kmod-maint July 2016

kmod-maint@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
13 discussions

[Bug 1320921] New: modinfo doesn't show modules signatures
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Nov '18

27 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320921 Bug ID: 1320921 Summary: modinfo doesn't show modules signatures Product: Fedora Version: 24 Component: kmod Severity: urgent Assignee: kmod-maint(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: t.artem(a)mailcity.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jonathan(a)jonmasters.org, kmod-maint(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Description of problem: in theory modinfo should show modules signatures Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kmod-22-2.fc23.x86_64 # modinfo snd filename: /lib/modules/4.4.6-300.fc23.x86_64/kernel/sound/core/snd.ko.xz alias: char-major-116-* license: GPL description: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture driver for soundcards. author: Jaroslav Kysela <perex(a)perex.cz> depends: soundcore intree: Y vermagic: 4.4.6-300.fc23.x86_64 SMP mod_unload parm: debug:Debug level (0 = disable) (int) parm: slots:Module names assigned to the slots. (array of charp) parm: major:Major # for sound driver. (int) parm: cards_limit:Count of auto-loadable soundcards. (int) The problem is also discussed here: https://github.com/coreos/bugs/issues/1054 The only workaround at the moment is to run this command: # xzcat `modinfo -n snd` | grep 'Module signature appended' Binary file (standard input) matches -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

2 19

[Bug 1208554] New: Remove the explicit requires on kmod-libs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 May '18

29 May '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208554 Bug ID: 1208554 Summary: Remove the explicit requires on kmod-libs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: kmod Assignee: kmod-maint(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: dshea(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jonathan(a)jonmasters.org, kmod-maint(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, msivak(a)redhat.com The kmod package doesn't need to require kmod-libs anymore, since /bin/kmod has been statically linked with libkmod since kmod-15 or so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

2 8

[Bug 1314154] New: [abrt] kmod: depmod_report_cycles(): kmod killed by SIGABRT
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Nov '16

08 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314154 Bug ID: 1314154 Summary: [abrt] kmod: depmod_report_cycles(): kmod killed by SIGABRT Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: kmod Assignee: kmod-maint(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: ariscop(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jonathan(a)jonmasters.org, kmod-maint(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Running make module_install on a kernel https://github.com/01org/Igvtg-kernel/tree/gvt-upstream-rfc With this patch: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/332609/45698068 to make it actually build --------- DEPMOD 4.5.0-rc1-gvt+ depmod: ERROR: Found 6 modules in dependency cycles! depmod: ERROR: Cycle detected: drm depmod: ERROR: Cycle detected: i915_gvt -> i915 -> video depmod: ERROR: Cycle detected: i915_gvt -> i915 -> drm_kms_helper *** Error in `/sbin/depmod': free(): invalid next size (fast): 0x000055707d2a5f90 *** Version-Release number of selected component: kmod-22-3.fc24 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.6.4 backtrace_rating: 3 cmdline: /sbin/depmod -ae -F System.map 4.5.0-rc1-gvt+ crash_function: depmod_report_cycles executable: /usr/bin/kmod global_pid: 29942 kernel: 4.5.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc24.x86_64 runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 0 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (5 frames) #6 depmod_report_cycles at tools/depmod.c:1519 #7 depmod_calculate_dependencies at tools/depmod.c:1596 #8 depmod_load at tools/depmod.c:1623 #9 do_depmod at tools/depmod.c:2592 #11 _start -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1210375] [RFE] separate assembler out of binutils into a subpackage
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jul '16

22 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210375 Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed|2016-07-19 16:30:19 |2016-07-22 10:28:53 --- Comment #21 from Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com> --- OK... So I'm going to close this as WONTFIX because none of the requirements in terms of customer needs reflect on Fedora, and Fedora doesn't actually use the weak-modules mechanism anyway. When you guys figure out what you want to do in RHEL, I'll happily take that into Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1210375] [RFE] separate assembler out of binutils into a subpackage
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jul '16

22 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210375 --- Comment #20 from David Shea <dshea(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Josh Boyer from comment #19) > (In reply to David Shea from comment #18) > > (In reply to Josh Boyer from comment #17) > > > David, did you solve this in RHEL? Fedora doesn't use weak-modules and we > > > could drop it entirely there, but we keep it in place for symmetry with RHEL. > > > > There was never a RHEL bug opened for this, so no. > > Erm... this is a clone of a RHEL bug. against binutils. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1210375] [RFE] separate assembler out of binutils into a subpackage
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jul '16

22 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210375 --- Comment #19 from Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to David Shea from comment #18) > (In reply to Josh Boyer from comment #17) > > David, did you solve this in RHEL? Fedora doesn't use weak-modules and we > > could drop it entirely there, but we keep it in place for symmetry with RHEL. > > There was never a RHEL bug opened for this, so no. Erm... this is a clone of a RHEL bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1210375] [RFE] separate assembler out of binutils into a subpackage
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jul '16

22 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210375 --- Comment #18 from David Shea <dshea(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Josh Boyer from comment #17) > David, did you solve this in RHEL? Fedora doesn't use weak-modules and we > could drop it entirely there, but we keep it in place for symmetry with RHEL. There was never a RHEL bug opened for this, so no. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1210375] [RFE] separate assembler out of binutils into a subpackage
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jul '16

22 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210375 --- Comment #17 from Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com> --- David, did you solve this in RHEL? Fedora doesn't use weak-modules and we could drop it entirely there, but we keep it in place for symmetry with RHEL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1358277] New: kmod-23 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jul '16

22 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358277 Bug ID: 1358277 Summary: kmod-23 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: kmod Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: kmod-maint(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jonathan(a)jonmasters.org, kmod-maint(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 23 Current version/release in rawhide: 22-4.fc25 URL: http://kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/kmod/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1517/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1210375] [RFE] separate assembler out of binutils into a subpackage
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '16

19 Jul '16

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

kmod-maint July 2016