Am 17.01.19 um 00:39 schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:17:01AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> How about forever? We still maintain qt3 and I backport security fixes to
>> it. Why can't that be done for python2?
> because it's just a waste of time
Hey, if someone thinks it's worth doing, why get upset? One person's waste
of time is another person's responsibility, good deed, or fun
well, it just would be better invested by port teh code to the nwer
version but on the other hand i couldn't c are less about python
especially after months with no usable stable kernel while patches at
least are ready since 2018-12-28 which really opens the question of
priorities given that 4.19 will be LTS and was excatly the version
released withinin Linus break and with the scheduler-corruption
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659706
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202065
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202013
frankly how can one fuckup a component like iptables that way and not
fix it while the latest usaebale kernel is 4.18.20 (a Fedora 27 build
because 4.19 on F18 was way to early rebased even if that bug wouldn't
exist because the filesystem corruption at that moment was already known)