Hi,
I'm using Wuala [1] secure online storage. One of its options is filesystem integration. "With filesystem integration enabled, Wuala creates a virtual harddisk drive to which your operating system can connect."
On Linux FUSE is used. The output of df -h gives: javafs 1.0G 50M 975M 5% /home/martin/WualaDrive
What I experience is that scrolling and opening/entering directories in Dolphin and Konqueror is rather slow.
I saw that there is a report in bugs.kde.org [2] where Dolphin gets slow when using sshfs (FUSE).
I've issued "ls -al WualaDrive" on the command line (Konsole) which is fast. The same for Nautilus in Gnome.
Did anyone else have seen this? Do I miss something?
Thanks,
Martin Kho
I'm running a full updated Fedora 15. Dolphin Version 1.6.1, Using KDE Development Platform 4.6.3
[1] http://www.wuala.com/en [2] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178678
Sounds like you should file a bug report at bugs.kde.org. No idea what's causing your problem, though.
Am Sonntag 26 Juni 2011, 23:58:27 schrieb Martin Kho:
Hi,
I'm using Wuala [1] secure online storage. One of its options is filesystem integration. "With filesystem integration enabled, Wuala creates a virtual harddisk drive to which your operating system can connect."
On Linux FUSE is used. The output of df -h gives: javafs 1.0G 50M 975M 5% /home/martin/WualaDrive
What I experience is that scrolling and opening/entering directories in Dolphin and Konqueror is rather slow.
I saw that there is a report in bugs.kde.org [2] where Dolphin gets slow when using sshfs (FUSE).
I've issued "ls -al WualaDrive" on the command line (Konsole) which is fast. The same for Nautilus in Gnome.
Did anyone else have seen this? Do I miss something?
Thanks,
Martin Kho
I'm running a full updated Fedora 15. Dolphin Version 1.6.1, Using KDE Development Platform 4.6.3
[1] http://www.wuala.com/en [2] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178678 _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
On Friday 01 July 2011 12:47:04 Markus Slopianka wrote:
Sounds like you should file a bug report at bugs.kde.org. No idea what's causing your problem, though.
Hi Markus,
see: #276924
Martin Kho
Am Sonntag 26 Juni 2011, 23:58:27 schrieb Martin Kho:
Hi,
I'm using Wuala [1] secure online storage. One of its options is filesystem integration. "With filesystem integration enabled, Wuala creates a virtual harddisk drive to which your operating system can connect."
On Linux FUSE is used. The output of df -h gives: javafs 1.0G 50M 975M 5% /home/martin/WualaDrive
What I experience is that scrolling and opening/entering directories in Dolphin and Konqueror is rather slow.
I saw that there is a report in bugs.kde.org [2] where Dolphin gets slow when using sshfs (FUSE).
I've issued "ls -al WualaDrive" on the command line (Konsole) which is fast. The same for Nautilus in Gnome.
Did anyone else have seen this? Do I miss something?
Thanks,
Martin Kho
I'm running a full updated Fedora 15. Dolphin Version 1.6.1, Using KDE Development Platform 4.6.3
[1] http://www.wuala.com/en [2] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178678 _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
kde mailing list kde@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
Am 01.07.2011 23:40, schrieb Martin Kho:
On Friday 01 July 2011 12:47:04 Markus Slopianka wrote:
Sounds like you should file a bug report at bugs.kde.org. No idea what's causing your problem, though.
Hi Markus,
see: #276924
the problem is that konqueror/kde are generally slow with remote filesystems because the counting of items, try generating previews and so on takes way too much time over network but it does upstream nobody interest that this is painfully and there should be a differnt handling for remote-filsystems
yes, this would be a hack because it would make a difference between remote/local, but this is needed as long not all machines have 100 Mbit up