11:55 p.m.
Hi Rex.
Any chance to get the "I Hate the Cashew" plasmoid at
http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/I+HATE+the+Cashew?content=91009
included?
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
2:30 a.m.
Hi,
Have a look at:
http://floriansievert.de/linux/repo/f10/unstable/i386/
The newest version seems to run fine with KDE 4.2 from kde-testing. I
just noticed that the specs hadn't been updated from me, but I will do
it afternoon. Maybe this helps ...
Best regards,
Florian
2:39 a.m.
On Saturday 31 January 2009 10:30:47 Florian Sievert wrote:
Hi,
> http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/I+HATE+the+Cashew?content=91009
> included?
Have a look at:
http://floriansievert.de/linux/repo/f10/unstable/i386/
The newest version seems to run fine with KDE 4.2 from kde-testing. I
just noticed that the specs hadn't been updated from me, but I will do
it afternoon. Maybe this helps ...
Thanks for the info.
I've installed the plasmoid manually and I confirm that it does indeed work.
The repo mentioned will very useful for i386 users. My desktop computer is
x86_64 (oh well).
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
3:17 a.m.
Hi,
I've installed the plasmoid manually and I confirm that it does
indeed work.
The repo mentioned will very useful for i386 users. My desktop computer is
x86_64 (oh well).
In fact, I am also build 64bit-Builds, however lots of issues went
broken during the last time and my time is currently very limited. The
i386-build that starts to work are quite new also and I am working on
getting 64bit back again. Maybe even this weekend. However, my real
intention was not to move you to my testing repository ;) This package
is quite simple and I might mind to maintain it officially. Want to get
into it a while again, but during my thesis I cannot garuantee that I am
able to work on it frequently. However ihatethecashew was updated twice
a half year ... ;)
Best regards,
Florian
3:25 a.m.
On Saturday 31 January 2009 11:17:59 Florian Sievert wrote:
Hi,
> I've installed the plasmoid manually and I confirm that it does indeed
> work. The repo mentioned will very useful for i386 users. My desktop
> computer is x86_64 (oh well).
In fact, I am also build 64bit-Builds, however lots of issues went
broken during the last time and my time is currently very limited. The
i386-build that starts to work are quite new also and I am working on
getting 64bit back again. Maybe even this weekend. However, my real
intention was not to move you to my testing repository ;) This package
is quite simple and I might mind to maintain it officially. Want to get
into it a while again, but during my thesis I cannot garuantee that I am
able to work on it frequently. However ihatethecashew was updated twice
a half year ... ;)
Good luck on your thesis. Really. Take care of that first. If you consider it
like taking a break then certainly let us know when the 64 bit repo is backup.
I for one, would be very happy to see select kde-look stuff built for Fedora.
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
8:20 a.m.
Eli Wapniarski wrote:
Any chance to get the "I Hate the Cashew" plasmoid at
http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/I+HATE+the+Cashew?content=91009
included?
Package it (or adopt Florian's existing package) and submit it for review...
Kevin Kofler
12:22 p.m.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> Any chance to get the "I Hate the Cashew" plasmoid at
> http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/I+HATE+the+Cashew?content=91009
> included?
Package it (or adopt Florian's existing package) and submit it for review...
Kevin Kofler
Eli,
I was going to say similar myself, us freeloaders are going to have to
lend a hand with so many possible plasmoids. If I find one that I
like, I'll try my hand at packaging it.
--
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )
1:30 p.m.
On Saturday 31 January 2009 20:22:02 Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Kevin Kofler
<kevin.kofler(a)chello.at>
wrote:
> Eli Wapniarski wrote:
>> Any chance to get the "I Hate the Cashew" plasmoid at
>> http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/I+HATE+the+Cashew?content=91009
>> included?
>
> Package it (or adopt Florian's existing package) and submit it for
> review...
>
> Kevin Kofler
Eli,
I was going to say similar myself, us freeloaders are going to have to
lend a hand with so many possible plasmoids. If I find one that I
like, I'll try my hand at packaging it.
I was thinking the same thing myself. But, I only have resources to be able to
test things on Fedora version I currently have installed on my computer. And
even if I did have the resources to test on 5 different platforms plus 3
others in developemnt, I'm not really sure that I would have the time to
reliably do the qa needed to ensure everything is working as development
progresses. If Florian finds the time to get x86_64 packages available and
lets everyone know that its up and running I will certainly be getting it from
there.
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
2:17 p.m.
2009/1/31 Eli Wapniarski <eli(a)orbsky.homelinux.org>
I was thinking the same thing myself. But, I only have resources to be able
to
test things on Fedora version I currently have installed on my computer.
And
This is not such an issue as mock can build packages for multiple versions
of Fedora on the same machine. Thats what i do quite successfully. As for
other architectures koji can build on all the available versions and
architectures that Fedora supports.
even if I did have the resources to test on 5 different platforms
plus 3
others in developemnt,
Most of the rest of us dont have machines for all the versions and platforms
available. We test what we can and the rest we have to rely on feedback.
I'm not really sure that I would have the time to reliably do the
qa needed
to ensure everything is working as development progresses.
Time is indeed the biggest issue. The good news is most of the simpler
packages are quite easy to package once and then just occasionally do fixes,
updates or rebuilds to cope with incompatibilities/upstream updates. Good
thing with plasma applets are they are for the most part not required by
other parts of the system so failure in an applet should only affect the
applet itself.
[...]
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and
those who don't...
11:16 p.m.
On Saturday 31 January 2009 22:17:15 John5342 wrote:
2009/1/31 Eli Wapniarski <eli(a)orbsky.homelinux.org>
> I was thinking the same thing myself. But, I only have resources to be
> able to
> test things on Fedora version I currently have installed on my computer.
> And
This is not such an issue as mock can build packages for multiple versions
of Fedora on the same machine. Thats what i do quite successfully. As for
other architectures koji can build on all the available versions and
architectures that Fedora supports.
> even if I did have the resources to test on 5 different platforms plus 3
> others in developemnt,
Most of the rest of us dont have machines for all the versions and
platforms available. We test what we can and the rest we have to rely on
feedback.
> I'm not really sure that I would have the time to reliably do the qa
> needed to ensure everything is working as development progresses.
Time is indeed the biggest issue. The good news is most of the simpler
packages are quite easy to package once and then just occasionally do
fixes, updates or rebuilds to cope with incompatibilities/upstream updates.
Good thing with plasma applets are they are for the most part not required
by other parts of the system so failure in an applet should only affect the
applet itself.
OK... If somebody would point me to the documentation regarding what's
involved, I will certainly look it over and consider it.
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
11:58 a.m.
2009/2/1 Eli Wapniarski <eli(a)orbsky.homelinux.org>
OK... If somebody would point me to the documentation regarding
what's
involved, I will certainly look it over and consider it.
Virtually all the documentation for becoming a package maintainer is located
at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers
The most relevant section to you is probably:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
which also includes links to further help on each step.
The kde-plasma-* packages at
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/should give you a good idea
of how to create a plasma applet package.
I haven't specifically spoken to anyone but I am confident someone in the
KDE group can look after the sponsorship aspect.
Dont get put off by the sheer size of the instructions. Once you done it
once you soon get the hang of it. There is also lots of help available on
mailing lists and irc if you need it.
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and
those who don't...
1:35 p.m.
On Sunday 01 February 2009 19:58:56 John5342 wrote:
2009/2/1 Eli Wapniarski <eli(a)orbsky.homelinux.org>
> OK... If somebody would point me to the documentation regarding what's
> involved, I will certainly look it over and consider it.
Virtually all the documentation for becoming a package maintainer is
located at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers
The most relevant section to you is probably:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
which also includes links to further help on each step.
The kde-plasma-* packages at
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/should give you a good idea
of how to create a plasma applet package.
I haven't specifically spoken to anyone but I am confident someone in the
KDE group can look after the sponsorship aspect.
Dont get put off by the sheer size of the instructions. Once you done it
once you soon get the hang of it. There is also lots of help available on
mailing lists and irc if you need it.
Thanks for the info.
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
3:03 a.m.
On Saturday 31 of January 2009 06:55:10 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
Hi Rex.
Any chance to get the "I Hate the Cashew" plasmoid at
http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/I+HATE+the+Cashew?content=91009
included?
Eli
Hi Eli,
now when we have 4.2 I think we can import more plasma applets to official
Fedora repositories - Plasma ABI should be stable now. I'd like to do it, best
way I think is to use Florian's SPECs, check/review them and merge to Fedora
repositories. As he replied here - he's busy now and I totally understand that
- there are more important things than Plasma - "I hate the Cashew" confirms
it ;-)
Florian, Kevin - any objections regarding this?
Jaroslav
PS: I like Cashew!
--
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik(a)redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 731 455 332
Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/
1:37 p.m.
On Monday 02 February 2009 11:03:10 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Saturday 31 of January 2009 06:55:10 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> Hi Rex.
>
> Any chance to get the "I Hate the Cashew" plasmoid at
>
> http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/I+HATE+the+Cashew?content=91009
>
> included?
>
> Eli
Hi Eli,
now when we have 4.2 I think we can import more plasma applets to official
Fedora repositories - Plasma ABI should be stable now. I'd like to do it,
best way I think is to use Florian's SPECs, check/review them and merge to
Fedora repositories. As he replied here - he's busy now and I totally
understand that - there are more important things than Plasma - "I hate the
Cashew" confirms it ;-)
Florian, Kevin - any objections regarding this?
Jaroslav
PS: I like Cashew!
:)
I've started working on this. It'll take me a little while to get familiar
with everything. I already know that my SPEC file works on Fedora 10 i386 and
x86_64. But, I want to look up a couple of things.
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
5:28 a.m.
On Monday 02 February 2009 20:37:34 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2009 11:03:10 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Saturday 31 of January 2009 06:55:10 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > Hi Rex.
> >
> > Any chance to get the "I Hate the Cashew" plasmoid at
> >
> > http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/I+HATE+the+Cashew?content=9100
> >9
> >
> > included?
> >
>
Don't hesitate to ask me if you need some help!
Jaroslav
Eli
>
> Hi Eli,
> now when we have 4.2 I think we can import more plasma applets to
> official Fedora repositories - Plasma ABI should be stable now. I'd like
> to do it, best way I think is to use Florian's SPECs, check/review them
> and merge to Fedora repositories. As he replied here - he's busy now and
> I totally understand that - there are more important things than Plasma -
> "I hate the Cashew" confirms it ;-)
>
> Florian, Kevin - any objections regarding this?
>
> Jaroslav
>
> PS: I like Cashew!
>
:)
I've started working on this. It'll take me a little while to get familiar
with everything. I already know that my SPEC file works on Fedora 10 i386
and x86_64. But, I want to look up a couple of things. Eli
6:30 a.m.
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 13:28:58 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Monday 02 February 2009 20:37:34 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> On Monday 02 February 2009 11:03:10 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Saturday 31 of January 2009 06:55:10 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > > Hi Rex.
> > >
> > > Any chance to get the "I Hate the Cashew" plasmoid at
> > >
> > > http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/I+HATE+the+Cashew?content=91
> > >00 9
> > >
> > > included?
> > >
> > > Eli
> >
> > Hi Eli,
> > now when we have 4.2 I think we can import more plasma applets to
> > official Fedora repositories - Plasma ABI should be stable now. I'd
> > like to do it, best way I think is to use Florian's SPECs, check/review
> > them and merge to Fedora repositories. As he replied here - he's busy
> > now and I totally understand that - there are more important things
> > than Plasma - "I hate the Cashew" confirms it ;-)
> >
> > Florian, Kevin - any objections regarding this?
> >
> > Jaroslav
> >
> > PS: I like Cashew!
> >
> :)
>
> I've started working on this. It'll take me a little while to get
> familiar with everything. I already know that my SPEC file works on
> Fedora 10 i386 and x86_64. But, I want to look up a couple of things.
Don't hesitate to ask me if you need some help!
Jaroslav
Thanks Jaroslav
But I've just submitted
kde-plasma-ihatethecashew
and
kde-plasma-tranlatoid
for review.
They both seem to work OK.
If they should pass, I will request a sponsor.
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
6:45 a.m.
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 14:35:33 Rex Dieter wrote:
Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> But I've just submitted
> kde-plasma-ihatethecashew
> and
> kde-plasma-tranlatoid
> for review.
bugzilla #'s?
Oops. :)
kde-plasma-ihatethecashew
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728
kde-plasma-translatoid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
6:58 a.m.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 02:45:05PM +0200, Eli Wapniarski wrote:
kde-plasma-ihatethecashew
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728
kde-plasma-translatoid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730
You need to make those bugs block "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored
That way it is clear that you need to be sponsored.
--
sven === jabber/xmpp: sven(a)lankes.net
8:22 a.m.
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 14:58:08 Sven Lankes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 02:45:05PM +0200, Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> kde-plasma-ihatethecashew
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728
> kde-plasma-translatoid
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730
You need to make those bugs block "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored
That way it is clear that you need to be sponsored.
The guidelines seem to indicate first things need to get passed and after they
pass I can ask for sponsorship.
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
8:32 a.m.
Eli Wapniarski wrote:
The guidelines seem to indicate first things need to get passed and
after they
pass I can ask for sponsorship.
Though, the usual procedure is that your first reviewer is usually your
sponsor. Doing these in parallel is ok too.
I'd be happy for Jaroslav (or other) do a first review here, and once
most review issues are sorted out, I (or another sponsor) give things a
final review before approving the pkg(s) and sponsoring you.
Have you created a FAS account yet? If not, please do so... we could
even forgo the wait on reviews.
-- Rex
8:49 a.m.
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 15:32:03 Rex Dieter wrote:
Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> The guidelines seem to indicate first things need to get passed and after
> they pass I can ask for sponsorship.
Though, the usual procedure is that your first reviewer is usually your
sponsor. Doing these in parallel is ok too.
I'd be happy for Jaroslav (or other) do a first review here, and once
most review issues are sorted out, I (or another sponsor) give things a
final review before approving the pkg(s) and sponsoring you.
Ok, I'm reviewing it right now, it's better to do it asap because later we can
forgot about this packages. Still waiting for Lukas'es kio_sysinfo review ;-)
I'll ping you when we sort out issues and we have package in good shape. The
first one - I hate Cashew is really easy to review but the second one brings
again flags issue :(
Jaroslav
Have you created a FAS account yet? If not, please do so... we
could
even forgo the wait on reviews.
-- Rex
_______________________________________________
fedora-kde mailing list
fedora-kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde
11:22 a.m.
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 16:49:48 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 15:32:03 Rex Dieter wrote:
> Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > The guidelines seem to indicate first things need to get passed and
> > after they pass I can ask for sponsorship.
>
> Though, the usual procedure is that your first reviewer is usually your
> sponsor. Doing these in parallel is ok too.
>
> I'd be happy for Jaroslav (or other) do a first review here, and once
> most review issues are sorted out, I (or another sponsor) give things a
> final review before approving the pkg(s) and sponsoring you.
Ok, I'm reviewing it right now, it's better to do it asap because later we
can forgot about this packages. Still waiting for Lukas'es kio_sysinfo
review ;-) I'll ping you when we sort out issues and we have package in
good shape. The first one - I hate Cashew is really easy to review but the
second one brings again flags issue :(
Jaroslav
> Have you created a FAS account yet? If not, please do so... we could
> even forgo the wait on reviews.
>
I've got a Fedora account. The instructions on how to ask to be sponsored are
not at all clear. It provides no navigation at all other than where there are
a list of sponsores.
Jaroslav.
I type rpmlint -i ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/kde-plasma
ihatethecashew-0.2b-3.fc10.src.rpm and get
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
I type rpmlint -c ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.spec and get...
huh?
usage: rpmlint.py [<options>] <rpm files|specfile>
options in:
[-i|--info]
[-I <error,error,>]
[-c|--check <check>]
[-a|--all]
[-C|--checkdir <checkdir>]
[-h|--help]
[-v|--verbose]
[-E|--extractdir <dir>]
[-p|--profile]
[-V|--version]
[-n|--noexception]
[-f|--file <config file to use instead of ~/.rpmlintrc>]
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
1:37 p.m.
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 19:22:38 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 16:49:48 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 February 2009 15:32:03 Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > > The guidelines seem to indicate first things need to get passed and
> > > after they pass I can ask for sponsorship.
> >
> > Though, the usual procedure is that your first reviewer is usually your
> > sponsor. Doing these in parallel is ok too.
