Thanks to all the package maintainers who
have been diligently updating their packages to SPDX identifiers!
Here are a few interesting stats:
- 160 issues in the Fedora-license-data, which has resulted in 34
new license/TOML files being added to the data, and 18 more ready
to be added
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/?sort=created_date&state=opened&label_name%5B%5D=TOML%20file%3A%3Aneeded&first_page_size=100
- As of the SPDX License List v3.20 release this past week, 40 new
licenses have been added to the SPDX License List
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/releases/tag/v3.20
The vast majority of these have been as a result of Fedora's new
policy (and most of those have been submitted by Richard)
- We continue to improve the documentation for guidance on
updating existing packages
Related to process, a couple reminders:
Please review the process description for license review
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-review-process/
and make sure you see the process through to the end!
Issue titles in Gitlab: The License Review template does not add a
Title - if you have a current issue in the Fedora License Data
and could update the title to "License Review: <name of
license>" that would be immensely helpful. If you end up
submitting the license to SPDX, ensuring the name of the license
in the issue is consistent in both repos would also be really
helpful.
Engage with the SPDX-legal community: if your license
requires submission there, helping see that process through. (It
is not scalable for Richard to submit most of the licenses to SPDX
and me to create the files for those licenses... :)
We have been implementing labels in the Fedora License Data repo
to help indicate what is needed next. I think I've caught up on
noting in the corresponding the ones that have been dealt with on
the SPDX side, but please check your issues and tag me if I've
missed something.
Don't forget the last step: create a MR to add the TOML file to
the Fedora-license-data!
Let us know if you have any questions or suggestions for
improvements. We've had two "office hours" so far with no
attendees, but happy to schedule a few more for open discussion or
questions!
Thanks,
Jilayne