On Tuesday 03 February 2009 16:49:48 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 15:32:03 Rex Dieter wrote:
> Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > The guidelines seem to indicate first things need to get passed and
> > after they pass I can ask for sponsorship.
>
> Though, the usual procedure is that your first reviewer is usually your
> sponsor. Doing these in parallel is ok too.
>
> I'd be happy for Jaroslav (or other) do a first review here, and once
> most review issues are sorted out, I (or another sponsor) give things a
> final review before approving the pkg(s) and sponsoring you.
Ok, I'm reviewing it right now, it's better to do it asap because later we
can forgot about this packages. Still waiting for Lukas'es kio_sysinfo
review ;-) I'll ping you when we sort out issues and we have package in
good shape. The first one - I hate Cashew is really easy to review but the
second one brings again flags issue :(
Jaroslav
> Have you created a FAS account yet? If not, please do so... we could
> even forgo the wait on reviews.
>
I've got a Fedora account. The instructions on how to ask to be sponsored are
not at all clear. It provides no navigation at all other than where there are
a list of sponsores.
Jaroslav.
I type rpmlint -i ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/kde-plasma
ihatethecashew-0.2b-3.fc10.src.rpm and get
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
I type rpmlint -c ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.spec and get...
huh?
usage: rpmlint.py [<options>] <rpm files|specfile>
options in:
[-i|--info]
[-I <error,error,>]
[-c|--check <check>]
[-a|--all]
[-C|--checkdir <checkdir>]
[-h|--help]
[-v|--verbose]
[-E|--extractdir <dir>]
[-p|--profile]
[-V|--version]
[-n|--noexception]
[-f|--file <config file to use instead of ~/.rpmlintrc>]
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.