While I'm not a SIG member, may I suggest that
a.) Nepomuk will be dropped in favor of Baloo and
b.) Post announcements via the usual channels (
http://fedoramagazine.org ,
Google+, Facebook, etc.) that an update will be released and explain that the
index will be recreated / converted and that this may take a while.
We did the same back in the day when Nepomuk 2.0 succeeded 1.x in the official
kde.org announcement, resulting in IIRC zero "Nepomuk got buggy and eats CPU"
complaints. <
http://kde.org/announcements/4.11/platform.php>
Markus
On Monday 23 June 2014 11:11:41 Rex Dieter wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
> On 06/22/2014 07:20 PM, Markus Slopianka wrote:
>> Hi.
>> Not sure why it seems to happen with every update but once again
>> kde-workspace 4.11.10 tries to install Nepomuk. ;-)
>>
>> Is there anything we can do to help fix this?
>
> it's just that the nepomuk-free kde-workspace build from kde-unstable
> got superceded by a recent update:
>
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7457/kde-workspace-4.1
> 1.10-2.fc20
>
> We have concrete plans to start work on brining kde-4.13.x to f20
> officially, but I guess we haven't decided on how best to deal with the
> nepomuk transition yet (ie, whether remove nepomuk-related deps from
> core kde packages or not).
OK, kde-sig members, please add your opinion this topic ^^.
I think I'm of a mind to removing optional nepomuk-related deps when
kde-4.13.x lands, since
* baloo migrates old nepomuk data
* nepomukserver no longer runs, so the related features don't really work
anymore (afaik).
-- Rex
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from
http://userbase.kde.org