On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 19:33 +0100, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
Dne Tuesday 27. of January 2009 19:26:13 Linuxguy123 napsal(a):
> On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 17:06 +0000, José Matos wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 16:52:28 Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > > I knew that... I was hoping someone had an inside scoop or reason why
> > > its the way it is.
> >
> > Several of us have (probably) some ideas why that has happened, on the
> > other hand your preamble will turn us way from giving any kind of answer.
> >
> > For example what do you understand as a real browser? Do (e)links, lynx
> > or dillo (among others) qualify? If the they don't qualify why are there
> > users using them to browse the net?
> >
> > If you define a real browser as browser that deals with all the pages,
> > then I am sorry but there aren't any. No single browser deals with all
> > pages (imagine those IE-only pages, as an example) so there are no real
> > browsers. QED.
>
> When will Konqueror work as well as Firefox does as far as handling
> webpages without errors ?
I think José explained quite well your twisted perception of how the "real"
browser should look like. I for one know of many webpages that work correctly
in Konqueror but fail miserably in Firefox; guess why? Because these pages
were designed for IE only
OK, well here is an example page that Konqueror does not handle
properly:
http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2009-01-27-015-35-IN-KE
I assume that Linux Today wouldn't write web pages that are "IE only".
The problem my konqueror has with this page is that it displays what
looks like a title bar incorrectly in the middle of the page. "Events
Blogs, Jobs, Partners...Search"
And the "Complete Story" link doesn't work.
So... I right click-> Open As... open it in Firefox and read the
story.
If you don't believe me, I'd be happy to send a screen shot.
$ rpm -q kdebase
kdebase-4.1.4-2.fc10.i386
$ rpm -q kdelibs
kdelibs-4.1.4-2.fc10.i386