On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:13 am, Adam Williamson > <adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote: > > So, once again: do we think it makes sense to consider desktop user > > switching - that is, switching between multiple active desktop > > sessions > > for different users, without logging out and in - as release-blocking? > > Workstation WG agrees that user switching should be release blocking. > We trust QA will write the specific release criterion. Obvious thing to do would be to resurrect kparal's old draft. So, KDE team, since we'll be blocking on this for GNOME, do you want us to include KDE too or make it Workstation-only? Thanks!

On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 12:04 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:01 PM Adam Williamson > <adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:13 am, Adam Williamson > > > <adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote: > > > > So, once again: do we think it makes sense to consider desktop user > > > > switching - that is, switching between multiple active desktop > > > > sessions > > > > for different users, without logging out and in - as release-blocking? > > > > > > Workstation WG agrees that user switching should be release blocking. > > > We trust QA will write the specific release criterion. > > > > Obvious thing to do would be to resurrect kparal's old draft. So, KDE > > team, since we'll be blocking on this for GNOME, do you want us to > > include KDE too or make it Workstation-only? Thanks! > > I believe Rex mentioned earlier in the thread[1] that it should > include KDE. As a member of both Workstation WG and KDE SIG, *record scratch* wait, is that even legal?!