kmod-maint January 2019

kmod-maint@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
5 discussions

[Bug 1320921] modinfo shows incomplete module signature information
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 29 Jan '19

29 Jan '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320921 --- Comment #20 from Mark J. Cox <mjc(a)redhat.com> --- Proposed upstream patch is based on OpenSSL now at https://lore.kernel.org/linux-modules/xunybm3z94j6.fsf@redhat.com/T/#t -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1320921] modinfo shows incomplete module signature information
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 23 Jan '19

23 Jan '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320921 Stanislav Kozina <skozina(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skozina(a)redhat.com --- Comment #19 from Stanislav Kozina <skozina(a)redhat.com> --- This bug has been stalled on upstream review. Recently there's certain progress: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-modules/CAKi4VALJcbwq2SKpb3fBw022gBO1kBe0qL9=… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1320921] modinfo shows incomplete module signature information
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Jan '19

22 Jan '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320921 Laurie Barry <laurie.barry(a)broadcom.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1668459 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668459 [Bug 1668459] modinfo shows incomplete module signature information -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1320921] modinfo shows incomplete module signature information
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Jan '19

22 Jan '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320921 Laurie Barry <laurie.barry(a)broadcom.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |laurie.barry(a)broadcom.com Flags| |needinfo?(kmod-maint@lists. | |fedoraproject.org) --- Comment #18 from Laurie Barry <laurie.barry(a)broadcom.com> --- This bug has benign, but ugly side affects. This bug causes modinfo to report incorrect information. I used modinfo on SLES 15 SP1 and RHEL 8SS3 to display the differences. Testing on RHEL8 SS3: [root@RHEL8SS3]# modinfo /lib/modules/4.18.0-56.el8.x86_64/kernel/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.ko.xz | grep sig sig_id: PKCS#7 signer: sig_key: sig_hashalgo: md4 signature: 30:82:02:64:06:09:2A:86:48:86:F7:0D:01:07:02:A0:82:02:55:30: [root@RHEL8SS3]# Copied the RHEL 8 lpfc.ko to SLES 15 SP1: linux-20l6:~ # modinfo ./lpfc.ko.xz | grep sig sig_id: PKCS#7 signer: Red Hat Enterprise Linux kernel signing key sig_key: 30:6C:31:10:30:0E:06:03:55:04:0A:0C:07:52:65:64:20:48:61:74: sig_hashalgo: sha256 signature: 91:34:9F:FB:78:60:3B:15:47:A6:0A:93:39:17:37:D9:F6:39:97:AE: linux-20l6:~ # Not only are many of the fields empty or incorrect, but loading an ECD signed driver on RHEL8 causes the kernel to report a warning: # dmesg | grep PKCS [61234.894961] PKCS#7 signature not signed with a trusted key It's in Red Hat's best interest to fix this in RHEL 8.0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

needinfo requested: [Bug 1320921] modinfo shows incomplete module signature information
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 22 Jan '19

22 Jan '19

Product: Fedora Version: 29 Component: kmod Laurie Barry <laurie.barry(a)broadcom.com> has asked kmod development team <kmod-maint(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> for needinfo: Bug 1320921: modinfo shows incomplete module signature information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320921 --- Comment #18 from Laurie Barry <laurie.barry(a)broadcom.com> --- This bug has benign, but ugly side affects. This bug causes modinfo to report incorrect information. I used modinfo on SLES 15 SP1 and RHEL 8SS3 to display the differences. Testing on RHEL8 SS3: [root@RHEL8SS3]# modinfo /lib/modules/4.18.0-56.el8.x86_64/kernel/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc.ko.xz | grep sig sig_id: PKCS#7 signer: sig_key: sig_hashalgo: md4 signature: 30:82:02:64:06:09:2A:86:48:86:F7:0D:01:07:02:A0:82:02:55:30: [root@RHEL8SS3]# Copied the RHEL 8 lpfc.ko to SLES 15 SP1: linux-20l6:~ # modinfo ./lpfc.ko.xz | grep sig sig_id: PKCS#7 signer: Red Hat Enterprise Linux kernel signing key sig_key: 30:6C:31:10:30:0E:06:03:55:04:0A:0C:07:52:65:64:20:48:61:74: sig_hashalgo: sha256 signature: 91:34:9F:FB:78:60:3B:15:47:A6:0A:93:39:17:37:D9:F6:39:97:AE: linux-20l6:~ # Not only are many of the fields empty or incorrect, but loading an ECD signed driver on RHEL8 causes the kernel to report a warning: # dmesg | grep PKCS [61234.894961] PKCS#7 signature not signed with a trusted key It's in Red Hat's best interest to fix this in RHEL 8.0.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

kmod-maint January 2019