> >
> > I'd be happy for Jaroslav (or other) do a first review here, and once
> > most review issues are sorted out, I (or another sponsor) give things a
> > final review before approving the pkg(s) and sponsoring you.
>
> Ok, I'm reviewing it right now, it's better to do it asap because later
> we can forgot about this packages. Still waiting for Lukas'es kio_sysinfo
> review ;-) I'll ping you when we sort out issues and we have package in
> good shape. The first one - I hate Cashew is really easy to review but
> the second one brings again flags issue :(
>
> Jaroslav
>
> > Have you created a FAS account yet? If not, please do so... we could
> > even forgo the wait on reviews.
I've got a Fedora account. The instructions on how to ask to be sponsored
are not at all clear. It provides no navigation at all other than where
there are a list of sponsores.
Just wondering if I got this right... I added "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" to the blocks
field. Is that right?
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
2:40 a.m.
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 20:37:25 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 19:22:38 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 February 2009 16:49:48 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 15:32:03 Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > > > The guidelines seem to indicate first things need to get passed and
> > > > after they pass I can ask for sponsorship.
> > >
> > > Though, the usual procedure is that your first reviewer is usually
> > > your sponsor. Doing these in parallel is ok too.
> > >
> > > I'd be happy for Jaroslav (or other) do a first review here, and once
> > > most review issues are sorted out, I (or another sponsor) give things
> > > a final review before approving the pkg(s) and sponsoring you.
> >
> > Ok, I'm reviewing it right now, it's better to do it asap because
later
> > we can forgot about this packages. Still waiting for Lukas'es
> > kio_sysinfo review ;-) I'll ping you when we sort out issues and we
> > have package in good shape. The first one - I hate Cashew is really
> > easy to review but the second one brings again flags issue :(
> >
> > Jaroslav
> >
> > > Have you created a FAS account yet? If not, please do so... we could
> > > even forgo the wait on reviews.
>
> I've got a Fedora account. The instructions on how to ask to be sponsored
> are not at all clear. It provides no navigation at all other than where
> there are a list of sponsores.
Just wondering if I got this right... I added "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" to the
blocks field. Is that right?
Don't hurry :-)
Review is on beginning! There are several other rules to be checked and then
we have to wait for Rex or Kevin, I can't sponsor you. In this case you don't
need to set FE-NEEDSPONSOR because we can sponsor you.
Ok, I'm going to finish review, you're lucky - some packages can wait years
for it :D
Jaroslav
Eli
2:47 a.m.
On Wednesday 04 February 2009 10:40:20 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 20:37:25 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 February 2009 19:22:38 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 16:49:48 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 15:32:03 Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > > Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > > > > The guidelines seem to indicate first things need to get passed
> > > > > and after they pass I can ask for sponsorship.
> > > >
> > > > Though, the usual procedure is that your first reviewer is usually
> > > > your sponsor. Doing these in parallel is ok too.
> > > >
> > > > I'd be happy for Jaroslav (or other) do a first review here, and
> > > > once most review issues are sorted out, I (or another sponsor) give
> > > > things a final review before approving the pkg(s) and sponsoring
> > > > you.
> > >
> > > Ok, I'm reviewing it right now, it's better to do it asap because
> > > later we can forgot about this packages. Still waiting for Lukas'es
> > > kio_sysinfo review ;-) I'll ping you when we sort out issues and we
> > > have package in good shape. The first one - I hate Cashew is really
> > > easy to review but the second one brings again flags issue :(
> > >
> > > Jaroslav
> > >
> > > > Have you created a FAS account yet? If not, please do so... we
> > > > could even forgo the wait on reviews.
> >
> > I've got a Fedora account. The instructions on how to ask to be
> > sponsored are not at all clear. It provides no navigation at all other
> > than where there are a list of sponsores.
>
> Just wondering if I got this right... I added "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" to the
> blocks field. Is that right?
Don't hurry :-)
Review is on beginning! There are several other rules to be checked and
then we have to wait for Rex or Kevin, I can't sponsor you. In this case
you don't need to set FE-NEEDSPONSOR because we can sponsor you.
Ok, I'm going to finish review, you're lucky - some packages can wait years
for it :D
Thanks Jaroslav
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
3:18 a.m.
