* Richard Fontana:
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:19 AM Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com wrote:
The licensing wiki says that the IEEE license is a “good” documentation license. However, with the 2017 release, IEEE switched to this license:
| The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and The Open Group, | have given us permission to reprint portions of their documentation. | | In the following statement, the phrase ``this text'' refers to portions of | the system documentation. | | Portions of this text are reprinted and reproduced in electronic form in | the Linux man-pages project, from IEEE Std 1003.1-2017, Standard for | Information Technology -- Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX), The | Open Group Base Specifications Issue 7, 2018 Edition, Copyright (C) 2018 | by The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc and The Open | Group. In the event of any discrepancy between these versions and the | original IEEE and The Open Group Standard, the original IEEE and The Open | Group Standard is the referee document. The original Standard can be | obtained online at http://www.opengroup.org/unix/online.html . | | This notice shall appear on any product containing this material.
This license no longer permits modified redistribution, as far as I can see. Is this still an acceptable documentation license as far as Fedora is concerned?
I think this should not be considered an acceptable license for documentation, given the differences from the version reproduced in the Fedora wiki (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:IEEEDocLicense).
Copying Joshua Gay for awareness.
What should we do here?
In the CC0 context, it was mentioned that Fedora considers restrictions on modification acceptable for documentation licenses. Wouldn't this make the updated IEEE license acceptable as well? Or is a total ban on modified redistribution going too far?
Should we remove content that uses this updated IEEE license from Fedora?
Thanks, Florian