Hello

I have one question about one license previously marked as MIT.

On 3/25/15 13:47, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 03/13/2015 05:41 AM, Petr Šabata wrote:
> I found one more license in perl which I'm not sure about;
> according to the source comments, this comes from metamail:

> Copyright (c) 1991 Bell Communications Research, Inc. (Bellcore)

> Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this material for
> any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided that the
> above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all
> copies, and that the name of Bellcore not be used in advertising or
> publicity pertaining to this material without the specific, prior
> written permission of an authorized representative of Bellcore.
> BELLCORE MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE ACCURACY OR
> SUITABILITY OF THIS MATERIAL FOR ANY PURPOSE.  IT IS PROVIDED "AS
> IS", WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES.

This is yet another MIT variant. Just use MIT here.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT?rd=Licensing/MIT#Old_Style_(Bellcore_variant)

Shall I still use MIT or is it different license?

Full source:
https://github.com/Dual-Life/mime-base64/blob/master/Base64.xs

Thanks,
Jitka

~tom

==
Red Hat
> _______________________________________________ > legal mailing list > legal@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
--
Jitka Plesnikova
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat