Even though I have nobuild set for architectures, rpmbuild is processing their configs. Is this correct?
12:10 p.m.
I build a custom local kernel using the rawhide kernel src.rpm here on
F31. I change the spec file to build only for my arch, x86_64, and not
to build cross headers. But I notice that the config files for all the
nobuild archs are still processed. This seems like an error to me. Is
it?
In the kernel.spec file.
%define nobuildarches i386 i686 ppc64 s390x %{arm} %{power64} aarch64 ppc64le
Output from rpmbuild -bb kernel.spec.
Processing
/home/stan/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-5.3.fc31/linux-5.4.0-0.rc8.git1.2.20191124.fc31.x86_64/configs/kernel-5.4.0-aarch64.config
... done
Processing
/home/stan/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-5.3.fc31/linux-5.4.0-0.rc8.git1.2.20191124.fc31.x86_64/configs/kernel-5.4.0-armv7hl-lpae.config
... done
Processing
/home/stan/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-5.3.fc31/linux-5.4.0-0.rc8.git1.2.20191124.fc31.x86_64/configs/kernel-5.4.0-armv7hl.config
... done
Processing
/home/stan/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-5.3.fc31/linux-5.4.0-0.rc8.git1.2.20191124.fc31.x86_64/configs/kernel-5.4.0-i686.config
... done
Processing
/home/stan/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-5.3.fc31/linux-5.4.0-0.rc8.git1.2.20191124.fc31.x86_64/configs/kernel-5.4.0-ppc64le.config
... done
Processing
/home/stan/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-5.3.fc31/linux-5.4.0-0.rc8.git1.2.20191124.fc31.x86_64/configs/kernel-5.4.0-s390x.config
... done
7:08 a.m.
New subject: Even though I have nobuild set for architectures, rpmbuild is
processing their configs. Is this correct?
On 11/24/19 1:10 PM, stan wrote:
I build a custom local kernel using the rawhide kernel src.rpm here
on
F31. I change the spec file to build only for my arch, x86_64, and not
to build cross headers. But I notice that the config files for all the
nobuild archs are still processed. This seems like an error to me. Is
it?
What you are suggesting is an optimization. There's no technical issue
with running the checks on nobuild arches. If you have a patch to
not run the checks we can see about incorporating it.
In the kernel.spec file.
%define nobuildarches i386 i686 ppc64 s390x %{arm} %{power64} aarch64 ppc64le
Output from rpmbuild -bb kernel.spec.
Processing
/home/stan/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-5.3.fc31/linux-5.4.0-0.rc8.git1.2.20191124.fc31.x86_64/configs/kernel-5.4.0-aarch64.config
... done
Processing
/home/stan/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-5.3.fc31/linux-5.4.0-0.rc8.git1.2.20191124.fc31.x86_64/configs/kernel-5.4.0-armv7hl-lpae.config
... done
Processing
/home/stan/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-5.3.fc31/linux-5.4.0-0.rc8.git1.2.20191124.fc31.x86_64/configs/kernel-5.4.0-armv7hl.config
... done
Processing
/home/stan/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-5.3.fc31/linux-5.4.0-0.rc8.git1.2.20191124.fc31.x86_64/configs/kernel-5.4.0-i686.config
... done
Processing
/home/stan/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-5.3.fc31/linux-5.4.0-0.rc8.git1.2.20191124.fc31.x86_64/configs/kernel-5.4.0-ppc64le.config
... done
Processing
/home/stan/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-5.3.fc31/linux-5.4.0-0.rc8.git1.2.20191124.fc31.x86_64/configs/kernel-5.4.0-s390x.config
... done
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
10:08 a.m.
New subject: Even though I have nobuild set for architectures, rpmbuild is
processing their configs. Is this correct?
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:08:44 -0500
Laura Abbott <labbott(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 11/24/19 1:10 PM, stan wrote:
> I build a custom local kernel using the rawhide kernel src.rpm here
> on F31. I change the spec file to build only for my arch, x86_64,
> and not to build cross headers. But I notice that the config files
> for all the nobuild archs are still processed. This seems like an
> error to me. Is it?
>
What you are suggesting is an optimization. There's no technical issue
with running the checks on nobuild arches. If you have a patch to
not run the checks we can see about incorporating it.
Yeah, it's been happening forever, but I thought that while I was
asking I might as well ask about it. If it was trivial to fix, it
would save a little time.
Given my (lack of) understanding of spec files, I wouldn't trust any
patch I could come up with, but I'll take a quick look next time I
build a kernel. :-)
Thanks.
1607
days inactive
1608
days old
kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Laura Abbott -
stan