Hey,
I recently encountered a new license in a web app that a friend of
mine showed me:
https://github.com/JacobCZ/flask-directory-list/blob/master/LICENSE
This license seems to be a copyleft-ish version of the WTFPL, but I'm not sure.
Is this a license that qualifies on Fedora's good license list?
Thanks in advance!
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
Hello,
Q:
Is it needed to explicitly list (or pack) license (files) of a library
that a package bundles? [1]
And if yes, what's the right way to do so?
The built package only contain 1 binary (and it's manpage and license
file). In this case - when no sources are packed - I'd understand that
it is sufficient to list and pack only the single license of the
resulting project.
Is that correct?
--
The package is 'pgloader' and it is now on a review to enter Fedora. [2]
--
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging...
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748233
--
Michal Schorm
Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
--
