desktop: 50s
> Fedora25/KDE overall: 1:40 (-> 2:36 when updatedb is running)
>
> I get similar but slightly faster speeds on desktop i5 systems, again
> with spinning disks. SSD systems I have are faster (It does seem to be
> disk bound) but still not that quick.
>
> It is starting to get noticeable/an issue these days and getting
> embarrassing when going to meetings with a Linux Laptop !
>
> Once Fedora25/KDE its running it is quite snappy, unless there is disk
> activity going on in the background when some things can lockup awaiting
> disk (why should desktop code be so disk reliant ?)
>
> I know disk readahead is no longer present which doesn't help, but it
> does seem that the code in general, and KDE/Plasma specifically appears
> to be getting a bit bloated and disk bound. Of the 50s to login screen
> 23s appears to be due to sddm (not sure on that). Could this be due to
> more extensive usage of things like QtQuick (QtSlow !) ?
>
> Ok, I can buy a SSD, disable updatedb (but why does this start during
> boot quite often ?), change to a different desktop and/or suspend to
> mem/disk but really the system shouldn't be this slow and probably power
> consuming. Oh for the days of KDE 3 :)
> (An ancient Thinkpad 600E, Mobile Pentium II 363 MHz, 228 MBytes RAM
> running Fedora6 and KDE 3 system takes 21 s from login screen to KDE 3
> desktop (Ok Linux boot to login is a bit slow on that one at about 1:10)).
>
> Does anyone in the know think that this performance aspect may improve
> or get worse as the KDE/Plasma 5 series is developed ?
>
> Terry
> _______________________________________________
> kde mailing list -- kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to kde-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
When it comes to Windows, make sure you are comparing windows with fast
boot or cold boot. There is a big difference I have seen. I know
yesterday on a laptop. KDE live USB was a much faster boot than Windows
from it's internal drive.
Now the login is another issue. I find KDE login is slow on my older
machines, slower than it used to be.
FWIWdmes
systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 2.072s (kernel) + 14.811s (initrd) + 40.174s
(userspace) = 57.059s
AMD FX(tm)-8320 Eight-Core Processor
Slower HDD'
Another machine F24
Startup finished in 1min 10.623s (firmware) + 5.244s (loader) + 9.764s
(kernel) + 35.582s (initrd) + 13.769s (userspace) = 2min 14.982s
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5930K CPU @ 3.50GHz
ssd HDD
This machine motherboard is slow to boot as it does some checks when
powering on and I don't know if that is part of the startup timing. I
will have to check with a watch one of these days.
Both machines have bios passwords and system encryption passwords.
From what I have heard, from cold boot, Windows 10 is slower on this
machine and runs slower.
Still, the time I press enter to login till KDE desktop is ready to use
seems to be slower.