Subject: Re: de-modularising for the win!
Message-ID: <20080920105355.GA6663(a)nostromo.devel.redhat.com>
References: <20080918191355.GA9683(a)nostromo.devel.redhat.com>
<48D2D94E.2020902(a)redhat.com>
<20080918231301.GA4734(a)nostromo.devel.redhat.com>
<1221790735.15361.152.camel(a)aglarond.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1221790735.15361.152.camel(a)aglarond.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Jeremy Katz (katzj(a)redhat.com) said:
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 16:13 -0700, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> - killing the initrd for that general 90% case can be a big win
Ermm, the general 90% (or some large-ish generalizing percentage) are
set up to use LVM. Which then requires an initrd.
Yes, but ... LVM is overkill, in general. (That's another discussion.)
On further consideration, though, the biggest issue with kicking out
the initrd is getting the policy lodaed.
Bill