5:49 p.m.
I noticed that config-x86 and config-x86_64 both have tpm_infineon=m but
config-ia64 does not. I enabled that on my system and rebuild the
kernel rpm and everything just worked. Could tpm_infineon be built as a
module by default for ia64?
Thanks
-matt
5:59 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 06:49:51PM -0500, Matt Anderson wrote:
I noticed that config-x86 and config-x86_64 both have tpm_infineon=m
but
config-ia64 does not. I enabled that on my system and rebuild the kernel
rpm and everything just worked. Could tpm_infineon be built as a module by
default for ia64?
er, sure, i guess.
cheers, Kyle
7:27 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 06:59:05PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 06:49:51PM -0500, Matt Anderson wrote:
> I noticed that config-x86 and config-x86_64 both have tpm_infineon=m but
> config-ia64 does not. I enabled that on my system and rebuild the kernel
> rpm and everything just worked. Could tpm_infineon be built as a module by
> default for ia64?
>
er, sure, i guess.
No objection either, though it's worth noting that there's no userspace
support in Fedora for any of the TPM kernel stuff.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
7:43 p.m.
Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 06:59:05PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 06:49:51PM -0500, Matt Anderson wrote:
> > I noticed that config-x86 and config-x86_64 both have tpm_infineon=m but
> > config-ia64 does not. I enabled that on my system and rebuild the kernel
> > rpm and everything just worked. Could tpm_infineon be built as a module by
> > default for ia64?
> >
>
> er, sure, i guess.
No objection either, though it's worth noting that there's no userspace
support in Fedora for any of the TPM kernel stuff.
However, I believe trousers has been submitted for fedora review, and
was close to being accepted if it hasn't been already.
--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson(a)redhat.com
3:42 p.m.
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Dave Jones (davej(a)redhat.com) said:
> No objection either, though it's worth noting that there's no userspace
> support in Fedora for any of the TPM kernel stuff.
It's there in rawhide (tpm_tools, trousers)
So is this something that can just be enabled, or would you like me to
open a bugzilla for this?
-matt
3:53 p.m.
Matt Anderson wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dave Jones (davej(a)redhat.com) said:
>> No objection either, though it's worth noting that there's no userspace
>> support in Fedora for any of the TPM kernel stuff.
>
> It's there in rawhide (tpm_tools, trousers)
So is this something that can just be enabled, or would you like me to
open a bugzilla for this?
Kyle already did it.
--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson(a)redhat.com
3:54 p.m.
Jarod Wilson wrote:
Matt Anderson wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Dave Jones (davej(a)redhat.com) said:
>>> No objection either, though it's worth noting that there's no
userspace
>>> support in Fedora for any of the TPM kernel stuff.
>> It's there in rawhide (tpm_tools, trousers)
> So is this something that can just be enabled, or would you like me to
> open a bugzilla for this?
Kyle already did it.
You guys are awesome.
5936
days inactive
5937
days old
kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
7 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Bill Nottingham -
Dave Jones -
Jarod Wilson -
Kyle McMartin -
Matt Anderson