On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:32:38 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <sundaram(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On 08/16/2009 08:15 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On
> The MS Public License is acceptable for Fedora, Free but GPL
> incompatible. I'm adding it to the table now.
Can you let me know why it is GPL incompatible?
It says:
If you distribute any portion of the software in source code form, you
may do so only under this license by including a complete copy of this
license with your distribution. If you distribute any portion of the
software in compiled or object code form, you may only do so under a
license that complies with this license.
We believe that the "only under this license" condition should be
interpreted as a weak copyleft requirement; such requirements are
customarily considered GPL-incompatible. We've discussed this with the
Free Software Foundation, which agrees with our interpretation.
My recollection is that when the MS-PL was submitted for OSI approval,
in the ensuing discussion on license-discuss, the Microsoft legal
representatives made clear that they had designed the license to be
GPL-incompatible. Possibly I'm misremembering. However, Microsoft could
settle the matter by clarifying whether the provision I quoted is a
weak copyleft requirement, or not.
- RF