On Wednesday 04 February 2009 09:47:33 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
>
> Ok, I'm going to finish review, you're lucky - some packages can wait
> years for it :D
Thanks Jaroslav
I think I hate Cashew is now ready, waiting for final check by Rex - then he
will sponsor you and you can ask for CVS and once CVS is ready you can import
it and finally build in Koji. Long trip ;-)
Jaroslav
Eli
3:49 a.m.
On Wednesday 04 February 2009 11:18:16 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Wednesday 04 February 2009 09:47:33 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > Ok, I'm going to finish review, you're lucky - some packages can wait
> > years for it :D
>
> Thanks Jaroslav
I think I hate Cashew is now ready, waiting for final check by Rex - then
he will sponsor you and you can ask for CVS and once CVS is ready you can
import it and finally build in Koji. Long trip ;-)
Jaroslav
Thanks for that
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
3:35 p.m.
2009/2/3 Eli Wapniarski <eli(a)orbsky.homelinux.org>
I've got a Fedora account. The instructions on how to ask to be
sponsored
are
not at all clear. It provides no navigation at all other than where there
are
a list of sponsores.
In this particular case you dont need to ask to be sponsored. If you have
stated in your review that you need a sponsor and have blocked
FE-NEEDSPONSOR then potential sponsors can find you easily. In this case Rex
has already effectively said he will sponsor you unless somebody else gets
there first although if others want to do an initial review first they
should feel free to.
Jaroslav.
I type rpmlint -i ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/kde-plasma
ihatethecashew-0.2b-3.fc10.src.rpm and get
No need to specify any aditional arguments eg:
rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/kde-plasmaihatethecashew-0.2b-3.fc10.src.rpm
If you leave out the arguments then all checks are performed by default.
rpmlint should be run on the spec file, the source rpm and the built rpms.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
I type rpmlint -c ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.spec and
get...
huh?
[...]
Same as above. Leave out the additional arguments. Should be:
rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.spec
The only time specifying specific tests to be run is is there is a vast
number of warnings/errors or a huge package that would take forever to do
all checks on.
Just wondering if I got this right... I added "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" to the blocks
field. Is that right?
Correct.
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and
those who don't...
8:34 a.m.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 04:22:06PM +0200, Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> You need to make those bugs block "FE-NEEDSPONSOR"
according to
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored
> That way it is clear that you need to be sponsored.
The guidelines seem to indicate first things need to get passed and
after they
pass I can ask for sponsorship.
Wrong.
You submit one or more review requests blocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR. After
that either you find a potential sponsor or a sponsor finds you, reviews
one of your packages, looks at other stuff you've done and then approves
your sponsorship request in fas. It is also possible that your sponsor
asks your to do some (demo)-package-reviews yourself to show that you've
understood the principles of fedora packaging.
--
sven === jabber/xmpp: sven(a)lankes.net
7:24 a.m.
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 13:45:05 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 14:35:33 Rex Dieter wrote:
> Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > But I've just submitted
> > kde-plasma-ihatethecashew
> > and
> > kde-plasma-tranlatoid
> > for review.
>
> bugzilla #'s?
Oops. :)
kde-plasma-ihatethecashew
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728
kde-plasma-translatoid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730
Ops and we have flags again on topic - this package ships kbflags...
Jaroslav
Eli
6:51 a.m.
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 13:35:33 Rex Dieter wrote:
Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> But I've just submitted
> kde-plasma-ihatethecashew
> and
> kde-plasma-tranlatoid
> for review.
bugzilla #'s?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728
and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730
I can help with review but I can't sponsor him, it's work for you Rex :)
-- Rex
_______________________________________________
fedora-kde mailing list
fedora-kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde
6:56 a.m.
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 12:35:33 Rex Dieter wrote:
Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> But I've just submitted
> kde-plasma-ihatethecashew
> and
> kde-plasma-tranlatoid
> for review.
bugzilla #'s?
Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730
Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE
Workspace
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728
-- Rex
--
José Abílio
5553
days inactive
5557
days old
34 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
Arthur Pemberton -
Eli Wapniarski -
Florian Sievert -
Jaroslav Reznik -
John5342 -
José Abílio Matos -
Kevin Kofler -
Rex Dieter -
Sven Lankes