Rex Dieter wrote: I agree with Rex too... It's good to send these out to not just Fedora-KDE Lists, but other distro KDE Lists too.. Allen Zhu Webmaster/IT Digital Clubhouse Network allen.jaloola(a)gmail.com On 1/23/09, Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu&gt; wrote: > > Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > > Oh, and if these type of email is unwanted on this list, let me know, > > and i won't do it again. > > > -- Rex > > _______________________________________________ > fedora-kde mailing list > fedora-kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde >

On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Eli Wapniarski <eli(a)orbsky.homelinux.org&gt; wrote: Where are you using the Kmail 4? On F9, I still have Kmail 3.5. I find the interface fairly cluttered. -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com )

Now... If KDE would refocus some attention on Konqueror at least as the magnificent browser it used to be, I would be very happy. Eli -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

On Saturday 24 January 2009 10:34:07 Arthur Pemberton wrote: plugin issues. It not that these sites don't get tested, its that after they're tested, and the browser not being condusive to real world application, the best that can be hoped for is wait until the bugs are fixed, test again, and if the browser is working then keep using it. If not... well then Konqueror usage will fall by the wayside. If the browser is unusuable and remains so because of neglect, then you will see fewer and fewer people using the browser. Don't you think? I've said this over and over and over again. Most users use computers. They are not QA technicians for developement houses, nor should anyone expect them to be so. A few of us take Open Source seriously and do our best to participate. But most people do not have the time or inclination. They just want the OS and applications that they use to work. If it doesn't they move on. Konqueror is rather quickly falling by the wayside which is terribly unfortunate. These are just the bugs that I've posted and continue to monitor, and there must quite a number more. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106367 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157440 (This one also will affect the Web Interface for Kollab). https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157481 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157483 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172534 Eli -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

On Saturday 24 January 2009 01:08:56 Eli Wapniarski wrote: Interesting...I was going to post about how sluggish Kmail had become for me; this happens when I go from folder to folder, particularly a large folder with lots of messages like my Fedora-list or even this one; at bottom left of the window, you can see that kmail is doing some sort of indexing and you can watch the numbers go up as it counts various things - and all this has to occur before a message is displayed; previously, I would hit the key to go to next message when I was on the last message in a folder, it would advance to the first unread message in the next folder, and the message would almost be instantaneously displayed - now there's a very large pause - on Fedora-list which has around 7000 messages in it at any given time (I have it set to delete after 90 days), this can take 13 seconds (I just measured it).... -- Claude Jones Brunswick, MD

On Saturday 24 January 2009 10:51:47 Anne Wilson wrote: For me, it's every time - first it says it's processing messages, then threads, then groups. Once the numbers count down, the message I'm trying to read appears. I went into System Settings/Akonadi Configuration and clicked on the 'Test' button and I got a list that contained some errors - one said 'My Sequel Server Log Contains Errors'; If I clicked on the error this appeared: "The MySQL server error log file '/home/cj/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql.err' contains errors." and opening that, I found a great list, which in part contained the following: ****************************************************** InnoDB: using the same InnoDB data or log files. InnoDB: Unable to lock ./ibdata1, error: 11 InnoDB: Check that you do not already have another mysqld process InnoDB: using the same InnoDB data or log files. 090118 22:34:47 InnoDB: Unable to open the first data file InnoDB: Error in opening ./ibdata1 090118 22:34:47 InnoDB: Operating system error number 11 in a file operation. InnoDB: Error number 11 means 'Resource temporarily unavailable'. InnoDB: Some operating system error numbers are described at InnoDB: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/operating-system-error- codes.html InnoDB: Could not open or create data files. InnoDB: If you tried to add new data files, and it failed here, InnoDB: you should now edit innodb_data_file_path in my.cnf back InnoDB: to what it was, and remove the new ibdata files InnoDB created InnoDB: in this failed attempt. InnoDB only wrote those files full of InnoDB: zeros, but did not yet use them in any way. But be careful: do not InnoDB: remove old data files which contain your precious data! 090118 22:34:47 [ERROR] Default storage engine (InnoDB) is not available 090118 22:34:47 [ERROR] Aborting 090118 22:34:47 [Note] /usr/libexec/mysqld: Shutdown complete ******************************************************** These are dated several days back, so I don't know if they're relevant to my issue, but, does anyone know what they mean? -- Claude Jones Brunswick, MD